Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Careers & People

5/30/2017
05:53 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Securing the Human a Full-Time Commitment

Encouraging the people in your organization to make safer cyber decisions requires dedicated brainpower to pull off, SANS study shows.

While most enterprises today boast at least some sort of security awareness training program, the fruits of those labors are a mixed bag. In fact, when measured on a five-tier security awareness maturity model, only about 10% of organizations can boast the highest two tiers of maturity, according to a study out from SANS Institute today.

The study's findings show that a lot of the varied success has to do with one simple and unavoidable factor - staffers dedicated to training efforts.

It may seem like a no-brainer, but the truth is that many organizations today are stuck with subpar security awareness training because they are simply tacking duties around the organization and implementation of an awareness program onto existing security staffers' job descriptions.

"If you've got somebody that's spending only 10%, 15%, or 20% of their time dedicated to awareness, you're just checking the box," says Lance Spitzner, director of SANS Securing the Human program, who helped spearhead the 2017 Security Awareness Report.

In its third year running, the report questioned over 1,000 security awareness professionals worldwide about the state of their awareness training programs at their organizations. The survey showed that about half of organizations are in the middle stage of program maturity - promoting awareness and behavior change - while over 27% are still stuck in compliance focus.

Only about 7.6% of organizations say their program is nonexistent, although selection bias may have played a part in this low number, given the type of participants chosen for this study. According to the 2016 Dark Reading Strategic Security Survey, only 56% of participants reported that their organization provided end-user awareness training. A different survey from ESET out earlier this month shows that one in three employees do not receive any form of cybersecurity training at their organization and one in five employee respondents said they are "not at all" aware of cyber security best practices. 

Meanwhile, the organizations really making a dent with their existing security programs are rare indeed. SANS found that about 9.8% of organizations had reached the maturity of long-term sustainment and culture change. Meanwhile, just .85% of organizations have gotten to the point where they've got a metrics framework that can tie awareness training to security readiness.

The SANS report took a look at the top two categories of performance and found that one of the biggest factors correlated to success was full-time employee commitment. The report found that the minimum level of staffing for a program to change behavior at an organizational level was 1.4 full-time employees. Meanwhile, the most successful programs had at least 2.6 full-time employees dedicated to awareness.

According to Spitzner, the number of people dedicated to the program trumped even overall budget as a success factor. 

"Awareness programs are all about collaboration, communication, and partnerships, and that takes time," he explains. "Some of the most effective awareness programs are high impact, but low budget, because they're using existing resources, ambassador programs, champion programs and even existing graphic design capabilities."

As a result, Spitzner says the number one recommendation coming out of the report is for organizations to heavily funnel awareness dollars to human resources than to fancy technology. 

"I don't want to say that to be successful you can't use external resources or buy things. What I'm saying is awareness is not just about buying a big flashy box," he says. "It doesn't have to cost a lot of money. [The team] just needs time to put it together."

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
7 Ways VPNs Can Turn from Ally to Threat
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  9/21/2019
Security Pros Value Disclosure ... Sometimes
Dark Reading Staff 9/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: I wish they'd put a sock in it.
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-10754
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-23
Multiple classes used within Apereo CAS before release 6.1.0-RC5 makes use of apache commons-lang3 RandomStringUtils for token and ID generation which makes them predictable due to RandomStringUtils PRNG's algorithm not being cryptographically strong.
CVE-2019-10755
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-23
The SAML identifier generated within SAML2Utils.java was found to make use of the apache commons-lang3 RandomStringUtils class which makes them predictable due to RandomStringUtils PRNG's algorithm not being cryptographically strong. This issue only affects the 3.X release of pac4j-saml.
CVE-2019-1255
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-23
A denial of service vulnerability exists when Microsoft Defender improperly handles files, aka 'Microsoft Defender Denial of Service Vulnerability'.
CVE-2019-1367
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-23
A remote code execution vulnerability exists in the way that the scripting engine handles objects in memory in Internet Explorer, aka 'Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability'. This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2019-1221.
CVE-2019-11277
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-23
Cloud Foundry NFS Volume Service, 1.7.x versions prior to 1.7.11 and 2.x versions prior to 2.3.0, is vulnerable to LDAP injection. A remote authenticated malicious space developer can potentially inject LDAP filters via service instance creation, facilitating the malicious space developer to deny se...