Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

6/12/2019
02:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

CrowdStrike Prices IPO Above Range at $34

The endpoint security firm raised $612 million ahead of today's public debut.

CrowdStrike today marked its first day of public trading, opening at $63.50 after pricing its IPO at $34 per share and exceeding the expected range of $28 to $30 per share, analysts report.

The cloud-based endpoint security firm, operating on the Nasdaq under the symbol "CRWD," raised $612 million ahead of its debut with its initial public offering of 18 million Class A shares priced at $34 each. If it had stuck with the high end of its original range, CrowdStrike would have raised more than $600 million, according to its preliminary prospectus.

According to Bloomberg, shares rose as much as 97% from their initial price to hit $67, and stock was up 83% before noon – putting CrowdStrike at a valuation of about $12.2 billion.

The company was founded in 2011 by chief executive George Kurtz and chief technology officer Dmitri Alperovich, who wanted to address the inefficiencies of legacy security tools on the market. It most recently completed its Series E and has raised a total of $481 million in funding. CrowdStrike was valued at $3 billion in its last private funding round of $200 million last June.

When it was founded, relying on the cloud was risky, Kurtz notes. "Betting big on the cloud – widely considered risky at the time – allows us to ensure a rapid and seamless delivery of innovation and new features to always stay a step ahead of emerging threats," he said in a statement.

Revenue has been ramping up at CrowdStrike, which reported $249.8 million in revenue in the 2019 fiscal year ending January 31, with a net loss of $140.1 million. That's up from $118.8 million in reveneue and a net loss of $135.5 million during the same period a year prior. Customers include 44 of the Fortune 100 companies and nine of the top 20 major banks, CrowdStrike says.

Lead underwriters on CrowdStrike's offering include Goldman Sachs, J.P. Morgan, Bank of America Merrill Lynch, and Barclays.

Hank Thomas, CEO of Strategic Cyber Ventures, has been excited about CrowdStrike's IPO "since before they announced it," he says.

"CrowdStrike proved to me they were the best in the business years ago when they became the gold standard for incident response for mega breaches," he explains. Its threat intel, talent, and marketing have made them stand out, he added. There will only be a few major players emerging in cybersecurity, Thomas predicts; CrowdStrike will be one of them.

The offering is expected to close on Friday, subject to customary closing conditions.

But what's coming next for cybersecurity IPOs this year? Now that "the ice has been broken," as Thomas explains, he anticipates more. "The market and timing [are] right, and with rumors of a looming recession there [is] increased pressure to go public now." In addition to more IPOs, Thomas predict we'll continue to see cybersecurity acquisition news throughout 2019.

Related Content:

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
Cyberattacks Are Tailored to Employees ... Why Isn't Security Training?
Tim Sadler, CEO and co-founder of Tessian,  6/17/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
7 Powerful Cybersecurity Skills the Energy Sector Needs Most
Pam Baker, Contributing Writer,  6/22/2021
News
Microsoft Disrupts Large-Scale BEC Campaign Across Web Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/15/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-34390
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel function where a lack of checks allows the exploitation of an integer overflow on the size parameter of the tz_map_shared_mem function.
CVE-2021-34391
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel�s tz_handle_trusted_app_smc function where a lack of integer overflow checks on the req_off and param_ofs variables leads to memory corruption of critical kernel structures.
CVE-2021-34392
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty TLK contains a vulnerability in the NVIDIA TLK kernel where an integer overflow in the tz_map_shared_mem function can bypass boundary checks, which might lead to denial of service.
CVE-2021-34393
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in TSEC TA which deserializes the incoming messages even though the TSEC TA does not expose any command. This vulnerability might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution, causing information disclosure.
CVE-2021-34394
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-22
Trusty contains a vulnerability in all TAs whose deserializer does not reject messages with multiple occurrences of the same parameter. The deserialization of untrusted data might allow an attacker to exploit the deserializer to impact code execution.