Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

4/18/2016
01:10 PM
Kennet Westby
Kennet Westby
Commentary
50%
50%

Privacy Debate: Apple & Google Today; AWS or Azure Tomorrow?

Why the recent fight over mobile phone security and encryption is moving to the cloud.

The history of collaboration between government and the tech industry in the name of national security has ebbed and flowed for decades. From tapping copper telephone lines to bypassing the passcode on a mobile phone, the next frontier in the privacy/encryption debate will be over apps and cloud-based storage. Just as innovation has advanced the nature of how we communicate and collaborate, tech companies outside of telecom and mobile need to start paying attention to these developments, specifically with respect to cloud service providers like Amazon.

The concept of using encryption in a broad federated environment that protects data from the bad guys but still provides decryption capabilities for authorized stake holders including government participants are not new concepts. The financial and payments industries have had to manage these programs for years. Most of those organizations would not characterize the decryption methods implemented as a back door or weakened security as Apple has. The new challenge is how or whether applying these methods in new environments and platforms that affect an individual’s or private organization’s right to privacy is the best approach. There is a litany of potential unintended consequences. A major one could be a significant government interference on the free market competitiveness of technology companies.

As the matters surrounding Apple and Google continue to unfold, new information around law enforcement inquiries will come to light. The FBI’s fight against Apple has faded from mainstream media headlines for now, but ambiguities in the law have yet to be resolved in the United States. That means we can expect to see a greater discussion around amending privacy laws to address the handling of mobile devices and applications. In fact, a draft bill from Senators Dianne Feinstein and Richard Burr leaked last week is focused directly at providing the government legal ground to require device and cloud technology providers to enable government’s access to encrypted data.

Gain insight into the latest threats and emerging best practices for managing them. Attend the Security Track at Interop Las Vegas, May 2-6. Register now!

These matters are further advanced in Europe, with the French National Assembly recently considering an amendment to its counterterrorism bill that actively enforces decryption with increased penalties to private companies and their executives who do not design their own encryption. It wouldn’t be a stretch of the imagination to see such measures gain popularity back in the U.S., as lawmakers scramble to find a means to a larger policy solution.

The Board is listening

This creates a prescient reminder for board members and CISOs alike. A 2015 survey by the New York Stock Exchange, for example, found that more than 80 percent of public company board members are discussing cybersecurity at most or all of their respective boardroom meetings.

And yet, a wider public discussion of the issues has, largely, been lacking. Perhaps that’s borne out of procrastination. But what’s clear is that developing a privacy framework that satisfies as many concerns as possible should be a top-of-list agenda item. For the protection of their business model, and customers, mobile platform developers and cloud service providers need to be at the table during these discussions to ensure that laws do not provide government agencies too much leeway while also living up to their civic duty to not undermine public safety.

Because lawmakers have been slow to adapt to the pace of technology, criminal investigators have sought to manipulate centuries-old legal precedents as a means of recovering what they consider critical information in the wake of a terror or criminal attack. Solutions that are secure but which also promote privacy are essential. However, this can only be achieved through a proactive and cooperative approach. Can the security industry, working with law enforcement, curtail the next generation of legal challenges, ensuring that Amazon or Microsoft doesn’t become the next Apple? That’s an open question with the future, much like the potential legal challenges to come, very much up in the clouds.

Related Content:

 

Kennet Westby is a founding partner of Coalfire and serves as its president and chief security strategist. Mr. Westby has over 20 years of leadership experience in IT security, IT controls design and implementations. Mr. Westby provides cyber risk advisory to some of the ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%
Joe Stanganelli,
User Rank: Ninja
4/20/2016 | 6:36:47 PM
Uh-oh
Cloud providers have already lost tens of billions of dollars since the Snowden revelations.  If this bill gets passed, expect more severe economic losses and more offshoring.
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...