Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Breach Awareness Made Easy

50%
50%

What if companies had to disclose breach history in the same way food companies display nutritional information?

Comment  | 
Print  | 
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
ODA155
0%
100%
ODA155,
User Rank: Ninja
10/9/2014 | 3:12:02 PM
Re: Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
I think you're looking for a simple solution to a very complicated problem. So, my question, who explains to the consumer what a CrossSite Scripting attack is... DDoS or SQL Injection?

Instead, I would recommend something like this, although government sponsored. If you want to get people attention they will need to know what you're talking about and if you search this DB you will see the shock value it could have if more people (consumers) were aware of its existance.

 

Chronology of Data Breaches Security Breaches 2005 - Present

https://www.privacyrights.org/data-breach

 
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
10/6/2014 | 2:09:01 PM
Re: Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
@Marilyn  Definitely hard to argue against more transparency when it comes to breaches. One thing that's going to take some time to do, though, is to educate the general public.so that they'd actually understand what the heck the data meant. Maybe things like "cross-site scripting vulnerabilities" on an app security box would only matter to IT people anyway. But a breach disclosure box for the general public would have to be a bit simpler.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
10/6/2014 | 1:54:21 PM
Re: Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
That appsec lable, is cool, isn't it? Would be a litte trick to implemment for web apps, to be sure. But it's hard to argue against the idea of more transparency when it comes to breach disclosure.... 
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
10/6/2014 | 12:47:21 PM
Re: Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
@Marilyn  Ooo I like the OWASP version with app security too. The tricky thing with doing it for Web apps is that you could only focus on the app and not the implementation on the Website, since looking for vulnerabilities on someone else's site is illegal without permission.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
9/29/2014 | 8:02:03 AM
Re: Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
Agreed, Robert. More so, I think a public disclosure of breach history would put security right where it belongs -- on the front burner of the C-suite which sould give security teams much more clout and visibility for getting the resources they need to be proactive.
Robert McDougal
50%
50%
Robert McDougal,
User Rank: Ninja
9/28/2014 | 1:29:52 PM
Re: Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
Not only would it make the information more digestable and understandable for consumers, it would additionally drive business away from the poorest performers and shepard business to the most secure companies.   I like it.
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
9/26/2014 | 4:27:01 PM
Security Seals of approval (or disapproval)
This isn't totally analagous but Jeff Williams creator of the OWASP Top 10 came up with a similar idea for application security. I'm sure something similar could come be fashioned for data breach disclosure. Check it out: 

on security. Take a look 

 
Microsoft Patches Wormable RCE Vulns in Remote Desktop Services
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  8/13/2019
The Mainframe Is Seeing a Resurgence. Is Security Keeping Pace?
Ray Overby, Co-Founder & President at Key Resources, Inc.,  8/15/2019
GitHub Named in Capital One Breach Lawsuit
Dark Reading Staff 8/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-15224
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
The rest-client gem 1.6.13 for Ruby, as distributed on RubyGems.org, included a code-execution backdoor inserted by a third party.
CVE-2019-15225
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
In Envoy through 1.11.1, users may configure a route to match incoming path headers via the libstdc++ regular expression implementation. A remote attacker may send a request with a very long URI to result in a denial of service (memory consumption). This is a related issue to CVE-2019-14993.
CVE-2019-15223
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.1.8. There is a NULL pointer dereference caused by a malicious USB device in the sound/usb/line6/driver.c driver.
CVE-2019-15211
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.2.6. There is a use-after-free caused by a malicious USB device in the drivers/media/v4l2-core/v4l2-dev.c driver because drivers/media/radio/radio-raremono.c does not properly allocate memory.
CVE-2019-15212
PUBLISHED: 2019-08-19
An issue was discovered in the Linux kernel before 5.1.8. There is a double-free caused by a malicious USB device in the drivers/usb/misc/rio500.c driver.