Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

11/17/2016
03:36 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cloud-driven IT Decentralization Increases Security Risk

IT management has become increasingly decentralized, which many businesses think is causing more harm than good - especially for security, a new study says.

IT management has become increasingly decentralized in the last three years, and businesses are struggling to address it. Many believe tech departments aren't ready to face this trend, which they believe will increase enterprise security risk.

These findings come from new cloud research on IT management, commissioned by VMWare and conducted by Vanson Bourne. Researchers expanded on a previous VMWare-sponsored study by The Economist Intelligence Unit, which focused on decentralization of enterprise tech.

As part of the Vanson Bourne study, researchers polled 3,300 people in August and September 2016. Respondents represented 20 industries and came from 20 countries across the Americas (24%), Asia-Pacific (39%), and EMEA (36%). 

Half of respondents were decision makers in their organization's IT department, said Chloe Byrne, project manager at Vanson Bourne. The other half are "business decision makers" from departments including business direction and strategy, engineering, finance, and operations.

The majority (69%) of respondents agree that IT management has continued to decentralize in the past three years, but most don't view this as a positive change. Nearly as many (65%) want IT to be more centralized. 

The decentralization trend is being driven by cloud computing, said Byrne. The cloud enables lines of business to purchase their own cloud IT more easily. Many are buying "IT as a service" to drive innovation.

This has both positive and negative effects on organizations. Respondents say decentralization is doing more harm than good, especially with respect to security.

Fifty-seven percent agree it has led to purchasing non-secure solutions, and 60% say it has resulted in apps being developed outside of corporate or government regulations. More than half (56%) say it has led to a lack of regulatory compliance for data protection. 

"[Decentralization] causes a lack of awareness of overall company-wide spend on IT, and even means that there will be duplication of cost where different departments could be purchasing the same thing," Byrne explained.

More than half (58%) of respondents claim decentralization has created a lack of clear ownership and responsibility for IT. Financially, it's causing an average increase of 5.7% on tech spending across organizations.

More than 60% of respondents claim decentralization is creating a duplication of IT spending across the organization, and 57% say it's driving a lack of awareness regarding how much money is spent on IT throughout the business.

"It can also make the IT department's job more challenging, increasing the stress on IT personnel and resources as they will still need to ensure security and compliance for their organization's data, not necessarily knowing where it is," said Byrne.

However, decentralization could also present new opportunities to the enterprise, she noted. It enables organizations to innovate more quickly, accelerate the development of new products and services, increase responsiveness to market changes, and drive employee satisfaction.

Related Content:

 

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
News
Inside the Ransomware Campaigns Targeting Exchange Servers
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  4/2/2021
Commentary
Beyond MITRE ATT&CK: The Case for a New Cyber Kill Chain
Rik Turner, Principal Analyst, Infrastructure Solutions, Omdia,  3/30/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-20001
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.2.0, BinaryHeap is not panic-safe. The binary heap is left in an inconsistent state when the comparison of generic elements inside sift_up or sift_down_range panics. This bug leads to a drop of zeroed memory as an arbitrary type, which can result in a memory ...
CVE-2020-36317
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, String::retain() function has a panic safety problem. It allows creation of a non-UTF-8 Rust string when the provided closure panics. This bug could result in a memory safety violation when other string APIs assume that UTF-8 encoding is used on the sam...
CVE-2020-36318
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.49.0, VecDeque::make_contiguous has a bug that pops the same element more than once under certain condition. This bug could result in a use-after-free or double free.
CVE-2021-28875
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.50.0, read_to_end() does not validate the return value from Read in an unsafe context. This bug could lead to a buffer overflow.
CVE-2021-28876
PUBLISHED: 2021-04-11
In the standard library in Rust before 1.52.0, the Zip implementation has a panic safety issue. It calls __iterator_get_unchecked() more than once for the same index when the underlying iterator panics (in certain conditions). This bug could lead to a memory safety violation due to an unmet safety r...