Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Vulnerabilities / Threats

1/6/2015
01:27 PM
Sara Peters
Sara Peters
Quick Hits
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

CryptoWall 2.0 Has Some New Tricks

New ransomware variant uses TOR on command-and-control traffic and can execute 64-bit code from its 32-bit dropper.

Ransomware continues to become more sophisticated, according to new analysis of CryptoWall 2.0 released by Cisco Talos Security and Intelligence Research Group today. The latest variant uses TOR to encrypt command-and-control traffic, uses anti-VM and anti-emulation checks to impede identification, and can execute 64-bit code directly from a 32-bit dropper.

CryptoWall 2.0 is delivered via email attachments, malicious PDFs, and exploit kits. It uses a privilege-escalation vulnerability in X86-based machines to exploit 32-bit OSes -- starting with Windows Vista -- and includes a 64-bit DLL to work on AMD64 systems.

The malware variant takes advantage of the Wow64 (Windows 32-bit on Windows 64-bit) environment to switch back and forth between 32-bit and 64-bit as need be. As the report describes:

Another interesting aspect of the sample that we analyzed is that includes some 64 bit code (and an exploit DLL) directly in its main 32-bit executable. Although the main module is running in 32-bit mode, it is capable of executing all the 64-bit functions it needs.

CryptoWall 2.0 also installs a complete TOR client on victim machines for obfuscating its command-and-control communication. Once connected to a TOR server, it uses a custom Domain Generation Algorithm to generate CryptoWall domain names.

As Talos explains, "CryptoWall 2.0 makes many, many requests once installed." One way to detect CryptoWall is to watch for traffic to a small collection of addresses that the malware uses to identify the outside address for the network the system is operating on: http://wtfismyip.com/text, http://ip-addr.es, http://myexternalip.com/raw, and http://curlmyip.com.

As the blog explains: "It starts with wtfismyip.com and stops after the first successful reply is received. In most situations, this means that it will end up only going to wtfismyip.com (since it is the first entry in the list). Although this is a fairly generic request, this shouldn’t be a very common occurrence in an enterprise network and can serve as a potential network indicator of this malware."

For more details, see the Cisco Talos Group blog post here.

Sara Peters is Senior Editor at Dark Reading and formerly the editor-in-chief of Enterprise Efficiency. Prior that she was senior editor for the Computer Security Institute, writing and speaking about virtualization, identity management, cybersecurity law, and a myriad ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
markjhouse
50%
50%
markjhouse,
User Rank: Apprentice
1/7/2015 | 11:25:15 AM
Excellent and in-depth
Excellent article.  In-depth and well explained.
NSA Appoints Rob Joyce as Cyber Director
Dark Reading Staff 1/15/2021
Vulnerability Management Has a Data Problem
Tal Morgenstern, Co-Founder & Chief Product Officer, Vulcan Cyber,  1/14/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11997
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-19
Apache Guacamole 1.2.0 and earlier do not consistently restrict access to connection history based on user visibility. If multiple users share access to the same connection, those users may be able to see which other users have accessed that connection, as well as the IP addresses from which that co...
CVE-2020-27266
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-19
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, a client-side control vulnerability in the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows physically proximate attackers to bypass user authentication checks via Bluetooth Low Energy.
CVE-2020-27268
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-19
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, a client-side control vulnerability in the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications allows physically proximate attackers to bypass checks for default PINs via Bluetooth Low Energy.
CVE-2020-27269
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-19
In SOOIL Developments Co., Ltd Diabecare RS, AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A, the communication protocol of the insulin pump and its AnyDana-i and AnyDana-A mobile applications lacks replay protection measures, which allows unauthenticated, physically proximate attackers to replay communication sequences vi...
CVE-2020-28707
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-19
The Stockdio Historical Chart plugin before 2.8.1 for WordPress is affected by Cross Site Scripting (XSS) via stockdio_chart_historical-wp.js in wp-content/plugins/stockdio-historical-chart/assets/ because the origin of a postMessage() event is not validated. The stockdio_eventer function listens fo...