Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

Container Security Is Falling Behind Container Deployments

Organizations are increasingly turning to containers even though they are not as confident in the security of those containers, according to a new survey.

Containers — virtualized applications that are key to DevOps — are maturing as critical parts of enterprise application infrastructures. And even though security strategies are maturing, organizations are still struggling to have security keep up with the other facets of container deployment.

A new report, sponsored by StackRox and based on research by AimPoint Group, shows that more than a third of companies haven't begun to implement a container security policy yet. While 15% say their company is in the planning stage with its container security strategy, 19% say that they haven't even gotten that far.

Part of the problem, says StackRox CEO Kamal Shah, is the complexity of the environment into which containers are being deployed. While many people look at containers as a technology for the cloud, Shah says, "We found that 70% are running containers on-prem and 53% are running in hybrid mode, which means running it on-premises as well as on one of the public cloud platforms."

Companies are turning to containers because the speed of deployment in containers is critical for organizations that are implementing agile or DevOps disciplines. And studies by other researchers show that some container practices, such as downloading and reusing popular pre-existing application images, don't insulate a company from security issues.

Jerry Gamblin, principal security engineer at Kenna Security, scanned the 1,000 most popular application images and found that over 60% of the top Docker files held a vulnerability with at least a moderate risk score, and over 20% of the files contained at least one vulnerability that would be considered high risk. [Note: A container is a virtualized application running on a system. An image is the file containing that application and its configuration files before it is launched.]

When looking at the source of vulnerabilities, the StackRox report says that poor deployment is the principal problem. According to the report, 60% of executives say that misconfigurations create the greatest security risks.

"The challenge in this new world is that there are a lot of options, a lot of controls that you have to configure, and there are a lot of configuration options," Shah says. "On top of that, what makes matters worse is that a lot of the controls that exist are not enabled by default."

Those controls are important because 43% of respondents say that runtime is the phase of the container life cycle that worries them the most. Though the report indicates that fixing issues is most cost-effective in building or deployment phases, the lack of a container security strategy hinders many companies in making those fixes.

Procedures and tools are available for better container security, if companies will employ them. Researchers at Alcide conducted surveys of best container practices and found that a handful of processes can make a huge difference in container security. Those best practices include familiar items like regular software updates and secure access, as well as container-specific practices, including namespace isolation (keeping containers completely separate from one another) and automated tools for scanning and setting container configurations.

Related Content:

 

Black Hat USA returns to Las Vegas with hands-on technical Trainings, cutting-edge Briefings, Arsenal open-source tool demonstrations, top-tier security solutions, and service providers in the Business Hall. Click for information on the conference and to register.

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
4 Security Tips as the July 15 Tax-Day Extension Draws Near
Shane Buckley, President & Chief Operating Officer, Gigamon,  7/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15105
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
CVE-2020-11061
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
CVE-2020-4042
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
CVE-2020-11081
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
CVE-2020-6114
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...