Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

01:27 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly

CryptoWall 2.0 Has Some New Tricks

New ransomware variant uses TOR on command-and-control traffic and can execute 64-bit code from its 32-bit dropper.

Ransomware continues to become more sophisticated, according to new analysis of CryptoWall 2.0 released by Cisco Talos Security and Intelligence Research Group today. The latest variant uses TOR to encrypt command-and-control traffic, uses anti-VM and anti-emulation checks to impede identification, and can execute 64-bit code directly from a 32-bit dropper.

CryptoWall 2.0 is delivered via email attachments, malicious PDFs, and exploit kits. It uses a privilege-escalation vulnerability in X86-based machines to exploit 32-bit OSes -- starting with Windows Vista -- and includes a 64-bit DLL to work on AMD64 systems.

The malware variant takes advantage of the Wow64 (Windows 32-bit on Windows 64-bit) environment to switch back and forth between 32-bit and 64-bit as need be. As the report describes:

Another interesting aspect of the sample that we analyzed is that includes some 64 bit code (and an exploit DLL) directly in its main 32-bit executable. Although the main module is running in 32-bit mode, it is capable of executing all the 64-bit functions it needs.

CryptoWall 2.0 also installs a complete TOR client on victim machines for obfuscating its command-and-control communication. Once connected to a TOR server, it uses a custom Domain Generation Algorithm to generate CryptoWall domain names.

As Talos explains, "CryptoWall 2.0 makes many, many requests once installed." One way to detect CryptoWall is to watch for traffic to a small collection of addresses that the malware uses to identify the outside address for the network the system is operating on: http://wtfismyip.com/text, http://ip-addr.es, http://myexternalip.com/raw, and http://curlmyip.com.

As the blog explains: "It starts with wtfismyip.com and stops after the first successful reply is received. In most situations, this means that it will end up only going to wtfismyip.com (since it is the first entry in the list). Although this is a fairly generic request, this shouldn’t be a very common occurrence in an enterprise network and can serve as a potential network indicator of this malware."

For more details, see the Cisco Talos Group blog post here.

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Apprentice
1/7/2015 | 11:25:15 AM
Excellent and in-depth
Excellent article.  In-depth and well explained.
HackerOne Drops Mobile Voting App Vendor Voatz
Dark Reading Staff 3/30/2020
Limited-Time Free Offers to Secure the Enterprise Amid COVID-19
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  3/31/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-06
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel through 5.6.2. mpol_parse_str in mm/mempolicy.c has a stack-based out-of-bounds write because an empty nodelist is mishandled during mount option parsing, aka CID-aa9f7d5172fa.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-05
An issue was discovered in libgpac.a in GPAC 0.8.0, as demonstrated by MP4Box. audio_sample_entry_Read in isomedia/box_code_base.c does not properly decide when to make gf_isom_box_del calls. This leads to various use-after-free outcomes involving mdia_Read, gf_isom_delete_movie, and gf_isom_parse_m...
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-05
PRTG Network Monitor before allows remote unauthenticated attackers to obtain information about probes running or the server itself (CPU usage, memory, Windows version, and internal statistics) via an HTTP request, as demonstrated by type=probes to login.htm or index.htm.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-05
The Search Meter plugin through 2.13.2 for WordPress allows user input introduced in the search bar to be any formula. The attacker could achieve remote code execution via CSV injection if a wp-admin/index.php?page=search-meter Export is performed.
PUBLISHED: 2020-04-04
3xLOGIC Infinias eIDC32 2.213 devices with Web 1.107 allow Authentication Bypass via CMD.HTM?CMD= because authentication depends on the client side's interpretation of the <KEY>MYKEY</KEY> substring.