Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

Cloud Storage Spurned By Fortune 1000

Concerns about costs, speed of data retrieval led 87% of enterprises surveyed by TheInfoPro to dismiss the technology for archive and backup.

Slideshow: Apotheker Takes The Stage, Paints An HP Cloud Vision
(click image for larger view)
Slideshow: Apotheker Takes The Stage, Paints An HP Cloud Vision
When it comes to cloud-based storage offerings, most enterprise-class companies are not interested, even for the lowest tier of data for archiving purposes, according to a survey of 247 Fortune 1000 corporations.

The survey, by 451 Group division TheInfoPro, found that 87% of those surveyed had no plans to use cloud storage as an archive or lower tier. Even small and midsize businesses weren't interested in cloud-based storage, with about the same 90% feeling apathy toward the technology, said Marco Coulter, TheInfoPro's research director of storage.

"It doesn't make sense for (the surveyed respondents) to separate their computers and storage, and have the computers internally and storage externally," Coulter said in an interview. "Even for archiving data they were concerned they couldn't retrieve their data in time."

The findings reflect the same lack of interest that has forced Iron Mountain, EMC, and Vaultscape to close their storage-as-a-service offerings over the past couple years.

"(Our) archive is tape. I don't think we'll be able to take advantage of the cloud," said an anonymous representative who participated in the survey. "The cost seems to keep going up. We priced Amazon, and the cost to send the data there and maintain it over time was less than putting up a new silo internally."

Another highlight of the study is the increasing popularity of auto-tiering, which was the fourth most popular storage initiative, behind technology refresh and expansion, consolidation, and "keeping the lights on." The surge in popularity is leading to a higher demand for solid-state drive (SSD) technology.

Storage expenditures are expected to grow in 2011 for 43% of respondents, which is nearly on par with last year's 44% who planned to increase spending on storage.

Private cloud adoption was much different than public cloud storage, with 40% saying there were no obstacles to implementation. Of the remaining respondents, the obstacles to implementing private cloud services include reliability concerns (20%), 10-GB IP core switch (10%), compliance qualification (10%), and end-user education (10%).

When it comes to the impact of sever virtualization on storage growth and complexity, 40% of respondents said it affected capacity growth, 27% said it increased troubleshooting complexity, about 17% said density caused bottlenecks, and about 5% said it reduced cost.

The survey also found that with virtualized servers, respondents prefer Fibre Channel storage area networks (SANs) compared with network-attached storage (NAS). "Some have predicted that NAS is going to be huge and is growing much faster than SAN; storage professionals are telling us a different story," Coulter said.

Networked storage capacity is projected to grow by 24% in 2011, with 44% expected to spend more on capacity, and 31% anticipating stable spending, according to the survey. InformationWeek's 2011 State Of Storage Survey found that managed data is increasing by 20% per year, and there is a long tail of besieged IT staffs dealing with growth rates exceeding 50%.

When asked which vendors have the most exciting storage products or services, respondents placed HP ahead of NetApp to claim the second spot. This was the first time HP moved ahead of NetApp regarding this question since the survey was first conducted in 2002, and was primarily due to HP's acquisition of 3PAR, Coulter said. EMC has had the most interesting products, according to respondents, every year since the survey was first conducted.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Cloud Security Startup Lightspin Emerges From Stealth
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  11/24/2020
Look Beyond the 'Big 5' in Cyberattacks
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/25/2020
Why Vulnerable Code Is Shipped Knowingly
Chris Eng, Chief Research Officer, Veracode,  11/30/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: We are really excited about our new two tone authentication system!
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-4126
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-01
HCL iNotes is susceptible to a sensitive cookie exposure vulnerability. This can allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to capture the cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session. Fixes are available in HCL Domino and iNotes versions 10.0.1 FP6 and 11.0.1 FP2 and later.
CVE-2020-4129
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-01
HCL Domino is susceptible to a lockout policy bypass vulnerability in the LDAP service. An unauthenticated attacker could use this vulnerability to mount a brute force attack against the LDAP service. Fixes are available in HCL Domino versions 9.0.1 FP10 IF6, 10.0.1 FP6 and 11.0.1 FP1 and later.
CVE-2020-9115
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-01
ManageOne versions 6.5.1.1.B010, 6.5.1.1.B020, 6.5.1.1.B030, 6.5.1.1.B040, ,6.5.1.1.B050, 8.0.0 and 8.0.1 have a command injection vulnerability. An attacker with high privileges may exploit this vulnerability through some operations on the plug-in component. Due to insufficient input validation of ...
CVE-2020-9116
PUBLISHED: 2020-12-01
Huawei FusionCompute versions 6.5.1 and 8.0.0 have a command injection vulnerability. An authenticated, remote attacker can craft specific request to exploit this vulnerability. Due to insufficient verification, this could be exploited to cause the attackers to obtain higher privilege.
CVE-2020-14193
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-30
Affected versions of Automation for Jira - Server allowed remote attackers to read and render files as mustache templates in files inside the WEB-INF/classes & <jira-installation>/jira/bin directories via a template injection vulnerability in Jira smart values using mustache partials. The ...