Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

11/17/2016
03:36 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Cloud-driven IT Decentralization Increases Security Risk

IT management has become increasingly decentralized, which many businesses think is causing more harm than good - especially for security, a new study says.

IT management has become increasingly decentralized in the last three years, and businesses are struggling to address it. Many believe tech departments aren't ready to face this trend, which they believe will increase enterprise security risk.

These findings come from new cloud research on IT management, commissioned by VMWare and conducted by Vanson Bourne. Researchers expanded on a previous VMWare-sponsored study by The Economist Intelligence Unit, which focused on decentralization of enterprise tech.

As part of the Vanson Bourne study, researchers polled 3,300 people in August and September 2016. Respondents represented 20 industries and came from 20 countries across the Americas (24%), Asia-Pacific (39%), and EMEA (36%). 

Half of respondents were decision makers in their organization's IT department, said Chloe Byrne, project manager at Vanson Bourne. The other half are "business decision makers" from departments including business direction and strategy, engineering, finance, and operations.

The majority (69%) of respondents agree that IT management has continued to decentralize in the past three years, but most don't view this as a positive change. Nearly as many (65%) want IT to be more centralized. 

The decentralization trend is being driven by cloud computing, said Byrne. The cloud enables lines of business to purchase their own cloud IT more easily. Many are buying "IT as a service" to drive innovation.

This has both positive and negative effects on organizations. Respondents say decentralization is doing more harm than good, especially with respect to security.

Fifty-seven percent agree it has led to purchasing non-secure solutions, and 60% say it has resulted in apps being developed outside of corporate or government regulations. More than half (56%) say it has led to a lack of regulatory compliance for data protection. 

"[Decentralization] causes a lack of awareness of overall company-wide spend on IT, and even means that there will be duplication of cost where different departments could be purchasing the same thing," Byrne explained.

More than half (58%) of respondents claim decentralization has created a lack of clear ownership and responsibility for IT. Financially, it's causing an average increase of 5.7% on tech spending across organizations.

More than 60% of respondents claim decentralization is creating a duplication of IT spending across the organization, and 57% say it's driving a lack of awareness regarding how much money is spent on IT throughout the business.

"It can also make the IT department's job more challenging, increasing the stress on IT personnel and resources as they will still need to ensure security and compliance for their organization's data, not necessarily knowing where it is," said Byrne.

However, decentralization could also present new opportunities to the enterprise, she noted. It enables organizations to innovate more quickly, accelerate the development of new products and services, increase responsiveness to market changes, and drive employee satisfaction.

Related Content:

 

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Major Brazilian Bank Tests Homomorphic Encryption on Financial Data
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/10/2020
Exploits Released for As-Yet Unpatched Critical Citrix Flaw
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  1/13/2020
Microsoft Patches Windows Vuln Discovered by the NSA
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/14/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Post a Comment
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
[Just Released] How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-3683
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
The keystone-json-assignment package in SUSE Openstack Cloud 8 before commit d7888c75505465490250c00cc0ef4bb1af662f9f every user listed in the /etc/keystone/user-project-map.json was assigned full "member" role access to every project. This allowed these users to access, modify, create and...
CVE-2019-3682
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
The docker-kubic package in SUSE CaaS Platform 3.0 before 17.09.1_ce-7.6.1 provided access to an insecure API locally on the Kubernetes master node.
CVE-2019-17361
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In SaltStack Salt through 2019.2.0, the salt-api NEST API with the ssh client enabled is vulnerable to command injection. This allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the API endpoint to execute arbitrary code on the salt-api host.
CVE-2019-19142
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
Intelbras WRN240 devices do not require authentication to replace the firmware via a POST request to the incoming/Firmware.cfg URI.
CVE-2019-19801
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-17
In Gallagher Command Centre Server versions of v8.10 prior to v8.10.1134(MR4), v8.00 prior to v8.00.1161(MR5), v7.90 prior to v7.90.991(MR5), v7.80 prior to v7.80.960(MR2) and v7.70 or earlier, an unprivileged but authenticated user is able to perform a backup of the Command Centre databases.