Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

12/17/2014
10:15 AM
Jeff Williams
Jeff Williams
Commentary
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
Google+
RSS
E-Mail vvv
100%
0%

The New Target for State-Sponsored Cyber Attacks: Applications

Skilled hackers are now using simple web application vulnerabilities like SQL Injection to take over database servers. Are you prepared to defend against this new type of threat actor?

Historically, state-sponsored hackers have used memory corruption vulnerabilities like buffer overflows to create malware for their attacks, targeting operating systems and appliances written in C/C++. A new set of attacks, allegedly coming from Iran, is using a new strategy. Web applications and services, written in higher-level languages like Java and .NET, are being targeted to establish a foothold in your datacenter and pivot to other internal systems.

Escalating cyber attacks
In 2009, a highly organized attack known as “Operation Aurora” was carried out by hackers with alleged ties to the Chinese military. Aurora targeted executives' computers with Internet Explorer-based malware. Dozens of US corporations, including Adobe, Juniper, Rackspace, Yahoo, Symantec, Northrop Grumman, Morgan Stanley, and Dow Chemical, were targets. These attacks were successful in accessing, and possibly modifying, source code repositories.

Historically, state-sponsored cyber attacks are dominated by these malware-based exploits. Stuxnet, Duqu, and Flame are examples, allegedly orchestrated by the United States and Israel. These seriously harmed Iran’s nuclear program but also sparked Iran to develop its own cyber capability. Attacks against the Dutch certificate authority DigiNotar in 2011 were attributed to Iran. The following year, Shamoon, also attributed to Iran, was launched against gas companies based in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

Despite what you see from popular television shows such as CSI and Law and Order (and even worse, Scorpion), it’s sometimes very difficult to know for sure where an attack comes from. Moreover, organizations that have been hacked are under tremendous pressure to report details quickly. To minimize accusations and/or public perception of negligence, there’s pressure to state that the attacks are “sophisticated” or “state-sponsored.” So, while the exact origin of these attacks is not always clear, there is little question that cyber attacks are a priority for a variety of countries.

The move to application attacks
Very recently, attacks known as “Operation Cleaver,” attributed to Iran, have been revealed. For the past two years, these attacks have targeted critical infrastructure targets including airports, hospitals, telecommunications providers, chemical companies, and governments. More than 50 targets in 16 countries have been successfully compromised.

What makes Operation Cleaver different is that the attacks do not rely on malware to leverage memory exploits. Instead, they are primarily using SQL Injection to take over database servers through web applications. Once inside, the attackers use the database server to launch additional attacks on internal networks. The scary part is that, while these exploits are just as devastating as malware-based attacks, they are considerably easier to find and exploit.

[Find out more about how, With Operation Cleaver, Iran Emerges As A Cyberthreat.]

The “Operation Cleaver Report” issued by Cylance claims that “Initial compromise techniques include SQL injection, web attacks, and creative deception based attacks – all of which have been implemented in the past by Chinese and Russian hacking teams.”

The attackers sent SQL Injection attacks that were designed to trick the victim’s database software into executing arbitrary commands, using “xp_cmdshell.” Here is an example targeting a ColdFusion server, from the Cylance report:

The attackers would then send commands through the compromised database server to target other backend systems. Here is an example attempting to use FTP, from the Cylance report:

Renowned security expert Charlie Miller gave a great talk a few years ago on how to build a nation-state Red Team on the cheap. He suggested that for $100 million, a country could bring about “Internet Armageddon.” However, he didn’t consider using simple web application vulnerabilities like the ones in use in the Cleaver attacks. Given the ease and pervasiveness of these vulnerabilities, it might be possible to create an application-focused Cyber Army with much less investment.

We are not ready
The unfortunate reality is that most companies and government agencies are only barely prepared for the very lowest level of threat: the auditor. Auditors are always several years behind the state-of-the-art, because they are using regulations or standards that were drafted years ago and only cover a minimal set of interests. With most security efforts focused on compliance, virtually all organizations are totally unprepared for skilled threat actors, like expert individuals or state-sponsored groups. We should be building systems designed to resist the attacks that we expect 10 years from now, not the attacks that occurred two years ago.

My colleagues at Aspect Security review thousands of applications with manual code review and manual penetration testing. On average, they find a stunning 22.4 serious vulnerabilities per application, and their work unearths thousands of vulnerabilities every year. With the threat of state-sponsored hackers targeting these vulnerabilities on the rise, the time is now to stamp out vulnerabilities like SQL Injection from your application portfolio. As Charlie Miller puts it, the “best defense is to eliminate vulnerabilities in software.”

A pioneer in application security, Jeff Williams is the founder and CTO of Contrast Security, a revolutionary application security product that enhances software with the power to defend itself, check itself for vulnerabilities, and join a security command and control ...
View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
Marilyn Cohodas
50%
50%
Marilyn Cohodas,
User Rank: Strategist
12/19/2014 | 10:04:35 AM
Sony -- the most recent example...
I guess we can add the North Korea hack of Sony email to the list of state-supported cyber application attacks...
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 6/5/2020
How AI and Automation Can Help Bridge the Cybersecurity Talent Gap
Peter Barker, Chief Product Officer at ForgeRock,  6/1/2020
Cybersecurity Spending Hits 'Temporary Pause' Amid Pandemic
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: What? IT said I needed virus protection!
Current Issue
How Cybersecurity Incident Response Programs Work (and Why Some Don't)
This Tech Digest takes a look at the vital role cybersecurity incident response (IR) plays in managing cyber-risk within organizations. Download the Tech Digest today to find out how well-planned IR programs can detect intrusions, contain breaches, and help an organization restore normal operations.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-13864
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
The Elementor Page Builder plugin before 2.9.9 for WordPress suffers from a stored XSS vulnerability. An author user can create posts that result in a stored XSS by using a crafted payload in custom links.
CVE-2020-13865
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
The Elementor Page Builder plugin before 2.9.9 for WordPress suffers from multiple stored XSS vulnerabilities. An author user can create posts that result in stored XSS vulnerabilities, by using a crafted link in the custom URL or by applying custom attributes.
CVE-2020-11696
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
In Combodo iTop a menu shortcut name can be exploited with a stored XSS payload. This is fixed in all iTop packages (community, essential, professional) in version 2.7.0 and iTop essential and iTop professional in version 2.6.4.
CVE-2020-11697
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
In Combodo iTop, dashboard ids can be exploited with a reflective XSS payload. This is fixed in all iTop packages (community, essential, professional) for version 2.7.0 and in iTop essential and iTop professional packages for version 2.6.4.
CVE-2020-13646
PUBLISHED: 2020-06-05
In the cheetah free wifi 5.1 driver file liebaonat.sys, local users are allowed to cause a denial of service (BSOD) or other unknown impact due to failure to verify the value of a specific IOCTL.