Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Cloud Security //

AWS

4/6/2018
09:35 AM
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
Larry Loeb
50%
50%

Don't Call AWS' CloudFront Hijacking Problem a Vulnerability

Amazon Web Service might be the biggest of the big cloud providers, but it still has some security concerns. A researcher has noticed the company is open to having its CloudFront service hijacked, but Amazon officials won't call it a vulnerability.

Amazon Web Services is trying rather hard to get its security game going to the next level. But security researchers keep finding new ways to mess with it.

The newest one is from MindPoint Group, and involves the AWS CloudFront CDN service. Security analyst Matt Westfall found out that in a misconfigured CloudFront account, subdomains of legitimate sites could be hijacked.

This is, at root, a flaw in CloudFront.

While each CloudFront distribution will have a unique endpoint for users to point their DNS records to, all of the domains using a specific distribution must be listed in the "Alternate Domain Names" (CNAMEs) field in the options for that distribution.

(Source: Security Now)
(Source: Security Now)

However, when the CDN gets a request, it uses the HOST header of the request to determine which distribution to use. In this scenario, if the HOST header does not match an entry in the "Alternate Domain Names" (CNAMEs) field of the intended distribution, the request will fail.

Any other distribution that contains the specific domain in the HOST header will receive the request and respond to it normally. This is the mechanism that enables the hijack to occur.

The binding mechanism that should be in place inside CloudFront is then easily bypassed. A request to one specific CloudFront subdomain will not be limited to only that associated distribution list.

In his blog, Westfall wrote about how he tested out his observation.

What Westfall ended up doing is creating a Python script that would test for misconfiguration and repoint vulnerable subdomains to the target of his choice.

In his test, he ran the script for a few days and found that he had hijacked a lot of high-profile subdomains. They included two distinct US Federal "dot gov" organizations, Bloomberg Businessweek, Commonwealth Bank of Australia, Dow Jones, Harvard University, Red Cross and Reuters.

The problem seemed to be widespread.

The AWS response was interesting.

Westfall discussed what he found out with the AWS Security team and the CloudFront engineers. As he put it, "...while they accept that the nuances of CloudFront's routing mechanism leave room for improvement, at no time have they decided to treat this issue as a vulnerability."


The fundamentals of network security are being redefined -- don't get left in the dark by a DDoS attack! Join us in Austin from May 14-16 at the fifth-annual Big Communications Event. There's still time to register and communications service providers get in free!

Huh.

Westfall recommends that "most AWS customers with a single distribution can protect themselves by adding a wildcard domain (such as *.disloops.com) to the "Alternate Domain Names" (CNAMEs) field.

Amazon isn't totally ignoring this, either.

The CloudFront console now displays a popup when a user removes a CNAME from a CloudFront distribution that warns them to keep their DNS records in sync with their CloudFront distribution. Such a synchronization would prevent the possibility of hijacking.

Amazon has been getting more security conscious lately.

At the AWS Summit this week, the cloud provider introduced new automation tools for making secure apps easier to run in AWS. (See AWS Expands Cloud Security Automation.)

Although the company doesn't consider the CloudFront situation a vulnerability, its engineers are trying to help users avoid the situation where it could happen. They seem to have realized that just the selling of runtime on someone else's computer may not be the entire business model that is needed for success.

Related posts:

— Larry Loeb has written for many of the last century's major "dead tree" computer magazines, having been, among other things, a consulting editor for BYTE magazine and senior editor for the launch of WebWeek.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
I Smell a RAT! New Cybersecurity Threats for the Crypto Industry
David Trepp, Partner, IT Assurance with accounting and advisory firm BPM LLP,  7/9/2021
News
Attacks on Kaseya Servers Led to Ransomware in Less Than 2 Hours
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  7/7/2021
Commentary
It's in the Game (but It Shouldn't Be)
Tal Memran, Cybersecurity Expert, CYE,  7/9/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Concerns over supply chain vulnerabilities and attack visibility drove some significant changes in enterprise cybersecurity strategies over the past year. Dark Reading's 2021 Strategic Security Survey showed that many organizations are staying the course regarding the use of a mix of attack prevention and threat detection technologies and practices for dealing with cyber threats.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-42258
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
BQE BillQuick Web Suite 2018 through 2021 before 22.0.9.1 allows SQL injection for unauthenticated remote code execution, as exploited in the wild in October 2021 for ransomware installation. SQL injection can, for example, use the txtID (aka username) parameter. Successful exploitation can include ...
CVE-2020-28968
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Draytek VigorAP 1000C contains a stored cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the RADIUS Setting - RADIUS Server Configuration module. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary web scripts or HTML via a crafted payload in the username input field.
CVE-2020-28969
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Aplioxio PDF ShapingUp 5.0.0.139 contains a buffer overflow which allows attackers to cause a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted PDF file.
CVE-2020-36485
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Portable Ltd Playable v9.18 was discovered to contain an arbitrary file upload vulnerability in the filename parameter of the upload module. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted JPEG file.
CVE-2020-36486
PUBLISHED: 2021-10-22
Swift File Transfer Mobile v1.1.2 and below was discovered to contain a cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability via the 'path' parameter of the 'list' and 'download' exception-handling.