Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

Competition May Be Driving Surge in Botnets, Spam

Market challenge from Nugache botnet may be pushing Storm's operators to expand, researcher says

A price war may be at least partially responsible for the recent increase in spam and botnet activity on the Internet, a researcher suggested this week.

The operators of Nugache, one of the Web's most sophisticated emerging botnets, appear to be expanding their network and slashing prices to customers who want to use it to distribute spam, according to researcher Paul Henry, vice president of technology evangelism at Secure Computing Corp. (Nasdaq: SCUR).

"We have seen offers that will allow a customer to send a million emails for under $100," Henry says. "If you send more than 10 million, the price drops to under $80 per million. There's a price war going on, and Nugache is becoming the bargain basement."

The new low prices may be partly driving the recent increase in foreign-language spam that many users have been finding in their filters and emailboxes over the past few weeks, Henry suggests. Recent reports indicate that spam comprises more than 95 percent of all email. (See Spam Reaching Record Volumes, Researchers Say.)

"One of the major differences between Storm and Nugache is that Storm appears to do a much better job of matching the language of the message with the recipient," he says. "If you look at the foreign language spam you're getting, the characteristics are not the same as the spam that comes from Storm. A lot of this is coming from Nugache."

However, it is possible that Storm's recent resurgence is partly fueled by its operators' desire to compete with Nugache, Henry suggests. Storm may be expanding its footprint -- and its operators may have cut their usage prices -- in order to meet the new competition, he says. (See Storm Darkens Christmas, Takes Aim at New Year's.)

"One of the common characteristics we're seeing in botnets is that they're not only looking to expand, but they're looking for ways to hold onto the [zombies] that they already have," Henry notes. "They'll do anything to avoid being detected by antivirus or other signature-based tools.

"We've actually seen some [botnets] installing a hacked version of the Clam AV software, so that the end station will show up as being protected by AV [thus avoiding removal from the botnet], but won't be able to detect the botnet itself. In other cases, the botnet will actually patch new vulnerabilities on the client, so that [the client] won't be red-flagged and taken off the botnet."

Aside from price, the botnets are likely competing on the basis of size and reach. It's difficult to estimate Nugache's size, because it uses a peer-to-peer architecture that doesn't require a command-and-control system and employs fast flux technology that allows its devices to change IP addresses every 300 seconds, Henry says.

But even though its exact size isn't known, it seems clear that Nugache is large enough to compete with Storm, Henry says.

Although it is at least six months older than Storm and has been slower to grow, Nugache operates in much the same way as Storm, spreading like a worm, evolving and repacking itself to avoid signature-based defenses, and functioning without a static command and control system. Enterprises will generally use the same defenses to fight both botnets, Henry says.

"The one thing that the threat of another bot might do is accelerate enterprises' decisions to move forward with more effective tools than the signature-based products they're currently using," Henry says. "Clearly, those tools aren't much use against these types of botnets."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
How to Better Secure Your Microsoft 365 Environment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/25/2021
Attackers Leave Stolen Credentials Searchable on Google
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-3331
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-27
WinSCP before 5.17.10 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary programs when the URL handler encounters a crafted URL that loads session settings. (For example, this is exploitable in a default installation in which WinSCP is the handler for sftp:// URLs.)
CVE-2021-3326
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-27
The iconv function in the GNU C Library (aka glibc or libc6) 2.32 and earlier, when processing invalid input sequences in the ISO-2022-JP-3 encoding, fails an assertion in the code path and aborts the program, potentially resulting in a denial of service.
CVE-2021-22641
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-27
A heap-based buffer overflow issue has been identified in the way the application processes project files, allowing an attacker to craft a special project file that may allow arbitrary code execution on the Tellus Lite V-Simulator and V-Server Lite (versions prior to 4.0.10.0).
CVE-2021-22653
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-27
Multiple out-of-bounds write issues have been identified in the way the application processes project files, allowing an attacker to craft a special project file that may allow arbitrary code execution on the Tellus Lite V-Simulator and V-Server Lite (versions prior to 4.0.10.0).
CVE-2021-22655
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-27
Multiple out-of-bounds read issues have been identified in the way the application processes project files, allowing an attacker to craft a special project file that may allow arbitrary code execution on the Tellus Lite V-Simulator and V-Server Lite (versions prior to 4.0.10.0).