Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

11/19/2014
09:57 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

The Rise Of The Resilient Mobile Botnet

New report on what researchers call one of the 'most sophisticated mobile botnets online' shows how profitable mobile malware has become.

A new report out today shows how mobile malware and mobile botnets are quickly catching up in sophistication with their PC brethren. Researchers at Lookout call this malware family one of the most sophisticated mobile botnets running online today.

Dubbed NotCompatible, the botnet and the mobile malware family that drives it turn mobile devices into TCP proxies that can be used in any number of creative ways, including to send spam, commit click fraud, employ brute-force passwords, and initiate fraudulent ticket purchases. That's not anything new, but what makes this threat different is the level of sophistication in the backend of NotCompatible to resist reverse engineering and takedown efforts by the security community.

"Our research is on this malware family we call NotCompatible shows that as mobile is becoming ubiquitous, mobile malware is starting to reach parity with the sophistication of PC malware," says Jeremy Linden, security product manager for Lookout. "To date we haven't seen another mobile botnet that's nearly as sophisticated and definitely not as long-lived as NotCompatible."

According to Linden, the botnet has continuously run for two years now. However, while the monetary modus operandi has remained the same over that time period, the malware and botnet infrastructure has recently undergone a massive overhaul. With that reworking, the network's developer has tipped his or her hand as to how profitable NotCompatible really is due to the complicated resiliency features built in now, he says.

"Clearly someone put a lot of thought and time into developing this architecture," Linden says, "which means that these tactics are actually paying out for them."

Some of the features of the architecture include a redundant command and control server architecture that's geographically dispersed around the world to help "absorb the impact of takedowns," as well as authentication of infected nodes through a central gateway server to prevent researchers from trying to connect as impostor bots in order to listen in on what the criminals are doing. Additionally, NotCompatible utilizes peer-to-peer communication between the nodes for added resiliency.

"Even if you take down the command and control server that one infected node is connecting to, that infected node can actually receive commands that are relayed through other infected nodes in that mesh network in order to keep the network alive and propagating," Linden says.

According to Linden, the rise in NotCompatible is a good lesson that security researchers should pay more attention to mobile threats over longer periods of time.

"A lot of time researchers will classify a certain piece of malware and say 'We've got it!' and file it off in a shelf and not really study it," he says. "That kind of approach wouldn't really have worked with NotCompatible. A researcher may have written it off when they first discovered it because it was just a proxy server and didn't seem to be doing that much damage. But studying it for years showed how sophisticated this network did become."

Meanwhile, enterprises should be on the lookout for the threat that this growing class of botnets may pose for them. While Lookout hasn't observed the botnet being used to bypass network protections, Linden warns that as completely unrestricted proxies, the infected nodes present attackers with the opportunity to bypass the kind of perimeter defenses networks use.

"This is a privileged device that's moving between porous network boundaries, being used for personal use and then potentially also used for business," Linden says. "If one of these devices does end up behind someone's firewall, it offers the operator of the botnet unfettered access to the juicy center of an enterprise network."

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3738
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
CVE-2019-3739
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
CVE-2019-3740
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.
CVE-2019-3756
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P3 (6.6.0.3), contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Information relating to the backend database gets disclosed to low-privileged RSA Archer users' UI under certain error conditions.
CVE-2019-3758
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P2 (6.6.0.2), contain an improper authentication vulnerability. The vulnerability allows sysadmins to create user accounts with insufficient credentials. Unauthenticated attackers could gain unauthorized access to the system using those accounts.