Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

9/28/2020
10:15 AM
Kelly Sheridan
Kelly Sheridan
Slideshows
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail

9 Tips to Prepare for the Future of Cloud & Network Security

Cloud and network security analysts outline trends and priorities businesses should keep top of mind as they grow more reliant on cloud.
2 of 10

The Risk of SaaS Defaults

As Riley pointed out, most cloud security questions fall into one of three main categories: cloud risk management, infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) security, and software-as-a-service (SaaS) control. IaaS usually falls under the control of developers, who can choose from a small number of providers. Lines of business typically control SaaS and can choose from many more providers.

"Unfortunately, many IT professionals would prefer to ignore the burgeoning SaaS market, even though in most cases it represents a more significant area of computing than do IaaS in private clouds," he said. The sheer size of the SaaS market should be of concern to security teams, who often lack control over which software is downloaded and how it's used.

All services can externally share objects, but the default configuration is to not share. Open buckets, a common security risk, is a customer mistake. SaaS applications are different.

A "surprising number" of SaaS applications not only allow external shares but open them by default, Riley pointed out. There are arguments over whether this is a design flaw or weakness on the part of the user. Default configuration can be modified, he added, but the organization must have the will to do so.

"There's no point in arguing about what the provider's initial default should be," he continued. Your organization will obtain cloud services that may put them at risk, and security teams must be aware of this and do something about it. Closing open file shares is the most effective first step in cloud security a business can take, Riley said.

(Image: Guy Sagi -- stock.adobe.com)

2 of 10
Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Nahla D.
50%
50%
Nahla D.,
User Rank: Author
9/30/2020 | 9:21:54 AM
Great article!
Very informative article!!! Great job!
dave_cole
50%
50%
dave_cole,
User Rank: Author
9/29/2020 | 12:03:15 PM
Well done
Appreciate the breadth of topics, coverage.
JohnHammond
100%
0%
JohnHammond,
User Rank: Author
9/28/2020 | 5:24:15 PM
Great!
Nice article!
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 10/23/2020
Modern Day Insider Threat: Network Bugs That Are Stealing Your Data
David Pearson, Principal Threat Researcher,  10/21/2020
Are You One COVID-19 Test Away From a Cybersecurity Disaster?
Alan Brill, Senior Managing Director, Cyber Risk Practice, Kroll,  10/21/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2018-21269
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-27
checkpath in OpenRC through 0.42.1 might allow local users to take ownership of arbitrary files because a non-terminal path component can be a symlink.
CVE-2020-27743
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
libtac in pam_tacplus through 1.5.1 lacks a check for a failure of RAND_bytes()/RAND_pseudo_bytes(). This could lead to use of a non-random/predictable session_id.
CVE-2020-1915
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
An out-of-bounds read in the JavaScript Interpreter in Facebook Hermes prior to commit 8cb935cd3b2321c46aa6b7ed8454d95c75a7fca0 allows attackers to cause a denial of service attack or possible further memory corruption via crafted JavaScript. Note that this is only exploitable if the application usi...
CVE-2020-26878
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus through 1.5.1.0.21 is affected by remote command injection. An authenticated user can submit a query to the API (/service/v1/createUser endpoint), injecting arbitrary commands that will be executed as root user via web.py.
CVE-2020-26879
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-26
Ruckus vRioT through 1.5.1.0.21 has an API backdoor that is hardcoded into validate_token.py. An unauthenticated attacker can interact with the service API by using a backdoor value as the Authorization header.