Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

3/26/2012
11:26 PM
50%
50%

Vetting The Security Of Cloud Service Providers

A registry offered by the Cloud Security Alliance allows customers to compare the security measures of participating service providers. Is that enough to make cloud more secure?

A major step in selecting a good cloud provider is researching and comparing the security measures that each provider uses to keep its customers' data safe.

Today, conducting due diligence requires contacting each potential provider to gain access to independent audits and security assessments, possibly requiring the signing of a nondisclosure agreement. The process can be onerous: A company considering a handful of cloud vendors has to request the security information from each, translate their internal documents into a common language, and then compare the security specifications.

"They will look at six different companies, and they will get different controls, different issues that have been identified," says Jon Heimerl, director of strategy for Solutionary, a managed security services provider. "There will be a lot in common, obviously, but things are phrased differently and built differently between all those companies."

To tame the confusion, the Cloud Security Alliance launched the Security, Trust and Assurance Registry (STAR) to give potential cloud customers a central database from which they can compare providers' security assertions. Participating providers submit their answers to a self-assessment questionnaire, attesting to the security controls and monitoring that they have put in place to protect customer data.

While only four providers, including Solutionary and Microsoft Office 365, have submitted self-assessments to date, a much larger number are currently working through the documents, according to the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA).

"It should create a little bit more competition to make security part of the differentiation between services," says Jim Reavis, founder and executive director of the CSA. "I think by the end of this year, we will have a very complete set of providers on the site."

Using the service gives customers a way to compare providers' security rather than requesting an audit. Last year, a Ponemon Institute study found that 69 percent of providers placed the responsibility for security with their customers, while only 35 percent of customers believed they needed to worry about data security. Yet most cloud service providers will not allow most clients to audit their security because they cannot accommodate a large number of such requests.

"Allowing potentially thousands of customers to audit our services would not be a scalable practice and might compromise security," says Tim Rains, director of Microsoft's Trustworthy Computing group.

But the company understands that before committing their data to the cloud, companies want to know that their provider will treat their sensitive information in accordance with their governance and compliance requirements. For that reason, Microsoft supplied one of the first self-assessments to the STAR program.

"Cloud providers that provide potential customers with an appropriate level of transparency will go a long way in building their trust," Rains says. "Not only does this include how a vendor's online services are being operated, but also how those online services are being developed."

The 50-page document covers compliance, governance, physical-security measures, human-resources security, and a variety of information-security policies. The information requested by the CSA questionnaire is based on the efforts of working groups within the CSA and brings together customer and vendor concerns, says Solutionary's Heimerl.

In the end, Solutionary and others hope that potential customers will use the list to find companies whose security practices match their requirements.

"Customers now ask, 'How am I going to find out where the good cloud providers are in this space?'" he says. "The registry will become the short list."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
How to Identify Cobalt Strike on Your Network
Zohar Buber, Security Analyst,  11/18/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-28331
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W devices have Improper Access Control. Affected Version(s): 2.5.1.8. The Barco wePresent WiPG-1600W device has an SSH daemon included in the firmware image. By default, the SSH daemon is disabled and does not start at system boot. The system initialization scripts read a de...
CVE-2020-28928
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
In musl libc through 1.2.1, wcsnrtombs mishandles particular combinations of destination buffer size and source character limit, as demonstrated by an invalid write access (buffer overflow).
CVE-2020-28994
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
A SQL injection vulnerability was discovered in Karenderia Multiple Restaurant System, affecting versions 5.4.2 and below. The vulnerability allows for an unauthenticated attacker to perform various tasks such as modifying and leaking all contents of the database.
CVE-2020-13620
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
Fastweb FASTGate GPON FGA2130FWB devices through 2020-05-26 allow CSRF via the router administration web panel, leading to an attacker's ability to perform administrative actions such as modifying the configuration.
CVE-2020-13942
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-24
It is possible to inject malicious OGNL or MVEL scripts into the /context.json public endpoint. This was partially fixed in 1.5.1 but a new attack vector was found. In Apache Unomi version 1.5.2 scripts are now completely filtered from the input. It is highly recommended to upgrade to the latest ava...