Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

10/22/2008
11:29 AM
George Crump
George Crump
Commentary
50%
50%

Clustered NAS In The Cloud

It seems that nowhere is the use of clustered NAS going to be more prevalent than in the cloud. They seem tailor made for each other because cloud-based services have the need for massive scaling and moderate performance while being very cost effective. Clustered NAS solutions seem to fill that bill.

It seems that nowhere is the use of clustered NAS going to be more prevalent than in the cloud. They seem tailor made for each other because cloud-based services have the need for massive scaling and moderate performance while being very cost effective. Clustered NAS solutions seem to fill that bill.Interestingly, a difference between local and cloud-based network-attached storage systems is the requirement on local NAS systems for CIFS and NFS protocol support. This isn't the case with cloud-based storage. While more and more cloud service providers are adding NFS and CIFS support, the protocols aren't considered ideal for the bandwidth-sensitive Internet. These protocols give way to HTTP, FTP, or webdev, for example.

There have been interesting solutions to resolve the gap between NFS/CIFS and the reality of the Internet. Nirvanix, for example, has rolled out a NFS/CIFS gateway that is installed at the local data center and acts as a protocol converter to its cloud storage service. Other than some support concerns about local hardware, this provides the user with a more familiar transfer protocol interface while providing transfer efficiency that a cloud storage service desires because of the thinner bandwidth and latency of the Internet.

The cloud storage providers have a key decision to make as it relates to clustered NAS, and the jury seems to be out on the best approach. Do you develop the technology in-house or use current technology? Amazon and Nirvanix are examples of companies that are leveraging their own IP and then offering a turnkey service. Other companies, such as Cleversafe or ParaScale, are providing the clustered NAS technology to infrastructure providers or even standalone organizations to create a private cloud. This allows these types of companies to focus on their core competencies and add value in other ways, not having to re-invent the storage wheel.

The distributed nature of the cloud services also plays into the hands of clustered NAS quite well, since most of these solutions have replication built into the OS. Replication isn't an add-on like in traditional storage; the capability is basically a part of the operating system itself. Clouds need this distribution of data for both protection of that data in the event of a site failure or in the distribution of that data for streaming applications. For example, if you had a movie posted to the Internet, it could be streamed from the closest, least-busy set of nodes.

In the next entry we will dive a little deeper into the performance and scale differences between tightly coupled clusters and loosely coupled clusters and how those differences might determine what type of solution you select for clustered storage, be it local or cloud.

Be sure to register for our upcoming webinar, Demystifying Primary Storage Data Reduction.

Track us on Twitter: http://twitter.com/storageswiss.

Subscribe to our RSS feed.

George Crump is founder of Storage Switzerland, an analyst firm focused on the virtualization and storage marketplaces. It provides strategic consulting and analysis to storage users, suppliers, and integrators. An industry veteran of more than 25 years, Crump has held engineering and sales positions at various IT industry manufacturers and integrators. Prior to Storage Switzerland, he was CTO at one of the nation's largest integrators.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Look Beyond the 'Big 5' in Cyberattacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/25/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I think the boss is bing watching '70s TV shows again!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5423
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
CAPI (Cloud Controller) versions prior to 1.101.0 are vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack in which an unauthenticated malicious attacker can send specially-crafted YAML files to certain endpoints, causing the YAML parser to consume excessive CPU and RAM.
CVE-2020-29454
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
Editors/LogViewerController.cs in Umbraco through 8.9.1 allows a user to visit a logviewer endpoint even if they lack Applications.Settings access.
CVE-2020-7199
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
A security vulnerability has been identified in the HPE Edgeline Infrastructure Manager, also known as HPE Edgeline Infrastructure Management Software. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to bypass remote authentication leading to execution of arbitrary commands, gaining privileged access,...
CVE-2020-14260
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
HCL Domino is susceptible to a Buffer Overflow vulnerability in DXL due to improper validation of user input. A successful exploit could enable an attacker to crash Domino or execute attacker-controlled code on the server system.
CVE-2020-14305
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-02
An out-of-bounds memory write flaw was found in how the Linux kernel’s Voice Over IP H.323 connection tracking functionality handled connections on ipv6 port 1720. This flaw allows an unauthenticated remote user to crash the system, causing a denial of service. The highest threat ...