Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

TweetDeck Scammers Steal Twitter IDs Via OAuth

Users who give up their TweetDeck ID are promised 20 followers for free or 100 to 5,000 new followers a day for five days.

Scammers are abusing Twitter's TweetDeck tool as part of a scheme that has roped in thousands of Twitter users, according to Bitdefender.

The scammers, believed to be from Turkey, are profiting from users' desire to increase their Twitter following. In the past month, the scammers have registered dozens of sites dedicated to the scheme and promoted them through Twitter Trends.

On the site, the scammers ask the victims for a Twitter username and lure them with an offer to purchase new followers or get them for free. Those who click on the free option get 20 followers immediately. Those who pay the premium are promised 100 to 5,000 new followers a day for five days. To get the new followers, users must authorize the TweetDeck. In the process, the scammers make off with the users' authentication tokens and receive TweetDeck's permissions without the users' knowledge.

Bitdefender online threats researcher Andrei Serbanoiu says the scammers are using an old trick to abuse the Twitter OAuth standard in the application programming interface.

"OAuth is practically an authentication protocol that allows users to approve apps to act on their behalf without sharing their password," he says. With follower schemes, scammers hijack tokens by abusing this protocol that authenticates Twitter's legitimate app TweetDeck. Researchers have been issuing warnings for a while about this ability to craft special links that may open Twitter app authorization pages for legitimate apps.

"When hijacked, these requests specify the attacker's server as a callback URL, redirecting Twitter access tokens to the attackers' command and control center," Serbanoiu says. "Tokens may be as valuable as passwords and may be used to add Twitter clients to follower bots. Scammers may also post on their behalf, follow other accounts, and even read and send private messages."

Unlike other follower scams, this scheme actually does deliver additional followers -- something that has become a bit of a business. According to researchers at Barracuda Labs, the price for buying Twitter followers has dropped to $8 per 1,000 followers.

"One thing we have noticed is that fake Twitter accounts are better at disguising themselves to look more like real accounts," says Dr. Jason Ding, research scientist at Barracuda Labs. "They have begun to engage in conversations, retweet, comment, and favorite tweets in order to look like a real account. Additionally, we have seen the prices for fake Instagram followers and Facebook likes drop more than 30% in the last six months. We believe this indicated that the owners of these fake followers may have found some effective ways to easily create lots of fake followers and likes on these platforms."

To reduce the number of hijacked accounts, Serbanoiu says, Twitter has implemented two-factor authentication and started to educate the public better. "As other social media platforms, they try to cope with security issues on a regular basis. However, cyber criminals have a prosperous business to keep, so they continue to create new scams as fast as they are taken down."

Bitdefender advises users who were tricked in the scam to uninstall TweetDeck and reauthorize it, and run a security scan to check for malware on any devices they used to log into Twitter.

Brian Prince is a freelance writer for a number of IT security-focused publications. Prior to becoming a freelance reporter, he worked at eWEEK for five years covering not only security, but also a variety of other subjects in the tech industry. Before that, he worked as a ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
6/9/2014 | 11:29:54 AM
Re: onliune jobs
@gev  We're keeping an eye on that, but if you ever see spammers feel free to drop us a line to point them out.
Sara Peters
50%
50%
Sara Peters,
User Rank: Author
6/9/2014 | 11:28:16 AM
Can't help myself...
Okay I know this is tangential, but I can't help but make a small gripe about how silly the marketing industry is getting. Advertisers are more likely to buy ads/sponsorships if a company has a bunch of Twitter followers, even if the company simply buys a bunch of "followers" that might not even be real people or people who are legitimately interested in the brand. 

A scam like this is easy because it feeds on this foolishness.
gev
50%
50%
gev,
User Rank: Moderator
6/9/2014 | 9:34:49 AM
Re: onliune jobs
While you highlight Tweeter security problems, scammers are posting their spam messages right here.

I have seen a lot of these spam posts on zdnet, but this site is about security, and yet the same spam messages appear here, at the dark reading :-(

Physician, heal thyself !
RyanSepe
100%
0%
RyanSepe,
User Rank: Ninja
6/6/2014 | 5:26:29 PM
Valid vs Scam Tweet Deck users
How are we to discern between valid and scam tweetdeck requests? I am not as familiar with twitter. Or is tweetdeck in general the vulnerability? Either way, resintalling tweetdeck is definitely a good idea since it uses dual factor authentication even if you have not been exploited.
7 Tips for Infosec Pros Considering A Lateral Career Move
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/21/2020
For Mismanaged SOCs, The Price Is Not Right
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  1/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
IT 2020: A Look Ahead
Are you ready for the critical changes that will occur in 2020? We've compiled editor insights from the best of our network (Dark Reading, Data Center Knowledge, InformationWeek, ITPro Today and Network Computing) to deliver to you a look at the trends, technologies, and threats that are emerging in the coming year. Download it today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Organizations have invested in a sweeping array of security technologies to address challenges associated with the growing number of cybersecurity attacks. However, the complexity involved in managing these technologies is emerging as a major problem. Read this report to find out what your peers biggest security challenges are and the technologies they are using to address them.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2015-3154
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
CRLF injection vulnerability in Zend\Mail (Zend_Mail) in Zend Framework before 1.12.12, 2.x before 2.3.8, and 2.4.x before 2.4.1 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTTP headers and conduct HTTP response splitting attacks via CRLF sequences in the header of an email.
CVE-2019-17190
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
A Local Privilege Escalation issue was discovered in Avast Secure Browser 76.0.1659.101. The vulnerability is due to an insecure ACL set by the AvastBrowserUpdate.exe (which is running as NT AUTHORITY\SYSTEM) when AvastSecureBrowser.exe checks for new updates. When the update check is triggered, the...
CVE-2014-8161
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to obtain sensitive column values by triggering constraint violation and then reading the error message.
CVE-2014-9481
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The Scribunto extension for MediaWiki allows remote attackers to obtain the rollback token and possibly other sensitive information via a crafted module, related to unstripping special page HTML.
CVE-2015-0241
PUBLISHED: 2020-01-27
The to_char function in PostgreSQL before 9.0.19, 9.1.x before 9.1.15, 9.2.x before 9.2.10, 9.3.x before 9.3.6, and 9.4.x before 9.4.1 allows remote authenticated users to cause a denial of service (crash) or possibly execute arbitrary code via a (1) large number of digits when processing a numeric ...