Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud Security

8/16/2018
08:05 AM
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli
Joe Stanganelli
50%
50%

IAM Heads to the Mobile Cloud

Persisting problems with identity and access management combined with usability demands are influencing the IAM market. But will enterprise IT step up its IAM game?

Johan Lidros, the president of the Eminere Group, gave a recent presentation concerning how inappropriate access and shared accounts top the very long list of common findings of identity and access management (IAM) audits.

Lidros further pointed out that in a recent survey of healthcare enterprises, two out of nine respondents did not even know how many of their systems had been audited for access review. Of the remaining respondents who did know the answer, nearly two thirds of them told their surveyors that fewer than half of their systems had been subject to such reviews.

Little surprise, then, that Gartner has predicted that more than 50% of all infrastructure-as-a-service (IaaS) security compromises will stem from IAM failures. Accordingly, the IAM market is expected to grow substantially over the next eight years. Of that growth, the ever-increasing ubiquity of so-called "smart" devices -- often designed without security in mind in the beginning stages -- will lead to the Internet of Things (IoT) alone comprising one fifth of all new IAM investment by 2020.

At this point, there is really little excuse for enterprises to not be well invested in a tight IAM game -- and the big three of cloud-services providers are banking on this.

Microsoft Azure offers close-knit integration of IAM tools with its platform, while AWS has long offered configurable IAM services. And even Google Cloud Platform offers free and paid IAM options -- albeit reportedly less turnkey than those of its major competitors. (See Cloud-Based Identity Management Systems: What to Look For.)

Moreover, Google announced at its Google Next conference that it is ramping up its IAM offerings across GCP.

Additionally, AWS announced this month the offering of a new IAM feature on its cloud platform -- configuration of permissions boundaries to delegate permissions management and allow employees to grant and manage their own permissions within whatever power deemed appropriate by an administrator.

Indeed, this type of delegation is fast becoming the trend in IAM systems -- usability and accessibility by the hoi polloi. In a recent report on the subject, Forrester predicts that so-called cloud-based "Identity as a Service" (IDaaS) will, sometime between 2019 and 2021, evolve into "a viable alternative for all IAM services" while adding enhanced fourth-factor authentication (i.e., "something you do") analytics into the mix. These new solutions look for and compare suspicious and otherwise nonstandard behaviors to known "trusted" behaviors.

At the same time, as with most big data solutions ultimately, Forrester argues that, as IAM is an "essential" aspect of ensuring customers' information security and data privacy, top IAM solutions will perforce be compelled to have "consumer-like interfaces for employees."

Most intrinsically, this means that IAM solutions must be easy and intuitive to use -- not to mention jargon-free. Report authors Andras Cser and Merritt Maxim go further than these basics, however, by building in IAM security in mobile solutions from the beginning. Enterprise IT is thereby encouraged to integrate IAM "seamlessly into the mobile experience" from the ground up, so as to maintain accessibility, scalability, and agility while enhancing confidence in the quality of the data stewardship, into each "mobile moment" -- including application registration, user login/authentication, login-credential recovery and "high-value transactions."

Absent these steps in IAM implementation, suggest Cser and Maxim, bad security UX will cause employees (especially younger employees who are used to slicker and more seamless interfaces) to silently revolt -- doing whatever they can to work around bad security implementations that are viewed outside of the IT department as little more than anti-productivity fascism. Moreover, the failure to design and integrate IAM solutions with security, privacy, and compliance in mind from the beginning (or, at least, the failure to verify that this was done and is so being maintained) will similarly compromise information and network security -- which is rather the whole point of IAM.

"This is an area where in-house solutions struggle most," Cser and Maxim write, "as often these solutions were initially implemented in the shortest possible time, with minimal resources to meet simple requirements, and then grew significantly without truly being transformed to protect data and help with compliance."

The big takeaway, therefore, is that IAM implementation should not be rushed. And, yet, its complexities make it tempting to outsource. Appropriately, major cloud-service providers have themselves hustled to supply IAM integration. Still, cloud providers often cannot answer the important questions themselves when it comes to security strategy. (See CFOs: Cybersecurity Is About Risk, Not Vendors.)

If enterprises continue to fail to properly assess and audit IAM, IAM-solutions vendors will continue to profit off of the failures of their customers.

Related posts:

— Joe Stanganelli, principal of Beacon Hill Law, is a Boston-based attorney, corporate-communications and data-privacy consultant, writer, and speaker. Follow him on Twitter at @JoeStanganelli.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 8/3/2020
'BootHole' Vulnerability Exposes Secure Boot Devices to Attack
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  7/29/2020
Average Cost of a Data Breach: $3.86 Million
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/29/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2017-18112
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-05
Affected versions of Atlassian Fisheye allow remote attackers to view the HTTP password of a repository via an Information Disclosure vulnerability in the logging feature. The affected versions are before version 4.8.3.
CVE-2020-15109
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
In solidus before versions 2.8.6, 2.9.6, and 2.10.2, there is an bility to change order address without triggering address validations. This vulnerability allows a malicious customer to craft request data with parameters that allow changing the address of the current order without changing the shipm...
CVE-2020-16847
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
Extreme Analytics in Extreme Management Center before 8.5.0.169 allows unauthenticated reflected XSS via a parameter in a GET request, aka CFD-4887.
CVE-2020-15135
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
save-server (npm package) before version 1.05 is affected by a CSRF vulnerability, as there is no CSRF mitigation (Tokens etc.). The fix introduced in version version 1.05 unintentionally breaks uploading so version v1.0.7 is the fixed version. This is patched by implementing Double submit. The CSRF...
CVE-2020-13522
PUBLISHED: 2020-08-04
An exploitable arbitrary file delete vulnerability exists in SoftPerfect RAM Disk 4.1 spvve.sys driver. A specially crafted I/O request packet (IRP) can allow an unprivileged user to delete any file on the filesystem. An attacker can send a malicious IRP to trigger this vulnerability.