Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

6/4/2019
02:00 PM
Daniel P. Kent
Daniel P. Kent
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

Why FedRAMP Matters to Non-Federal Organizations

Commercial companies should explore how FedRAMP can help mitigate risk as they move to the cloud.

The word "compliance" is not a popular one for any technology provider. Whether an organization is in retail, manufacturing, healthcare, or government, navigating complex regulatory environments and processes can hinder technology advancement. While it's often considered a "necessary evil," compliance helps companies maintain high security and data management standards and mitigate security risk, which in the long run is good for everyone. We need to look for better ways to be compliant and still innovate.

Consider the Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP). FedRAMP is a "government-wide program that provides a standardized approach to security assessment authorization" for cloud service provider (CSP) solutions. FedRAMP ensures cloud offerings are secure enough to be used by federal agencies, including agencies handling sensitive information and data.

FedRAMP was introduced in 2011 to support the Cloud First policy (now the Cloud Smart policy), which aimed to accelerate the adoption of secure cloud solutions among federal agencies. Rather than allow agencies to continue using individual requirements, FedRAMP continues to streamline authorizations by creating unified standards based on the risk needs of agencies. The goal is to improve agencies' protection of information, streamline and reduce costs of security assessments, and better enable agencies to modernize operations with secure cloud solutions.

This movement to capitalize on the benefits of the cloud is not exclusive to federal agencies — far from it. FedRAMP was created to accelerate adoption within federal government, but non-federal organizations are starting to benefit as well, including critical infrastructure and commercial entities.

FedRAMP for Critical Infrastructure
Any non-federal organization working directly with the government will likely need to comply with the same FedRAMP requirements as agencies themselves. This includes universities and state agencies receiving federal grants, as well as defense contractors that support agency operations in cloud environments. Any program supported by federal funding for non-federal organization needs to adhere to FedRAMP guidelines, and so will the technology providers involved in that program.

Perhaps the biggest non-federal group of organizations looking at FedRAMP solutions today are those in critical infrastructure. Some organizations — for instance, a manufacturer providing components for a missile system — work directly with federal agencies and are required by law to use FedRAMP solutions. However, other organizations across banking, healthcare, insurance, and utility industries are being directed to FedRAMP, too, because these are highly regulated sectors. So, federal agencies are pushing companies in these industries to better ensure the security of citizens' personal information.

Like federal agencies themselves, critical infrastructure companies are feeling the pressure to modernize operations with the cloud while simultaneously being cautious because of security concerns. These organizations are weary, and rightfully so, of being tomorrow's data breach headline. FedRAMP authorized cloud solutions can ease concerns by delivering the same security as federal agencies and exploring the latest cloud solutions vendors have to offer.

Using FedRAMP to Guide Commercial Investment
Commercial businesses across industries understand the benefits that cloud solutions offer in terms of greater operational flexibility and reduced costs, but they don't face the requirements or direct government pressure to use FedRAMP-authorized products. In fact, not all FedRAMP-approved solutions are even available to commercial customers. This depends on how agreements are set up between the software-as-a-service provider and the federal agency that sponsored the authorization, according to FedRAMP guidelines. Of the roughly 17,000 cloud applications available, only around 300 are approved by FedRAMP, and only a limited selection of those will be available for commercial use.

So, why should commercial organizations pay attention to FedRAMP? The answer is trust and confidence.

By understanding the federal cloud marketplace, commercial organizations can identify cloud solutions that can benefit their adoption strategy and be assured those solutions meet the highest security standards. Not only do FedRAMP solutions undergo hundreds of security control checks, the program also includes continuous monitoring that requires providers to immediately flag any product issues to the sponsoring agency.  This security transparency further gives everyone — federal agencies, critical infrastructure, or other commercial companies — more confidence in both the cloud solution and the CSP providing it.

And while a FedRAMP solution may not be authorized for commercial use, many CSPs are leveraging the benefits of going through the validation process and incorporating those into their commercial solutions. In other words, many commercial products are becoming more secure as a result of CSPs investing in FedRAMP. Tracking the technology providers that have achieved FedRAMP authorization gives commercial companies a good sense of where to look for advanced, highly secure cloud solutions.

A "Universal FedRAMP" Future
The FedRAMP program today is a primary driver in the acceleration of cloud adoption for federal agencies. While the program is still evolving, it has undoubtedly delivered, providing organizations with trusted cloud solutions that federal agencies can be confident using.

As the program matures, there will be an opportunity to embrace a more consistent, "universal FedRAMP" experience which will guide secure cloud investments across non-government. For now, commercial companies should be proactive in exploring how FedRAMP can help mitigate risk on their journey to the cloud.

Related Content:

Daniel Kent is the Chief Technology Officer for the Cisco Systems Public Sector organization. His group assists government transformation by delivering technologies, services, and offerings into public sector vertical markets including DoD, education, government, and ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-19040
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
KairosDB through 1.2.2 has XSS in view.html because of showErrorMessage in js/graph.js, as demonstrated by view.html?q= with a '"sampling":{"value":"<script>' substring.
CVE-2019-19041
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An issue was discovered in Xorux Lpar2RRD 6.11 and Stor2RRD 2.61, as distributed in Xorux 2.41. They do not correctly verify the integrity of an upgrade package before processing it. As a result, official upgrade packages can be modified to inject an arbitrary Bash script that will be executed by th...
CVE-2019-19012
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
An integer overflow in the search_in_range function in regexec.c in Oniguruma 6.x before 6.9.4_rc2 leads to an out-of-bounds read, in which the offset of this read is under the control of an attacker. (This only affects the 32-bit compiled version). Remote attackers can cause a denial-of-service or ...
CVE-2019-19022
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
iTerm2 through 3.3.6 has potentially insufficient documentation about the presence of search history in com.googlecode.iterm2.plist, which might allow remote attackers to obtain sensitive information, as demonstrated by searching for the NoSyncSearchHistory string in .plist files within public Git r...
CVE-2019-19035
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-17
jhead 3.03 is affected by: heap-based buffer over-read. The impact is: Denial of service. The component is: ReadJpegSections and process_SOFn in jpgfile.c. The attack vector is: Open a specially crafted JPEG file.