Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

2/29/2016
08:00 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Encryption Adoption On The Rise

Rise in breaches, increase in cloud adoption are natural drivers for encryption, but hurdles remain for many organizations worldwide.

SAN FRANCISCO, CA – RSA Conference 2016 – More than half of organizations worldwide are sending sensitive or confidential data to the cloud yet just 37 percent have a consistent encryption strategy.

A new study shows how the epidemic of data breaches has many organizations finally embracing encryption of their sensitive data, but some serious hurdles remain. There's been a big jump in the number of organizations using encryption across the enterprise rather than just as a point solution: 41% say they encryption is adopted extensively in their organizations, an increase from 16% in 2005. The catch, though, is encryption budgets have dropped in the past three years, according to the Ponemon Institute's  2016 Global Encryption Trends Study, commissioned by Thales e-Security and Vormetric Data Security.

Ponemon polled 5,000 IT and business managers in the US, UK, Germany, France, Australia, Japan, Brazil, Mexico, India, Saudi Arabia, and the Russian Federation, for the study, which was commissioned by Thales e-Security and Vormetric Data Security.

Some 15% of respondents say their organizations have no comprehensive strategy for encryption.

Encryption adoption depends on the industry: financial services and healthcare are the biggest users of encryption, which has a lot to do with regulatory pressures. The manufacturing and consumer products industries are the least like to adopt encryption.

As with most security technology adoption, compliance is a big factor driving encryption. More than 60% of respondents say compliance with privacy and security rules are the main reason they are adopting encryption across the organization, while compliance with internal policies (15%) and avoiding a data breach disclosure (8%) ranked much lower.

Surprisingly, human resources and employee data is at the top of the list of most likely encrypted data (62%), followed by payment data (55%), financial records (48%), customer information (36%), and health-related data (20%).

Meanwhile, some 84% of organizations say they will be sending sensitive or confidential data to the cloud in the next two years. The survey didn’t specify how organizations were transferring their sensitive information to the cloud: “We didn’t ask if they were encrypting or using data masking,” says Peter Galvin, vice president of strategy at Thales. But with the data showing the majority going to the cloud in two years with their sensitive data, “they are going to need a security encryption strategy,” he says.

Galvin says he’s seeing organizations looking to encrypt as much data as possible -- as long as it’s manageable. They want to “encrypt as much information as possible in the most simple way to manage it so they are protecting all” of their data, he says.

One of the biggest hurdles to encryption: first of all, getting on top of where sensitive data resides in today’s “borderless” network. Fifty-seven percent say that’s the biggest challenge for them, followed by the initial deployment of encryption (49%) and identifying which data to encrypt (35%).

Larry Ponemon, chairman and founder of The Ponemon Institute, says the wave of mega-breaches and attacks has pressured more organizations to up their game and encrypt more data. “The findings of this year’s study demonstrate the importance of both encryption and key management across a wide range of core enterprise applications – from networking, databases and application level encryption to PKI, payments, public and private cloud computing and more,” he says.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/29/2016 | 12:36:55 PM
biggest hurdles
Data classification and identification are huge hurdles when trying to implement an encryption methodology. It's a principle thats all too important but many times seems to fall by the wayside.
RyanSepe
50%
50%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
2/29/2016 | 12:33:07 PM
Encryption budgets dropping
"We want you to do more....but with less." Main point, you can't expect to incorporate a competent solution with heightened budgetary constraints.
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "I feel safe, but I can't understand a word he's saying."
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
Data breaches and regulations have forced organizations to pay closer attention to the security incident response function. However, security leaders may be overestimating their ability to detect and respond to security incidents. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-10374
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
A webserver component in Paessler PRTG Network Monitor 19.2.50 to PRTG 20.1.56 allows unauthenticated remote command execution via a crafted POST request or the what parameter of the screenshot function in the Contact Support form.
CVE-2020-11104
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
An issue was discovered in USC iLab cereal through 1.3.0. Serialization of an (initialized) C/C++ long double variable into a BinaryArchive or PortableBinaryArchive leaks several bytes of stack or heap memory, from which sensitive information (such as memory layout or private keys) can be gleaned if...
CVE-2020-11105
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
An issue was discovered in USC iLab cereal through 1.3.0. It employs caching of std::shared_ptr values, using the raw pointer address as a unique identifier. This becomes problematic if an std::shared_ptr variable goes out of scope and is freed, and a new std::shared_ptr is allocated at the same add...
CVE-2020-11106
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
An issue was discovered in Responsive Filemanager through 9.14.0. In the dialog.php page, the session variable $_SESSION['RF']["view_type"] wasn't sanitized if it was already set. This made stored XSS possible if one opens ajax_calls.php and uses the "view" action and places a pa...
CVE-2020-5284
PUBLISHED: 2020-03-30
Next.js versions before 9.3.2 have a directory traversal vulnerability. Attackers could craft special requests to access files in the dist directory (.next). This does not affect files outside of the dist directory (.next). In general, the dist directory only holds build assets unless your applicati...