Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

10/4/2017
02:30 PM
Mike Shultz
Mike Shultz
Commentary
50%
50%

What Security Teams Need to Know about the NIAC Report

Which of the recommendations made by the NIAC working group will affect security teams the most, and how should they prepare?

A report from the National Infrastructure Advisory Commission (NIAC) suggests that the United States is in a "pre-9/11 moment." The authors were addressing the potential of a catastrophic cyber attack against the US that could result in the cyber equivalent of the 9/11 attack.

After the cybersecurity executive order was issued in May, the National Security Council (NSC) tapped the NIAC to determine how federal agencies and capabilities could be applied to improve the cybersecurity of critical infrastructure assets. They focused on assets that, if attacked, could result in "catastrophic regional or national effects on public health or safety, economic security, or national security." Which of the recommendations will affect security teams, and what should they do to prepare? These developments, arising from three specific recommendations should be tracked closely:

1. Recommendation: Identify the best-in-class scanning tools and assessment practices, and then apply them to the most critical networks.

A security team may do a good job of testing its own networks, but connections with other networks (e.g., vendors and partners) that are necessary for conducting business serve to limit overall operational security. Making broadly available the best assessment tools will benefit not only direct users of your product or service but increase overall nationwide security when done in collective effort with other enterprises. A "Center of Excellence" for scanning and assessment tools will create a testing environment to evaluate software that can be used widely, but, in particular, small and midsize businesses and educational institutions that otherwise might lag behind large organizations.

Action: Security teams should track this development because it is intended to support best practices in a shared environment that will make network testing more effective and less costly.

2. Recommendation: Establish limited-time, outcome-based market incentives to encourage organizations to upgrade cyber infrastructure, invest in state-of-the-art technologies, and meet industry standards or best practices.

Budgetary constraints sometimes lead organizations to make suboptimal decisions about the types of processes and technologies they implement to prevent cyber attacks. The NIAC report recommends implementing tax credits to enable and encourage security system upgrades, which will free up significant financial resources that can be directed toward improving cyber resilience.

It also urges relief from government security audits when industry standards are consistently met. How can anyone tell when industry standards are met? The Commission strongly recommends implementing the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework in order to qualify for incentives.

Action: Security teams should begin orienting their cybersecurity program around the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, and they should track and support the development of legislation to provide incentives to organizations that can demonstrate a standardized level of cyber maturity.

3. Recommendation: Establish separate, secure communications networks specifically designated for the most critical cyber networks.

While the primary inspiration for this recommendation is the utility industry's IT and OT networks, the definition of "critical infrastructure" has broadened. It now includes other systems of computing networks without which the country couldn't operate, including financial systems. As the threats escalate and attacks become more organized, leveraging "dark fiber" networks and other alternatives for key critical communications is highly recommended.  

Action: In addition to tracking the development of dark fiber networks, security teams supporting critical infrastructure should identify the most critical communication processes and evaluate how those can be hardened, including the use of private networks. 

The urgency depicted in the NIAC report and the increasing frequency and impact of large breaches like Equifax is accelerating the government's concern with the state of the nation's cybersecurity. We recommend keeping an eye on the steps that will be taken based on the report's recommendations, as we may be heading toward a cyber Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

Related Content:

Join Dark Reading LIVE for two days of practical cyber defense discussions. Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable IT security experts. Check out the INsecurity agenda here.

Mike Shultz is CEO and founder of Cybernance, a SAFETY Act-designated company that regulated industries, public companies, and government agencies rely on to oversee and manage cyber-risk. Previously, Shultz was CEO of cybersecurity firm Infoglide Software, the application ... View Full Bio
Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Why Cyber-Risk Is a C-Suite Issue
Marc Wilczek, Digital Strategist & CIO Advisor,  11/12/2019
Unreasonable Security Best Practices vs. Good Risk Management
Jack Freund, Director, Risk Science at RiskLens,  11/13/2019
Breaches Are Inevitable, So Embrace the Chaos
Ariel Zeitlin, Chief Technology Officer & Co-Founder, Guardicore,  11/13/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2016-5285
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Null pointer dereference vulnerability exists in K11_SignWithSymKey / ssl3_ComputeRecordMACConstantTime in NSS before 3.26, which causes the TLS/SSL server using NSS to crash.
CVE-2009-5047
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Jetty 6.x before 6.1.22 suffers from an escape sequence injection vulnerability from two different vectors: 1) "Cookie Dump Servlet" and 2) Http Content-Length header. 1) A POST request to the form at "/test/cookie/" with the "Age" parameter set to a string throws a &qu...
CVE-2013-4584
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
Perdition before 2.2 may have weak security when handling outbound connections, caused by an error in the STARTTLS IMAP and POP server. ssl_outgoing_ciphers not being applied to STARTTLS connections
CVE-2013-7087
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
ClamAV before 0.97.7 has WWPack corrupt heap memory
CVE-2013-7088
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-15
ClamAV before 0.97.7 has buffer overflow in the libclamav component