Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud Security //

AWS

4/6/2018
09:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Don't Call AWS' CloudFront Hijacking Problem a Vulnerability

Amazon Web Service might be the biggest of the big cloud providers, but it still has some security concerns. A researcher has noticed the company is open to having its CloudFront service hijacked, but Amazon officials won't call it a vulnerability.

Amazon Web Services is trying rather hard to get its security game going to the next level. But security researchers keep finding new ways to mess with it.

The newest one is from MindPoint Group, and involves the AWS CloudFront CDN service. Security analyst Matt Westfall found out that in a misconfigured CloudFront account, subdomains of legitimate sites could be hijacked.

This is, at root, a flaw in CloudFront.

While each CloudFront distribution will have a unique endpoint for users to point their DNS records to, all of the domains using a specific distribution must be listed in the "Alternate Domain Names" (CNAMEs) field in the options for that distribution.

However, when the CDN gets a request, it uses the HOST header of the request to determine which distribution to use. In this scenario, if the HOST header does not match an entry in the "Alternate Domain Names" (CNAMEs) field of the intended distribution, the request will fail.

Any other distribution that contains the specific domain in the HOST header will receive the request and respond to it normally. This is the mechanism that enables the hijack to occur.

The binding mechanism that should be in place inside CloudFront is then easily bypassed. A request to one specific CloudFront subdomain will not be limited to only that associated distribution list.

In his blog, Westfall wrote about how he tested out his observation.

What Westfall ended up doing is creating a Python script that would test for misconfiguration and repoint vulnerable subdomains to the target of his choice.

In his test, he ran the script for a few days and found that he had hijacked a lot of high-profile subdomains. They included two distinct US Federal "dot gov" organizations, Bloomberg Businessweek, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Dow Jones, Harvard University, Red Cross and Reuters.

The problem seemed to be widespread.

The AWS response was interesting.

Westfall discussed what he found out with the AWS Security team and the CloudFront engineers. As he put it, "...while they accept that the nuances of CloudFront's routing mechanism leave room for improvement, at no time have they decided to treat this issue as a vulnerability."


The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

Huh.

Westfall recommends that "most AWS customers with a single distribution can protect themselves by adding a wildcard domain (such as *.disloops.com) to the "Alternate Domain Names" (CNAMEs) field.

Amazon isn't totally ignoring this, either.

The CloudFront console now displays a popup when a user removes a CNAME from a CloudFront distribution that warns them to keep their DNS records in sync with their CloudFront distribution. Such a synchronization would prevent the possibility of hijacking.

Amazon has been getting more security conscious lately.

At the AWS Summit this week, the cloud provider introduced new automation tools for making secure apps easier to run in AWS. (See AWS Expands Cloud Security Automation.)

Although the company doesn't consider the CloudFront situation a vulnerability, its engineers are trying to help users avoid the situation where it could happen. They seem to have realized that just the selling of runtime on someone else's computer may not be the entire business model that is needed for success.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 11/19/2020
New Proposed DNS Security Features Released
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  11/19/2020
How to Identify Cobalt Strike on Your Network
Zohar Buber, Security Analyst,  11/18/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: He hits the gong anytime he sees someone click on an email link.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-29071
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
An XSS issue was found in the Shares feature of LiquidFiles before 3.3.19. The issue arises from the insecure rendering of HTML files uploaded to the platform as attachments, when the -htmlview URL is directly accessed. The impact ranges from executing commands as root on the server to retrieving se...
CVE-2020-29072
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
A Cross-Site Script Inclusion vulnerability was found on LiquidFiles before 3.3.19. This client-side attack requires user interaction (opening a link) and successful exploitation could lead to encrypted e-mail content leakage via messages/sent?format=js and popup?format=js.
CVE-2020-26241
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. This is a Consensus vulnerability in Geth before version 1.9.17 which can be used to cause a chain-split where vulnerable nodes reject the canonical chain. Geth's pre-compiled dataCopy (at 0x00...04) co...
CVE-2020-26242
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. In Geth before version 1.9.18, there is a Denial-of-service (crash) during block processing. This is fixed in 1.9.18.
CVE-2020-26240
PUBLISHED: 2020-11-25
Go Ethereum, or "Geth", is the official Golang implementation of the Ethereum protocol. An ethash mining DAG generation flaw in Geth before version 1.9.24 could cause miners to erroneously calculate PoW in an upcoming epoch (estimated early January, 2021). This happened on the ETC chain on...