Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

3/21/2018
11:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Online Sandboxing: A Stash for Exfiltrated Data?

SafeBreach researchers extend leaky sandbox research to show how services like VirusTotal and Hybrid Analysis could be used to steal data from air-gapped systems.

Online sandboxing services are an extremely important resource for threat hunters to use to consolidate knowledge and collaborate about emerging threats. However, new research out this week shows that the tables can be turned on organizations using services like VirusTotal or Hybrid Analysis by using them as a way to exfiltrate data from heavily locked down systems. 

Published by researchers with SafeBreach, the report released today adds a new layer to previous work the team did on leaky sandbox services used by cloud-based antivirus platforms. Presented at BlackHat last summer, that earlier research demonstrated how researchers could exfiltrate data off of air-gapped and otherwise disconnected systems by tricking cloud-enhanced anti virus agents into sending stolen data onto a criminal's server. 

This time around the SafeBreach team used that same principle of hiding a wolf in sheep's clothing to offer a proof-of-concept for how online sandboxing services could be used as an outbound channel for stolen sensitive data. Unlike the previous research, this time around the hidden data never needs for an attacker to communicate out of the sandbox in order for them to find their stash.

Here is the way it works: a piece of custom malware is designed to be found on the system and uploaded to an online sandboxing service like VirusTotal, either by a human security analyst or a tool integrated with the online service. Unbeknownst to the victim, the stolen data is encoded and embedded in that malware. And so is a secret and searchable passphrase.

"One of the main objectives that needs to be addressed by the attacker is how to make the data that they incorporate into the malware visible to him - to be identified by him after the malware is uploaded to the server - but still be hidden enough that any other user cannot identify that the data is (taken) from an organization, or from any malicious contents inside it," says Dor Azouri, one of the primary researchers for SafeBreach on this project.

Azouri explains that this can be achieved by developing a "magic" string of text and either encrypting or encoding it in such a way that the attacker can make a simple query into the public sandboxing platform in order to pull up that specific piece of malware that's been uploaded to the database.

By passively collecting the data in this way, the attacker doesn't need to emit outbound network traffic or run an HTTP server or authoritative DNS server, according to Azouri, noting that the process is very low-profile and can be done on even extremely isolated systems. The downside, he says, is that the attacker must know - or at least bet heavily - that their targeted victim is using an online sandbox engine as part of their normal security processes.

According to a VirusTotal spokesperson, the SafeBreach research presented here isn't a bug in VirusTotal. It is just a way for attackers to misuse the same kind of feature you'd have in any number of services widely used by enterprises today that allow the uploading, publishing and retrieving of data. Of course, the point from SafeBreach is that this method is meant to be used as a last-mile connection between an attacker and an otherwise well-fortified system. A sensitive system like this wouldn't be using any other kind of SaaS-based information sharing platform, but the security team might not think twice about sending off a sample to VirusTotal from that system.

Nevertheless, VirusTotal's spokesperson contends that this isn't a likely or practical channel for attackers.

"The approach laid out by Safebreach does not make practical sense from an attacker perspective," the spokesperson says. "As an attacker, you don't want to use a channel that is being inspected by the whole security industry to exfiltrate data when there are thousands of other public internet services that could accomplish the same thing much more discreetly.”

Related Content:

 Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two cybersecurity summits at Interop ITX. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the security track here. Early Bird Rates expire Friday March 23. Use Promo Code DR200 & save $200.

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/10/2020
Researcher Finds New Office Macro Attacks for MacOS
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  8/7/2020
Healthcare Industry Sees Respite From Attacks in First Half of 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  8/13/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: It's a technique known as breaking out of the sandbox kids.
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
The Changing Face of Threat Intelligence
This special report takes a look at how enterprises are using threat intelligence, as well as emerging best practices for integrating threat intel into security operations and incident response. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-20383
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
ABBYY network license server in ABBYY FineReader 15 before Release 4 (aka 15.0.112.2130) allows escalation of privileges by local users via manipulations involving files and using symbolic links.
CVE-2020-24348
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, has an out-of-bounds read in njs_json_stringify_iterator in njs_json.c.
CVE-2020-24349
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
njs through 0.4.3, used in NGINX, allows control-flow hijack in njs_value_property in njs_value.c. NOTE: the vendor considers the issue to be "fluff" in the NGINX use case because there is no remote attack surface.
CVE-2020-7360
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
An Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427) vulnerability in SmartControl version 4.3.15 and versions released before April 15, 2020 may allow an authenticated user to escalate privileges by placing a specially crafted DLL file in the search path. This issue was fixed in version 1.0.7, which was r...
CVE-2020-24342
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-13
Lua through 5.4.0 allows a stack redzone cross in luaO_pushvfstring because a protection mechanism wrongly calls luaD_callnoyield twice in a row.