Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.


12:27 PM
Dark Reading
Dark Reading
Products and Releases

Survey: 72% of Enterprises That Hire Outside Security Audits Say It Was A Worthwhile Investment

More than half felt that outside security audits resulted in identification of significant security problems

ALBUQUERQUE, N.M. and BOCA RATON, Fla., Sept. 29 /PRNewswire/ -- How often to audit or not to audit - and whether these audits should be conducted using internal staff or outside experts - were topics addressed in a series of questions posed to 350 IT Executives/Network Administrators this month in a survey commissioned by VanDyke Software and executed by independent firm Amplitude Research. The survey respondents, representing a cross-section of all sizes of companies, reported that in 2009, 76% of enterprises have employed outside experts to audit network security procedures, but only 35% conduct outside audits annually. Another 27% undergo such an audit every two years, and 14% undergo such an audit every three years or less often.

Slightly less than one-fourth (24%) reported that their organization has never had a formal security audit by an outside organization. When asked why they have never had one, nearly half (47%) felt they did not need one, and one-fourth (24%) mentioned cost.

Among those reporting outside security audits, nearly three-fourths (72%) indicated that they were a worthwhile investment. Most others were neutral (23%), while a small proportion disagreed (5%).

What motivates an organization to engage outside experts to conduct a security audit? One major reason was the ability to show other parties that the company has been audited (65%).

Separate from outside audits, two-thirds (67%) of the survey respondents reported undergoing an internalsecurity audit at least once a year. Another 17% undergo such an internal audit every two years.

Among those reporting internal security audits, close to half (46%) felt these audits resulted in identification of significant security problems. However, some felt their internal audits "don't go far enough" (33%) and/or their organization should undergo security audits more frequently (43%).

Commented Steve Birnkrant, Amplitude Research CEO, "These results can provide encouragement to companies to conduct outside security audits or increase the frequency of audits if already being conducted."

The 2009security study was commissioned by VanDyke Software and conducted online by Amplitude Research during the second week of September 2009 among Amplitude's nationwide technology panel and had 350 total survey respondents with a maximum sampling margin of error of 5.2%.To obtain an executive summary of the 2009 survey results, contact Michael Krems of Krems Public Relations [email protected]

About Amplitude Research, Inc.

Amplitude Research is a privately owned mail and online survey company headquartered in Boca Raton, Florida, with blue chip clients located throughout the United States, Canada and South America. Amplitude combines its proprietary research software, top quality market research panels, and experienced professional services to deliver actionable survey results. Amplitude's Panelspeak survey panels can reach more than 60,000 IT professionals in addition to consumers and business professionals. For more information about Amplitude Research and its market research surveys, visit the company's website at www.amplituderesearch.com.

About VanDyke Software, Inc.

Busy IT professionals depend on VanDyke Software to deliver rock-solid, easy-to-configure security software for secure remote access, secure file transfer, terminal emulation, and remote administration. VanDyke Software offers a fully supported 30-day evaluation of its products prior to purchase, providing both evaluators and customers with a higher level of service. The company's product offerings include the SecureCRT Secure Shell terminal emulator, the SecureFX secure file transfer client, the VanDyke ClientPack, and the VShell Secure Shell server. For more information about VanDyke Software, visit the company's website at www.vandyke.com.

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
SerComm AG Combo VD625 AGSOT_2.1.0 devices allow CRLF injection (for HTTP header injection) in the download function via the Content-Disposition header.
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in through SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. salt.modules.cmdmod can log credentials to the info or error log level.
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
In SaltStack Salt before 3002.5, eauth tokens can be used once after expiration. (They might be used to run command against the salt master or minions.)
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
An issue was discovered in SaltStack Salt before 3002.5. Sending crafted web requests to the Salt API can result in salt.utils.thin.gen_thin() command injection because of different handling of single versus double quotes. This is related to salt/utils/thin.py.
PUBLISHED: 2021-02-27
i-doit before 1.16.0 is affected by Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) issues that could allow remote authenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__TITLE, C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, SM2__C__MONITORING__CONFIG__PATH, C__M...