Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

3/27/2018
12:35 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Bad Bots Increasingly Hide Out in Cloud Data Centers

Humans accounted for nearly 58% of website traffic in 2017 -- the rest were bad and good bots.

Bots became a household term last year in the wake of Russian election-meddling in the US and their inordinate presence on social media platforms. The population of these malicious bots also grew by nearly 10% last year, accounting for one-fifth of all website traffic.

So-called bad bots also execute online fraud, data theft, and distributed denial-of-service attacks, and despite more awareness as well as moves by Twitter and others to purge them, they continue to dog e-commerce and evolve their tactics to evade detection, according to a new analysis of bot activity by Distil Networks that studied hundreds of billions of bad bot requests on thousands of websites.

Humans accounted for nearly 58% of website traffic in 2017, with the rest bad bots (21.46%) and good bots (20.74%). Good bots include tools like search engine crawlers, while bad bots are everything from trolls to illicit data-scraping tools and proxies for cybercrime. Most bad bots live on gambling (53.1%) and airline (43.9%) websites, and most (83.2%) pose as Web browser-users, including Chrome, Firefox, Internet Explorer, and Safari, and 10.4% as mobile browsers (Safari, Android, and Opera).

The biggest shift in 2017 was bots hiding out in data centers: some 82.7% are now operating out of cloud-based accounts versus 60.1% in 2016, the data shows.

Anna Westelius, senior director of security research at Distil, says bad bots are waging credential-stuffing attacks en masse. While account takeover attacks on average occur two to three times per month, after a data breach occurs, account takeover attacks increase threefold, according to Distil's data.

"They are trying them wherever they can," Westelius says of the stolen credentials.

They're also mimicking human behavior more convincingly, by executing JavaScript like a browser, or faking mouse movements. "A lot of the time, bad bots are utilizing human connections, like human smartphone connections," Westelius says. "A lot of these are malware-related botnets" that want to appear as human as possible in their communications and behaviors, she says.

Distil found that 5.8% of all mobile devices on cellular networks are used in bad bot attacks. These bots are considered the most advanced or sophisticated because they are less likely to get detected. Overall, 74% of bad bot traffic today is sophisticated or moderately sophisticated, the report says.

But operating out of cloud data centers is all the rage for bot runners now. It's inexpensive to spin up a cloud server, for example, and it appears legit. "Hosting provides really offer them a legal way to highly distribute themselves. It's cheap and accessible," Westelius says.

The move to the cloud coincided with a decrease in residential bot traffic, according to Distil. "The economics and success of using low-cost cloud data centers probably explains why there was a drop in the amount of traffic from residential ISPs, falling from 30.5% to 14.8% in 2017," the report said.

Related Content:

 Interop ITX 2018

Join Dark Reading LIVE for an intensive Security Pro Summit at Interop ITX and learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the agenda here.Register with Promo Code DR200 and save $200.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/4/2020
Data Loss Spikes Under COVID-19 Lockdowns
Seth Rosenblatt, Contributing Writer,  5/28/2020
Abandoned Apps May Pose Security Risk to Mobile Devices
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13817
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
ntpd in ntp before 4.2.8p14 and 4.3.x before 4.3.100 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon exit or system time change) by predicting transmit timestamps for use in spoofed packets. The victim must be relying on unauthenticated IPv4 time sources. There must be an off-path attac...
CVE-2020-13818
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
In Zoho ManageEngine OpManager before 125144, when <cachestart> is used, directory traversal validation can be bypassed.
CVE-2020-6640
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An improper neutralization of input vulnerability in the Admin Profile of FortiAnalyzer may allow a remote authenticated attacker to perform a stored cross site scripting attack (XSS) via the Description Area.
CVE-2020-9292
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
An unquoted service path vulnerability in the FortiSIEM Windows Agent component may allow an attacker to gain elevated privileges via the AoWinAgt executable service path.
CVE-2019-16150
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-04
Use of a hard-coded cryptographic key to encrypt security sensitive data in local storage and configuration in FortiClient for Windows prior to 6.4.0 may allow an attacker with access to the local storage or the configuration backup file to decrypt the sensitive data via knowledge of the hard-coded ...