Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

3/5/2016
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

When Encryption Becomes The Enemys Best Friend

The growth in SSL/TLS traffic has made it a lot easier for threat actors to slip attacks and malware past enterprise defenses.

The growth in the use of Secure Sockets Layer/Transport Layer Security (SSL/TLS) encryption has turned out to be a distinctly double edge sword for enterprises.

On the one hand, the technology has enabled much greater privacy and security for organizations and individuals using the Internet to communicate and transact business, which is pretty much everyone these days. Online banking, mobile applications, cloud servers, web applications and cloud devices all rely on keys and certificates to authenticate, verify and trust. Even search engines these days encrypt results to preserve user privacy.

But the same encryption is also allowing cyber criminals and threat actors of all types to slip past enterprise defenses with alarming ease. Increasingly, attackers are taking advantage of SSL/TLS to hide their malware from intrusion prevention systems and anti-malware products, and also to encrypt their communications with command and control systems.

Dell, which recently released its threat report for 2015, points to an example where attackers used these tactics to redirect some 900 million Yahoo users to a malicious website hosting the Angler exploit kit.

According to Dell, there was a sharp increase in SSL/TLS encryption through 2015. In the fourth quarter of 2015 nearly 65 percent of all web connections that Dell observed were encrypted, leading to a lot more under-the-radar attacks, according to the company. Gartner has predicted that 50 percent of all network attacks will take advantage of SSL/TLS by 2017.

“Attackers are looking for new channels that they can use to slip inside the perimeter and land on vulnerable end points,” says Dmitriy Ayrapetov, director of product management, Dell Security in comments to Dark Reading.  “An encrypted channel such as SSL/TLS is relatively easy to set up and is usually not monitored by most companies, thus providing potential safe passage for malware past the perimeter security defenses.”

What has made the trend particularly worrisome is that servers and security applications are designed to implicitly trust cryptographic keys and digital certificates, and are seldom able to differentiate between good and bad traffic. As a result, many of the security tools, that enterprises rely on for protection like firewalls and IDS and IPS systems are essentially blind to malware flowing past them in encrypted traffic, according to security analysts.

The trend has grabbed the attention of enterprise executives. In a recent global survey of 500 CIOs conducted by Vanson Bourne on behalf of security vendor Venafi, 90 percent said they already have experienced or expect to experience, a network attack using SSL/TLS. About 86 percent expressed concern about stolen digital certificates and encryption keys becoming a big market for cybercriminals in the next few years while 87 percent believed their defenses were less effective because of the trend by criminals to use encryption to hide attacks.

“Security systems are failing because of the blind spots created by the rapid rise in encryption, keys, and certificates,” says Kevin Bocek, vice president of security strategy and threat intelligence at Venafi.

In growing numbers, organizations are using SSL/TLS, SSH and code signing keys and digital certificates to authenticate everything from websites and web admins to providing secure VPN access to authorizing the software that will run on devices, Bocek said in comments to Dark Reading.

Encryption keys and certificates are being created and issued by different parts of the organization in significant numbers with little central control or visibility into why, where and how they are being used. “For example, 100 different developers, security operations, or networks operations teams may be responsible for dozens or hundreds of TLS/keys and certificates without the others knowing about them,” Bocek says. “And now with the rise of DevOps and containerization machines are creating TLS/keys and certificates on their own.”

The lack of centralized control and visibility over the whole process has allowed criminals to misuse unprotected keys and certificates to hide malware in encrypted traffic and to take other malicious actions like elevating privileges, spoofing websites and stealing data.

One of the best approaches for dealing with the problem is to have controls in place for scanning SSL traffic at the enterprise gateway, says Dell’s Ayrapetov. “There is a multitude of tools, including firewalls, that will decrypt SSL/TLS traffic for deep packet inspection, extending existing network security protection to encrypted communication channels,” he says.

Related Content: 

 

Interop 2016 Las VegasFind out more about security threats at Interop 2016, May 2-6, at the Mandalay Bay Convention Center, Las Vegas. Register today and receive an early bird discount of $200.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Radly
50%
50%
Radly,
User Rank: Apprentice
3/10/2016 | 1:12:19 PM
misleading headline
Reading the entire article, it becomes obvious that poorly implemented incryption, due to incompetent management is the problem. Incryption is not the problem.
Florida Town Pays $600K to Ransomware Operators
Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/20/2019
Pledges to Not Pay Ransomware Hit Reality
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  6/21/2019
AWS CISO Talks Risk Reduction, Development, Recruitment
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  6/25/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-1619
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to bypass authentication and execute arbitrary actions with administrative privileges on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper session ...
CVE-2019-1620
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to upload arbitrary files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permission settings in affected DCNM software. An attacker could ex...
CVE-2019-1621
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to gain access to sensitive files on an affected device. The vulnerability is due to incorrect permissions settings on affected DCNM software. An attacker...
CVE-2019-1622
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-27
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Data Center Network Manager (DCNM) could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information from an affected device. The vulnerability is due to improper access controls for certain URLs on affected DCNM software...
CVE-2019-10133
PUBLISHED: 2019-06-26
A flaw was found in Moodle before 3.7, 3.6.4, 3.5.6, 3.4.9 and 3.1.18. The form to upload cohorts contained a redirect field, which was not restricted to internal URLs.