Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Study Reveals Overlooked Sources of Leaks

After you've secured your electronic perimeter, it's time to check the copier and the front door, ISF report says

There are a whole lot of ways for sensitive information to leak from your organization, and most of them wouldn't be prevented by data leak prevention tools, according to a new report issued today.

In a detailed study of 887 leak incidents, the Information Security Forum -- an international, non-profit consortium of security-focused enterprises and vendors -- found that many leaks are caused accidentally, often through non-technical means.

"Think about how often you hold the door open for a stranger carrying something heavy, or what you can overhear in a conversation on an airplane," says Simone Seth, senior research analyst at ISF. "That's the sort of thing we found over and over again in the study."

The research, which was conducted at the behest of ISF's member organizations, was designed to deliver an informal "snapshot" of the causes and effects of internal data leaks, Seth says. While there have been many studies recently on insider attacks, most of them focus primarily on online leaks, without taking into account the "old" sources of leaks that have been around for years, she observes.

"The technology has become more portable, and users are more savvy in how they use it," Seth says. "But fundamentally, nothing has really changed. Human behavior is exactly the same as it was years ago, and that's where most of your leaks are going to occur."

Lost laptops, emails sent to the wrong address, sensitive documents left on photocopiers, employees walking out of the building with confidential papers or storage media -- these are not new sources of leaks, but they remain the most common, the study finds.

"Most of these are accidental, not malicious," Seth says. "And most of them wouldn't be spotted by an online monitoring tool."

In addition, companies may lose data because employees simply aren't thinking about what they're doing, the report says. Some employees repeat sensitive information on social networking sites such as MySpace or Facebook, while others may be overheard in a restaurant or on an airplane. An employee might be shoulder-surfed at a coffee shop or on a train, or lose an unencrypted storage device in a public place, the study observes.

The study also found some methods of leakage that may not be anticipated, such as "print screen" capabilities or photographing of screens on mobile devices. Signals may leak through wireless or electromagnetic (TEMPEST) radiation. Meta data may be hidden within a file, or an attacker might glean classified data by aggregating several pieces of non-classified data, the report notes.

Security awareness remains the best method to prevent these sorts of leaks, Seth says. "I know it's a tired phrase, but we're talking about human behavior here, and the only way to correct the problem is to correct the behavior." Enterprises need to enforce security policies so that there are consequences for leakage, she says.

"People don't pay as much attention unless it affects them directly," Seth says. "Today, people are beginning to understand that their risky behavior or the behavior of those around them can affect their jobs and their companies. If you look at whistle-blower statistics, you'll see it's happening more frequently. But that's not stopping people from holding the door for a stranger, or loaning out their passcards to somebody who says they want to borrow it to go to the bathroom."

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Information Security Forum (ISF)

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
    7 Old IT Things Every New InfoSec Pro Should Know
    Joan Goodchild, Staff Editor,  4/20/2021
    News
    Cloud-Native Businesses Struggle With Security
    Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  5/6/2021
    Commentary
    Defending Against Web Scraping Attacks
    Rob Simon, Principal Security Consultant at TrustedSec,  5/7/2021
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
    We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
    Flash Poll
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
    Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-24119
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    A heap buffer overflow read was discovered in upx 4.0.0, because the check in p_lx_elf.cpp is not perfect.
    CVE-2020-27833
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    A Zip Slip vulnerability was found in the oc binary in openshift-clients where an arbitrary file write is achieved by using a specially crafted raw container image (.tar file) which contains symbolic links. The vulnerability is limited to the command `oc image extract`. If a symbolic link is first c...
    CVE-2021-22866
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    A UI misrepresentation vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed more permissions to be granted during a GitHub App's user-authorization web flow than was displayed to the user during approval. To exploit this vulnerability, an attacker would need to create a GitHub App o...
    CVE-2021-27737
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    Apache Traffic Server 9.0.0 is vulnerable to a remote DOS attack on the experimental Slicer plugin.
    CVE-2021-32054
    PUBLISHED: 2021-05-14
    Firely/Incendi Spark before 1.5.5-r4 lacks Content-Disposition headers in certain situations, which may cause crafted files to be delivered to clients such that they are rendered directly in a victim's web browser.