Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

11/21/2013
06:07 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Who's The Boss Over Your JBoss Servers?

If you haven't patched a 2011 vulnerability found in more than 21,000 servers connected online, then the answer could be the person who installed a crimeware webshell

A widely unpatched vulnerability in JBoss Application Server (AS) discovered back in 2011 is opening up tens of thousands of enterprise data center servers to attack, with at least 500 actively compromised, according to a report out this week by Imperva. The analysis done by Imperva's security research team suggests that enterprises are not hardening their servers adequately and as a result are putting their entire data center operations at risk.

"The attackers are looking to circumvent methods that are supposed to be hardened because they expect vendors not to do a good job hardening their administrative access or functions," says Barry Shteiman, director of security strategy for Imperva. "Because of that, attackers are using that to inject standard or classic forms of attack -- in this case, a webshell -- which generally allows them full control over the server."

In this instance, Shteiman and his team noticed the attack trend after seeing a surge of attacks in online systems that demonstrated features they hadn't commonly seen before. Looking into it further, the team found the attacks all shared a distinct commonality: They were all suffered by JBoss servers.

"When we looked into it, we found that JBoss has a component called HTTPInvoker, and that component was found vulnerable, similarly to some other vulnerabilities we looked into recently that basically allowed an administrative function to be accessed without actually being an administrator logged in," Shteiman says. "In this case, it's a function that is supposed to populate new servlets or new pieces of code in the server. In a default state, JBoss allows that function to be used by anyone that wants it."

[How do you know if you've been breached? See Top 15 Indicators of Compromise.]

Attackers leveraged that hole to inject a webshell on vulnerable servers and achieve "full control over the data center," says Shteiman. He says that his research has shown there are likely around 500 JBoss servers currently compromised at the moment, by anywhere between 15 to 17 flavors of webshells. Among those, the most popular are a webshell called pwn.jsp that was demonstrated in an exploit published last month, along with a more slick crimeware webshell called JspSpy.

As Shteiman explains, JBoss AS is the de facto server platform for enterprises writing applications in Java.

"A lot of trading companies and banks are using it to hold up their main banking applications," says Shteiman. Even more frightening is its popularity among technology vendors that use it as a component for enterprise products and who could potentially be compromised before even shipping, essentially sending out products with built-in backdoors, he says.

The vulnerability in question was actually found in 2011 by Luca Carettoni, at the time a senior security consultant for Matasano Security, who then reported about 7,000 servers online susceptible to the vulnerability. Since then, rather than declining, the number of vulnerable servers has tripled, says Shteiman, who believes that part of the problem was a misclassification in the CVE database.

"It was classified as a vulnerability that affected product elements of HP ProCurve, and therefore I don't think anyone ever understood the research to its full effect," he says.

Nevertheless, security experts say this is something that should have been caught by more organizations, given the age of the vulnerability discovery.

"When the solution to this JBoss exploit is to simply update the affected servers, there is hardly any excuse for anyone to be affected by it, especially when the vulnerability has been discovered more than two years ago," says Michael Yuen, security engineer at application security firm Cenzic.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message. Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...