theDocumentId => 752580 Survey Finds Enterprise Concerned About Mass Data ...

Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud Security

7/5/2019
10:30 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Survey Finds Enterprise Concerned About Mass Data Fragmentation

For many organizations, the public cloud has failed to live up to expectations.

Cohesity, of the UK, commissioned independent market research company Vanson Bourne to conduct a quantitative research studyinto mass data fragmentation, the impact it is having on organizations and the benefits which can be achieved by solving it. The research was carried out in early 2019. Nine hundred senior IT decision makers were interviewed, from the US (250), the UK (250), France (100), Germany (100), Australia (100) and Japan (100). Respondents were from organizations with 1,000 employees or more, from a variety of private or public sectors with a focus on financial services, healthcare, life sciences, media and entertainment, technology and the public sector.

Well, we can see the survey was broad enough to get almost all major enterprise groups included. So, what did they think?

Ninety-one percent of respondents said that they believed the cloud would simplify operations, increase agility, reduce costs and provide greater insights, but many of those hopes haven't come to fruition. About a third (32%) of respondents' organizations have achieved all of the public cloud benefits they expected they would, which leaves the remaining two thirds only achieving some (58%) or a few (10%) of the expected benefits.

The same percentage of those disappointed (91%) specify mass data fragmentation as the cause. But 98% expect that their organization's public cloud-based storage will increase by 93% on average between 2018 and the end of 2019. It seems cloud use will be going forward even if there are current disappointments.

Mass data fragmentation means a proliferation of data that is spread across myriad different locations, infrastructure silos and management systems that prevents organizations from fully utilizing its value. It includes but is not exclusive to public cloud environments.

About half (44%) of the respondents use three to four point products to manage their data (backups, archives, files, test/dev copies) across public clouds today, while nearly one fifth (17%) are using as many as five to six separate solutions. Respondents expressed their concerns in the report about using multiple products to move data between on-premises and public cloud environments if those products don't integrate. Fifty-eight percent are concerned about security, 46% worry about costs, and 42% are concerned about compliance. There may also be a functional disconnect between senior management and IT. Eighty-eight percent of respondents say that their IT teams have been given a mandate to move to the public cloud by senior management. However, nearly half of those respondents (41%) say they are struggling to come up with a strategy that effectively uses the public cloud to the complete benefit of the organization.

"Given the amount of data organizations accumulate on a daily basis, it's almost inevitable that without proper management, organizations were going to lose control of their data," said Katie Noyce, research manager of Vanson Bourne. "This problem is now impacting organizations' ability to make the best use of the public cloud. Over nine in ten (91%) of those who feel the promise of this service hasn't been realized attribute this failure to the fact that their data is greatly fragmented. It seems like a no-brainer that organizations need to get a hold on their data, before it gets a hold on them."

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-37578
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-29
Apache jUDDI uses several classes related to Java's Remote Method Invocation (RMI) which (as an extension to UDDI) provides an alternate transport for accessing UDDI services. RMI uses the default Java serialization mechanism to pass parameters in RMI invocations. A remote attacker can send a malic...
CVE-2021-23416
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
This affects all versions of package curly-bracket-parser. When used as a template library, it does not properly sanitize the user input.
CVE-2021-23417
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
All versions of package deepmergefn are vulnerable to Prototype Pollution via deepMerge function.
CVE-2021-23415
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
This affects the package elFinder.AspNet before 1.1.1. The user-controlled file name is not properly sanitized before it is used to create a file system path.
CVE-2020-4974
PUBLISHED: 2021-07-28
IBM Jazz Foundation products are vulnerable to server side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. IBM X-Force ID: 192434.