Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

1/20/2017
04:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Corporate Legal Counsels Fret Over Cybersecurity

BDO Consulting survey shows in-house legal executives cite data breaches, cross-border data transfers, as risks with e-discovery.

A majority of in-house legal counsels at US corporations view data breaches and cross-border data privacy regulations as among their biggest e-discovery related legal risks.

BDO Consulting, a company that provides financial, business, and technology advisory services, recently surveyed over 100 senior legal executives at organizations ranging in size from $100 million to over $5 billion.

Seventy four percent, or nearly three in four of the respondents, pointed to data breaches as one of their top data-related risks, while 68% say the legal department in their organization was more engaged with cybersecurity compared to 12 months ago as result of such concerns.

"E-discovery systems collect, store and process highly sensitive information that is a potential goldmine for hackers," said Shahryar Shaghaghi, head of BDO International’s cybersecurity and technology advisory Services practice in the report. "These systems and the data they contain require strong risk management oversight as well as proper cybersecurity defenses and protocols."

In situations where third-party service providers manage the data for enterprises, more than one quarter of the survey respondents (27%) say they are unaware of the risk posed to their organization by third-parties.

"The challenges of e-discovery—and protecting the data involved in the process—increase each year," BDO said in its report.

The growing ubiquity and use of mobile devices, cloud services, social media, and the Internet of Things, have combined to drive a massive increase in the volume of enterprise data that might need to be retained and protected from an e-discovery perspective.

Exacerbating the issue is the constantly evolving nature of regulatory and data privacy laws, especially those involving cross-border investigations and compliance with varied local laws, the BDO report said. Sixty percent of the corporate counsel in BDOs survey—a full 9% higher than last year—pointed to numerous, often conflicting international security and privacy laws as their biggest challenge in dealing with cross-border e-discovery.

The biggest cross-border headaches appear tied to the move last year by the European Union to invalidate the Safe Harbor agreement governing the transfer of data between companies in the EU and the US. Thirty-seven percent of the BDO respondents cited that specific development as presenting the biggest cross-border problems.

Data breaches and cross border issues are not the only concern. The survey also revealed a high-level of unease over data-related legal threats posed by the adoption and use of mobile devices in enterprise environments: 35% of in-house counsels worry about BYOD policies and 32% cite mobile device management concerns.

Data preservation and over-preservation, data disposal practices, and data encryption all were cited as other concerns by the in-house counsels.

Somewhat unsurprisingly, the BDO survey reflected increased attention on better information governance overall as a way to make the e-discover process. The goal increasingly for instance is to enable a sharper focus on the most relevant and responsive data during e-discovery or an investigation by looking for and culling irrelevant data from enterprise systems.

"How an organization manages data overall has a massive impact on e-discovery," says Judy Selby, managing director in BDO's consulting and technology advisory services group.

Too many companies have a tendency to store all the data they generate because storage is cheap and they don't have an adequate retention policy.

"If you get a discovery request in for a certain type of document, the less data you have within your corporation and the better organized it is, the better able you are to respond," Selby says.

Related stories:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Post a Comment
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-21439
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
DoS attack can be performed when an email contains specially designed URL in the body. It can lead to the high CPU usage and cause low quality of service, or in extreme case bring the system to a halt. This issue affects: OTRS AG ((OTRS)) Community Edition 6.0.x version 6.0.1 and later versions. OTR...
CVE-2021-23394
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-13
The package studio-42/elfinder before 2.1.58 are vulnerable to Remote Code Execution (RCE) via execution of PHP code in a .phar file. NOTE: This only applies if the server parses .phar files as PHP.
CVE-2021-34682
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
Receita Federal IRPF 2021 1.7 allows a man-in-the-middle attack against the update feature.
CVE-2021-31811
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an OutOfMemory-Exception while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.
CVE-2021-31812
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-12
In Apache PDFBox, a carefully crafted PDF file can trigger an infinite loop while loading the file. This issue affects Apache PDFBox version 2.0.23 and prior 2.0.x versions.