Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

10/16/2019
10:55 AM
50%
50%

Cryptojacking Worm Targets and Infects 2,000 Docker Hosts

Basic and 'inept' worm managed to compromise Docker hosts by exploiting misconfigurations.

Some 2,000 Docker hosts have been attacked and infected by a relatively basic worm that exploits misconfigured permissions to download and run cryptojacking software as malicious containers.

Network security firm Palo Alto Networks in a report today said that despite its "inept" programming, the so-called Graboid worm has been successful: it searches for unsecured docker daemons, uses the access to the Docker host to install malicious images from the Docker Hub, and then runs scripts downloaded from a command-and-control (C2) server. Among the scripts are a cryptomining program that "mines" — or attempts to generate — the Monero cryptocurrency. Each miner is active about 63% of the time, according to Palo Alto.

The worm is not exploiting a vulnerability, but a lack of proper security settings, says Jen Miller-Osborn, deputy director of Palo Alto Networks' Unit 42 threat intelligence group.

"The issues is a lack of updating any of the initial security settings," she says. "The initial point of entry into the Docker host is there because none of the settings were changed. The front door is basically open on these systems."

Cryptomining and cryptojacking have become favored tactics of online attackers as a way of easily monetizing compromised systems, and continues to be used even as the price of cryptocurrencies have declined from their highs of December 2017 and January 2018. Cryptomining through malware and cryptojacking, where resources are used without the owner's authorization, are often used as way to generate a small amount of money from systems that would otherwise not be valuable to attackers. 

Initially, cryptojacking often involved running JavaScript inside the browsers of visitors to compromised sites. Using co-opted cloud resources is a technique that took off in 2018. One report found that cryptojacking of cloud resources affected a quarter of all companies in early 2018. While the Graboid worm is rudimentary, Palo Alto Networks warns that it could easily be updated through its connection with command-and-control servers.

"While this cryptojacking worm doesn't involve sophisticated tactics, techniques, or procedures, the worm can periodically pull new scripts from the C2s, so it can easily repurpose itself to ransomware or any malware to fully compromise the hosts down the line and shouldn’t be ignored," the company stated in the report.

The worm spreads by identifying vulnerable docker hosts and then sending a command to download a malicious docker image. The image is instantiated as a container, connects to the command-and-control (C2) server and download four scripts that downloads a list of IP addresses of more than 2,000 vulnerable hosts, determines the number of CPUs, and continues to spread. 

More than half of the vulnerable hosts are based in China, while about 14% are based in the United States and Ireland accounts for 4%, Palo Alto stated in its analysis.

Palo Alto conducted a simulation of the worm and, assuming that 70% of hosts are available at any given time, found out that it would take less than an hour to infect 1,400 vulnerable hosts. The cluster of 1,400 compromised hosts would give the group approximately 900 CPUs of processing power for cryptomining activities.

Locking Down Containers

Companies need to make sure that they lock down their container-based infrastructure, and know what parts of the infrastructure are their responsibility to secure, Miller-Osborn says. 

"With everyone wanting to shift into the cloud, there is a lack of understanding on both the consumer and the provider side of who's responsible for which part of the infrastructure," she says. "These containers that [the worm is] getting into are those that are left open to the entire Internet. It's not something that most people would do on purpose, but whenever they set that up, they fail to implement best practices to secure the images." 

The Docker team worked with Palo Alto Networks to remove the malicious images from the Docker Hub.

Palo Alto urged companies to lock down their containers and Docker hosts. Users should connect to the docker daemon with SSH, never use Docker images from unknown repositories or maintainers, and use firewall rules to limit the IP addresses that can access the Docker host.

"Never expose a docker daemon to the internet without a proper authentication mechanism," the company said in the report. "Note that by default the Docker Engine (CE) is NOT exposed to the internet."

Related Content:

 

This free, all-day online conference offers a look at the latest tools, strategies, and best practices for protecting your organization’s most sensitive data. Click for more information and, to register, here.

Veteran technology journalist of more than 20 years. Former research engineer. Written for more than two dozen publications, including CNET News.com, Dark Reading, MIT's Technology Review, Popular Science, and Wired News. Five awards for journalism, including Best Deadline ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-3154
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (Zend_Mail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.
CVE-2019-17190
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A Local Privilege Escalation issue was discovered in Avast Secure Browser 76.0.1659.101. The vulnerability is due to an insecure ACL set by the AvastBrowserUpdate.exe (which is running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) when AvastSecureBrowser.exe checks for new updates. When the update check is triggered, the...
CVE-2014-8161
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive column values by triggering constraint violation and then reading the error message.
CVE-2014-9481
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The Scribunto extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to obtain the rollback token and possibly other sensitive information via a crafted module, related to unstripping special page HTML.
CVE-2015-0241
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The to_char function in PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a (1) large number of digits when processing a numeric ...