Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

4/3/2018
06:00 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

7 Deadly Security Sins of Web Applications

The top ways organizations open themselves up to damaging Web app attacks.
Previous
1 of 8
Next

Web application attacks are on the rise, according to recent figures from Akamai, which logged a 10% increase in attacks from Q4 of 2016 to the same time period in 2017.

"The vast majority of web application attacks are the result of untargeted scans looking for any vulnerable system, but a few are directed attempts to compromise a specific target," writes Martin McKeay, senior security advocate for the firm, within its most recent State of the Internet Security report. "In either case, they are so frequent and so 'noisy' — in other words, difficult to accurately detect — that many organizations are struggling to simply keep their web application firewalls running effectively, and do not have the spare cycles to worry about what their systems might be missing."

The bottom line is that organizations need to improve their secure coding practices to reduce their risk in their arena. This list highlights some of the biggest risks organizations open themselves up to when it comes to their Web apps. 

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Previous
1 of 8
Next
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
SchemaCzar
50%
50%
SchemaCzar,
User Rank: Strategist
4/4/2018 | 12:32:14 PM
SQL Injection - Worst aspect of today's refusal to use database best practices
Since I began in software development thirty years ago, I have seen a progressive refusal to effectively employ relational database technology in the mainstream of software development.  The primary manifestation of this is the refusal to apply normalization, instead applying the self-defeating antipattern of object-relational mappers and other persistence frameworks.

However the worst side of this is the terrible security holes in web database applications via SQL Injection.  This is something that does not lie with the database at all, even in the porous case of MySQL.  SQL Injection vulnerabilities are directly and exclusively the result of lazy application programming.  All of the countermeasures under development to mitigate SQL Injection such as database "firewalls" and virtual private databases are add-ons not needed with secure database application development.

SQL injection is an Application Coder's problem | The Schema Czar

 
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-11844
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
CVE-2020-6937
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
CVE-2020-7648
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
CVE-2020-7650
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
CVE-2020-7654
PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.