Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

01:27 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly

CryptoWall 2.0 Has Some New Tricks

New ransomware variant uses TOR on command-and-control traffic and can execute 64-bit code from its 32-bit dropper.

Ransomware continues to become more sophisticated, according to new analysis of CryptoWall 2.0 released by Cisco Talos Security and Intelligence Research Group today. The latest variant uses TOR to encrypt command-and-control traffic, uses anti-VM and anti-emulation checks to impede identification, and can execute 64-bit code directly from a 32-bit dropper.

CryptoWall 2.0 is delivered via email attachments, malicious PDFs, and exploit kits. It uses a privilege-escalation vulnerability in X86-based machines to exploit 32-bit OSes -- starting with Windows Vista -- and includes a 64-bit DLL to work on AMD64 systems.

The malware variant takes advantage of the Wow64 (Windows 32-bit on Windows 64-bit) environment to switch back and forth between 32-bit and 64-bit as need be. As the report describes:

Another interesting aspect of the sample that we analyzed is that includes some 64 bit code (and an exploit DLL) directly in its main 32-bit executable. Although the main module is running in 32-bit mode, it is capable of executing all the 64-bit functions it needs.

CryptoWall 2.0 also installs a complete TOR client on victim machines for obfuscating its command-and-control communication. Once connected to a TOR server, it uses a custom Domain Generation Algorithm to generate CryptoWall domain names.

As Talos explains, "CryptoWall 2.0 makes many, many requests once installed." One way to detect CryptoWall is to watch for traffic to a small collection of addresses that the malware uses to identify the outside address for the network the system is operating on: http://wtfismyip.com/text, http://ip-addr.es, http://myexternalip.com/raw, and http://curlmyip.com.

As the blog explains: "It starts with wtfismyip.com and stops after the first successful reply is received. In most situations, this means that it will end up only going to wtfismyip.com (since it is the first entry in the list). Although this is a fairly generic request, this shouldn’t be a very common occurrence in an enterprise network and can serve as a potential network indicator of this malware."

For more details, see the Cisco Talos Group blog post here.

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
1/7/2015 | 11:25:15 AM
Excellent and in-depth
Excellent article.  In-depth and well explained.
7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-12
Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow an unauthenticated user to enumerate users via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the QueryComponentRendererValue!Default.jspa endpoint. The affected versions are before version 8.5.13, from version 8.6.0 before 8.13.5, and fro...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
In the Linux kernel 5.11 through 5.12.2, isotp_setsockopt in net/can/isotp.c allows privilege escalation to root by leveraging a use-after-free. (This does not affect earlier versions that lack CAN ISOTP SF_BROADCAST support.)
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
A flaw was found in the hivex library in versions before 1.3.20. It is caused due to a lack of bounds check within the hivex_open function. An attacker could input a specially crafted Windows Registry (hive) file which would cause hivex to read memory beyond its normal bounds or cause the program to...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in versions before 7.0.11 and before 6.9.12, where a division by zero in WaveImage() of MagickCore/visual-effects.c may trigger undefined behavior via a crafted image file submitted to an application using ImageMagick. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to ...
PUBLISHED: 2021-05-11
A flaw was found in ImageMagick in versions before 7.0.11, where a division by zero ConvertXYZToJzazbz() of MagickCore/colorspace.c may trigger undefined behavior via a crafted image file that is submitted by an attacker and processed by an application using ImageMagick. The highest threat from this...