Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud Security

// // //

Survey Finds Companies Don't Know Cloud Security

Companies are worried about security in the public cloud, but a new survey shows they don't understand the basics.

A new survey shows that companies are rapidly increasing their use of public cloud applications and services, but that concerns about security are holding back even faster growth. Among the issues is confusion about just which players in the overall security picture are responsible for various aspects of cloud protection.

The research, conducted by Vanson Bourne and sponsored by Barracuda, interviewed 300 "decision makers" from organizations of various sizes, all of which are currently using infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS). Researchers found that Microsoft Azure, Amazon Web Services and Google Cloud Platform are the leading public cloud providers with 68% of respondents using more than one provider because they feel that each platform has unique strengths.

For more than half (52%) of those responding to the survey, using different cloud providers also has security benefits, an important consideration when 74% said that concerns about security restrict the degree to which their organization is moving to the cloud.

Once an organization has made the move to a cloud infrastructure, moving additional applications and services to the cloud becomes easier. After the initial move, organizations reported that their cloud use doubled within the first five years. The reason for the increased cloud use varied, though the companies responding to the survey were almost unanimous in saying that they received multiple benefits from their cloud migration.

Lower cost (58%) and greater scalability (56%) were the primary benefits seen from a cloud move with an average ROI of 29% from the move. The benefits are crucial, especially given that key elements of cloud security seem poorly understood.

The Shared Security Model is the basis of most cloud security plans. Simply put, it states that the cloud provider is responsible for the infrastructure's security while the customer is responsible for securing the data they place within the security. Different cloud providers use slightly different language, but the basic understanding is consistent across the industry.


You're invited to attend Light Reading's Virtualizing the Cable Architecture event – a free breakfast panel at SCTE/ISBE's Cable-Tec Expo on October 18 featuring Comcast's Rob Howald and Charter's John Dickinson.

In this survey, though, more than 75% of those responding said that cloud providers are responsible for securing data on the cloud while 66% see cloud-based applications as part of the cloud providers' responsibility. While this is going on, more than 90% said that they are worried about using a public cloud -- creating a situation in which the vast majority of cloud users are concerned about security problems that they feel are, essentially, out of their hands.

It seems that the key takeaway from the research is that organizations using the public cloud should quickly gain a thorough understanding of the shared responsibility model of security. Knowing who is responsible for which pieces of security means that the proper party can take action to control access and secure information.

Related posts:

— Curtis Franklin is the editor of SecurityNow.com. Follow him on Twitter @kg4gwa.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Black Hat USA 2022 Attendee Report
Black Hat attendees are not sleeping well. Between concerns about attacks against cloud services, ransomware, and the growing risks to the global supply chain, these security pros have a lot to be worried about. Read our 2022 report to hear what they're concerned about now.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2022-35942
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
Improper input validation on the `contains` LoopBack filter may allow for arbitrary SQL injection. When the extended filter property `contains` is permitted to be interpreted by the Postgres connector, it is possible to inject arbitrary SQL which may affect the confidentiality and integrity of data ...
CVE-2022-35949
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
undici is an HTTP/1.1 client, written from scratch for Node.js.`undici` is vulnerable to SSRF (Server-side Request Forgery) when an application takes in **user input** into the `path/pathname` option of `undici.request`. If a user specifies a URL such as `http://127.0.0.1` or `//127.0.0.1` ```js con...
CVE-2022-35953
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
BookWyrm is a social network for tracking your reading, talking about books, writing reviews, and discovering what to read next. Some links in BookWyrm may be vulnerable to tabnabbing, a form of phishing that gives attackers an opportunity to redirect a user to a malicious site. The issue was patche...
CVE-2022-35956
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
This Rails gem adds two methods to the ActiveRecord::Base class that allow you to update many records on a single database hit, using a case sql statement for it. Before version 0.1.3 `update_by_case` gem used custom sql strings, and it was not sanitized, making it vulnerable to sql injection. Upgra...
CVE-2022-35943
PUBLISHED: 2022-08-12
Shield is an authentication and authorization framework for CodeIgniter 4. This vulnerability may allow [SameSite Attackers](https://canitakeyoursubdomain.name/) to bypass the [CodeIgniter4 CSRF protection](https://codeigniter4.github.io/userguide/libraries/security.html) mechanism with CodeIgniter ...