Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


01:20 PM
Connect Directly

Target To Settle Data Breach Lawsuit For $10 Million

Individuals who can prove financial damage can receive up to $10,000 under proposed deal.

Individuals who are able to prove they suffered financial losses as a direct result of the data breach at Target in late 2013 will be eligible for up to $10,000 in damages under a proposed settlement of a class-action lawsuit against the retailer.

Target will set aside $10 million in an interest-bearing escrow account to fund claims made by individuals under the settlement, court documents filed Wednesday in the U.S. District Court for the District of Minnesota show. Funds that remain after all claims have been settled will not revert back to Target and will instead be distributed according to the court’s instructions. Under the proposed settlement Target has also agreed not to contest any award of attorney’s fees that do not exceed $6.75 million the court documents show.

Somewhat unusually for a proposed settlement of this sort, Target will also take several steps to minimize the risk of a similar breach in future. The measures include Target’s continued designation of a chief information security officer for overseeing enterprise wide security, Target’s maintenance of a written security policy and, periodic review of the controls it has in place for protecting customer data.

The data breach at Target, which lasted between Nov. 27 and Dec. 15, 2013, exposed account information on an estimated 40 million credit and debit cards. The breach also exposed names, email addresses, and phone numbers of an additional 70 million Target customers.

Target spokeswoman Molly Snyder expressed the company’s satisfaction at the proposed settlement. “We are pleased to see the process moving forward and look forward to its resolution,” she said in a statement via email.

If approved, the settlement would be a significant win for victims of retail data breaches. Courts around the country have tended to routinely dismiss consumer class action lawsuits involving retail data breaches on the grounds that consumers do not really suffer tangible financial harm from them. The plaintiffs in most such cases have tried claiming damages for financial losses, time spent changing cards and reviewing credit reports, and even for identity theft.

With Target’s breach, the court documents show that the named plaintiffs who filed the lawsuit against the company had a reasonable shot at proving they suffered some harm as a direct result of the breach.

Avivah Litan, an analyst at Gartner said the proposed settlement sends a clear warning to other retailers. Judges typically dismiss such data breach class action lawsuits because consumers cannot prove damages. Under U.S. regulations and the operating rules of the major credit card brands, consumers do not usually bear the costs of fraudulent transactions on their cards.

So it is surprising to see Target agreeing to such a large settlement, she says.

“What this tells me broadly is that courts are now leaning against retailers and buying arguments that consumers do suffer damages in the form of late fees, blocked bank or credit accounts, and time spent undoing the damage from these direct and ancillary effects,” Litan says.

While consumers typically get reimbursed for fraudulent charges on their cards, there are these other costs that need to be factored as well. “This case shows that the courts are more sympathetic to consumers and are opining against retailers when it comes to these ‘softer’ damages," she says.

Generally, class action lawsuits of the sort filed against Target profit only the attorneys said Richard Stiennon, says chief research analyst at IT-Harvest. "That said, the settlement helps to quantify the potential damages that result from doing a bad job on security and may encourage other companies to look at doing a better job,” he says. "$10 million dollars would go a long way to hiring a good team, deploying good tools and changing security processes."

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
User Rank: Ninja
3/23/2015 | 1:53:04 PM
Target's Catch - 22 and IT Enlightenment
While I am happy some restitution is being offered. The issue is always in the details.

I have heard news accounts that you need to provide a receipt before you can get any of this money. Who keeps their target receipts for long ?

Also nice to hear that they plan on running their IT as an IT department. Apparently discovering after the fact that a chief information security officer role does actually exist.

Never to be outdone, the 10mil appears to be funded in a large part by recent layoffs and I assume to cover the cost of the newly minted CISO position.

Target. I am not impressed.
US Turning Up the Heat on North Korea's Cyber Threat Operations
Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  9/16/2019
Preventing PTSD and Burnout for Cybersecurity Professionals
Craig Hinkley, CEO, WhiteHat Security,  9/16/2019
NetCAT Vulnerability Is Out of the Bag
Dark Reading Staff 9/12/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability to coerce two parties into computing the same predictable shared key.
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during ECDSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover ECDSA keys.
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA BSAFE Crypto-J versions prior to 6.2.5 are vulnerable to an Information Exposure Through Timing Discrepancy vulnerabilities during DSA key generation. A malicious remote attacker could potentially exploit those vulnerabilities to recover DSA keys.
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P3 (, contain an information disclosure vulnerability. Information relating to the backend database gets disclosed to low-privileged RSA Archer users' UI under certain error conditions.
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-18
RSA Archer, versions prior to 6.6 P2 (, contain an improper authentication vulnerability. The vulnerability allows sysadmins to create user accounts with insufficient credentials. Unauthenticated attackers could gain unauthorized access to the system using those accounts.