Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Analytics

6/19/2006
09:46 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Blue Coat Partners to Plug Leaks

Vendors combine technologies to help create 'leak prevention' solution

Blue Coat Systems and PortAuthority today announced that their appliances can now work together to secure email, HTTP, FTP, and instant messaging traffic.

Blue Coat SG catches malware and spyware, while PortAuthority's appliance monitors and enforces security policies for these types of traffic, the companies say.

"This is just another sign that leak prevention is getting some traction in the industry," says Richard Stiennon, IT-Harvest. "Blue Coat is one of the largest proxy appliance vendors. PortAuthority has made an important partnership with an established vendor."

Getting a handle on what's going out of the network can be tricky: An employee using Web mail could unknowingly reveal information about an upcoming financial report with a casual comment in a personal message to someone outside the organization, for instance, or IT may not be able to decrypt an outgoing HTTP-S message that's sent outside the corporate messaging system. Leaks can be accidental or malicious, but either way, they can prove deadly to a corporation.

"The organization doesn't own traffic between an internal user and the external application, and it doesn't have access to it," says Shelendra Sharma, product marketing manager for Blue Coat. "In the past, that would be a blind spot for IT."

Blue Coat last month struck a similar integration arrangement with Vontu, PortAuthority's main competitor in the outbound monitoring space. Why the two deals? "Our idea was to allow the customer the most flexibility in choosing their products," Sharma says.

"Leak prevention" is a hot topic in compliance circles these days, but it was the risk of personal data loss that drove NIH Credit Union to recently add Blue Coat's SG appliance to its network, integrating it with its existing PortAuthority's Information Leak Prevention appliance.

"It was more because of the increase in identity theft cases and our desire to protect our members' information any way possible," says Kirk Drake, vice president of IT for NIH Credit Union.

Drake says, ideally he'd rather have the features rolled into one box instead of two. But the reality is that security tools have emerged piecemeal. "Eventually, we will consolidate many of [our] security products to ease the management overhead."

Blue Coat is catching up to some rival vendors that already have some of the same secure content management features. Secure Computing's WebWasher Secure Content Management suite, for example, already does most of what the Blue Coat/PortAuthority combination will do, officials say. WebWasher also intercepts incoming SSL traffic as well as Skype, another gaping hole in today's corporate networks.

— Kelly Jackson Higgins, Senior Editor, Dark Reading

Companies mentioned in this article:

  • Blue Coat Systems Inc. (Nasdaq: BCSI)
  • PortAuthority Technologies Inc.
  • Secure Computing Corp. (Nasdaq: SCUR)

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 5/28/2020
    Stay-at-Home Orders Coincide With Massive DNS Surge
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/27/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon Contest
    Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
    Latest Comment: Can you smell me now?
    Current Issue
    How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
    This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
    Flash Poll
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-11844
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    There is an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Micro Focus Service Management Automation (SMA) product affecting version 2018.05 to 2020.02. The vulnerability could be exploited to provide unauthorized access to the Container Deployment Foundation.
    CVE-2020-6937
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    A Denial of Service vulnerability in MuleSoft Mule CE/EE 3.8.x, 3.9.x, and 4.x released before April 7, 2020, could allow remote attackers to submit data which can lead to resource exhaustion.
    CVE-2020-7648
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.72.2 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads for users who have access to Snyk's internal network by appending the URL with a fragment identifier and a whitelisted path e.g. `#package.json`
    CVE-2020-7650
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker after 4.72.0 including and before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Arbitrary File Read. It allows arbitrary file reads to users with access to Snyk's internal network of any files ending in the following extensions: yaml, yml or json.
    CVE-2020-7654
    PUBLISHED: 2020-05-29
    All versions of snyk-broker before 4.73.1 are vulnerable to Information Exposure. It logs private keys if logging level is set to DEBUG.