Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud

2/2/2018
10:30 AM
Paul Martini
Paul Martini
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail vvv
50%
50%

3 Ways Hackers Steal Your Company's Mobile Data

The most effective data exfiltration prevention strategies are those that are as rigorous in vetting traffic entering the network as they are traffic leaving it.

It's the unfortunate reality of the cybersecurity threat landscape today that malicious actors are advancing their tactics at a breakneck pace, finding new vulnerabilities in network defenses to execute attacks faster than IT teams can keep up.

This is especially true in the context of the modern distributed organization, where employees leverage an array of mobile devices — and access private networks from almost any location outside of headquarters — to conduct their work. This is a boon for business in that workers can enjoy flexible hours and not be tied to their desks to complete tasks, which can boost employee satisfaction and performance. But it also puts an increased burden on IT teams and network administrators, as they now are tasked with managing a practically borderless network with higher traffic volumes than ever before.

In fact, according to a recent survey of IT teams at major US organizations conducted by Researchscape for iboss, 80% of IT executives weren't confident in their ability to secure mobile traffic in the future, while only 56% of their superiors in the C-suite accepted the same reality.

This is compounded by the increased adoption of cloud services such as Office 365, Dropbox, and other off-premises storage providers, making it harder than ever for corporations to monitor the data leaving their network. Criminals are increasingly able to hide within encrypted traffic, exit the network, and slowly siphon out sensitive data without IT administrators immediately noticing.

While understanding the flaws in network defenses is valuable in planning for the future, it's also critical to know when and how sensitive data leaves the network, especially in expanding, high-stakes mobile breach scenarios. Here are three ways that cybercriminals can gain access to corporate systems through mobile devices and exfiltrate data.

Tor: Free Data Encryption
First developed in 2002 as "The Onion Router," the Tor project directs traffic through a free volunteer overlay network that employs more than 7,000 relays to conceal information about users from network monitoring teams. Tor can be implemented in the application layer of a communication protocol stack that's nested like an onion — hence the original name — encrypting data, including the next destination IP address, repeatedly, before it goes through a virtual circuit comprising successive, randomly selected Tor relays.

Because the routing of communication is partially hidden at every port in the Tor circuit, traffic source and destination are hidden from the view of network administrators at every stop. This makes it increasingly difficult for IT and security professionals to determine whether traffic is legitimately exiting the network or if the activity indicates data exfiltration.

Hiding Within Legitimate Traffic
Sensitive data may also be hidden within files or documents that wouldn't normally be tagged as malicious content by traditional network security monitors. A hacker who may already have crossed the perimeter might hide sensitive data within Word documents or .zip files, for instance, that feature familiar naming protocols and size characteristics.

If security protocols at the gateway aren't taking a detailed approach to vetting content as it exits the network — that is, taking a layered approach to evaluating entire files that goes beyond adhering to proxy settings or standard decryption — hackers can funnel data out of the network for weeks, months, or years before administrators even notice.

Leveraging Cloud Storage Applications
The problem with many cloud applications is that they usually require users to send content into a data center shared by multiple customers, where many users and corporations leverage the same storage capacity and bandwidth. Cloud providers are also a third-party service, which means that data is potentially at risk of being mishandled by the provider if they aren't a proven, trusted partner, or if their security protocols aren't up to snuff.

File encryption and strong passwords can go a long way toward protecting corporate data housed in the cloud. But the most effective way to prevent data exfiltration is a defense-in-depth strategy that is as vigorous in vetting traffic entering the network as it does leaving it, by looking at data packets individually to determine the true intent of the content. For example, this could include sandboxing features that allow documents to play out in a simulated network environment that tests for malicious inclinations once the document crosses the network perimeter. Putting data about to leave the network through the same proxies and firewalls as incoming traffic is another possible solution.

This approach is especially critical for mobile devices accessing network data via remote channels and public Wi-Fi. With the increasing mobility of employees who frequently and easily access cloud services from coffee shops and airports, companies need to make sure that all their active user and device directories remain up-to-date, and that the network is constantly monitored to ensure all users are following best practices. This requires taking regular inventory of the devices and users accessing the network — quarterly, monthly, or even weekly — to ensure that unverified traffic is easy to spot on a rolling basis. The more rigorous that security teams are in making sure their reference points are up-to-date, the more effective their use of leading cybersecurity tools will be in preventing data exfiltration.

Related Content:

Paul Martini is the CEO, co-founder and chief architect of iboss, where he pioneered the award-winning iboss Distributed Gateway Platform, a web gateway as a service. Paul has been recognized for his leadership and innovation, receiving the Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of The ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/9/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Mobile App Fraud Jumped in Q1 as Attackers Pivot from Browsers
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/10/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15105
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Django Two-Factor Authentication before 1.12, stores the user's password in clear text in the user session (base64-encoded). The password is stored in the session when the user submits their username and password, and is removed once they complete authentication by entering a two-factor authenticati...
CVE-2020-11061
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
In Bareos Director less than or equal to 16.2.10, 17.2.9, 18.2.8, and 19.2.7, a heap overflow allows a malicious client to corrupt the director's memory via oversized digest strings sent during initialization of a verify job. Disabling verify jobs mitigates the problem. This issue is also patched in...
CVE-2020-4042
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
Bareos before version 19.2.8 and earlier allows a malicious client to communicate with the director without knowledge of the shared secret if the director allows client initiated connection and connects to the client itself. The malicious client can replay the Bareos director's cram-md5 challenge to...
CVE-2020-11081
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
osquery before version 4.4.0 enables a priviledge escalation vulnerability. If a Window system is configured with a PATH that contains a user-writable directory then a local user may write a zlib1.dll DLL, which osquery will attempt to load. Since osquery runs with elevated privileges this enables l...
CVE-2020-6114
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-10
An exploitable SQL injection vulnerability exists in the Admin Reports functionality of Glacies IceHRM v26.6.0.OS (Commit bb274de1751ffb9d09482fd2538f9950a94c510a) . A specially crafted HTTP request can cause SQL injection. An attacker can make an authenticated HTTP request to trigger this vulnerabi...