Attacks/Breaches

1/22/2019
06:15 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Stealthy New DDoS Attacks Target Internet Service Providers

Adversaries took advantage of the large attack surface of large communications networks to spread small volumes of junk traffic across hundreds of IP prefixes in Q3 2018, Nexusguard says.

Distributed denial-of-service attacks targeting large Internet service providers surged in the third quarter of last year as attackers began using a stealthy new tactic to sneak DDoS traffic past detection mechanisms.

An analysis of DDoS data during Q3 2018 by Nexusguard showed attackers trying to overwhelm targeted sites, and even entire ISP -- aka communications provider (CSP) -- networks, by spreading attack traffic across a large number of IP prefixes. Unlike a typical volumetric attack on a single IP address, many of the DDoS campaigns that Nexusguard analyzed involved attackers contaminating legitimate traffic across hundreds of IP addresses with small bits of junk.

The attack traffic within each IP address was small enough to avoid detection by DDoS mitigation tools but big enough to take down a targeted site once converged, Nexusguard said in a report published this week. For example, the average attacks involved just 33.2Mbps of traffic per targeted IP making it hard for service providers to detect and mitigate the traffic.

In total, about 159 autonomous systems - most belonging to service providers - were targeted in "bit-and-piece" attacks in Q3 of 2018. In many of the attacks, hackers appear to have conducted reconnaissance to map out the CSP network and identify critical IP address ranges, Nexusguard said.

The largest attacks involved small bits of DDoS attacks traffic being dispersed to IP addresses across 38 IP prefixes. The maximum number of targeted IP addresses per prefix in these attacks was 252, and the average was 141.  

Attacks sizes per IP address ranged from over 300Mbps at the high-end, to just 2.5Mbps at the low-end, with the average at 33.2Mbps. The average attack size per IP prefix was 2.48Gbps. In a worst-case scenario, an attack of this size spread across 38 IP prefixes is potent enough to overwhelm a 10Gbps ISP line, Nexusguard's report noted.

Mitigation Gap

Donny Chong, product director at Nexusguard, says such attacks highlight the need for enterprises to pay closer attention to the DDoS mitigation abilities of their communications service providers.

DDoS detection and mitigation mechanisms that are based on traffic volume thresholds alone are not sufficient in attacks involving very small volumes of attack traffic, he says. Typical anti-DDoS measures like blackholing traffic is not going to work well either, because of the large number IP addresses that are being used to distribute the attack traffic, Chong notes.

CSPs must step up mitigation measures and go beyond the usual threshold and traffic anomaly detection controls, he says.

Of the thousands of DDoS attacks around the world that Nexusguard measured for its study, nearly 66% or two-thirds, were targeted at CSPs. Simple Service Discovery Protocol (SSDP) amplification attacks—a type of DNS amplification attack—increased more than seven-fold in Q3 compared to Q2 2018 because of the increased focus on CSPs.  

Because so many DDoS attacks in last year's third-quarter involved small traffic volumes, average attack size decreased 82% year-over-year to 0.97Gbps and by more than 96% compared to Q2 2018.

DDoS in Stealth

The new attacks are a continued trend of threat actors evolving DDoS attacks to sneak them past enterprise security controls. Despite the smaller average sizes that Nexusguard reported, DDoS attacks have generally gotten bigger, more sophisticated and multi-faceted in recent years. Many involve multiple attack vectors and, increasingly, services are becoming available that carry out attacks on request or make available tools that allow almost anyone to launch a DDoS attack.

"In 2019, we anticipate more attackers crawling out of the woodwork to offer their services to the highest bidder," NETSCOUT said in a blog earlier this month. Many of these services will provide DIY DDoS tools that lower the bar for attackers, the blog noted.

"While these tools are not necessarily new to the scene, the ease of access, quick iteration at including new attack types, and a broader range of international customers will result in lots of amateur cybercriminals getting hold of destructive malware," the company said.

Related Content:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
High Stress Levels Impacting CISOs Physically, Mentally
Jai Vijayan, Freelance writer,  2/14/2019
Valentine's Emails Laced with Gandcrab Ransomware
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/14/2019
Making the Case for a Cybersecurity Moon Shot
Adam Shostack, Consultant, Entrepreneur, Technologist, Game Designer,  2/19/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
5 Emerging Cyber Threats to Watch for in 2019
Online attackers are constantly developing new, innovative ways to break into the enterprise. This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at five emerging attack trends and exploits your security team should look out for, along with helpful recommendations on how you can prevent your organization from falling victim.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How Enterprises Are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
Data breach fears and the need to comply with regulations such as GDPR are two major drivers increased spending on security products and technologies. But other factors are contributing to the trend as well. Find out more about how enterprises are attacking the cybersecurity problem by reading our report today.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-8980
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
A memory leak in the kernel_read_file function in fs/exec.c in the Linux kernel through 4.20.11 allows attackers to cause a denial of service (memory consumption) by triggering vfs_read failures.
CVE-2019-8979
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
Koseven through 3.3.9, and Kohana through 3.3.6, has SQL Injection when the order_by() parameter can be controlled.
CVE-2013-7469
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
Seafile through 6.2.11 always uses the same Initialization Vector (IV) with Cipher Block Chaining (CBC) Mode to encrypt private data, making it easier to conduct chosen-plaintext attacks or dictionary attacks.
CVE-2018-20146
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
An issue was discovered in Liquidware ProfileUnity before 6.8.0 with Liquidware FlexApp before 6.8.0. A local user could obtain administrator rights, as demonstrated by use of PowerShell.
CVE-2019-5727
PUBLISHED: 2019-02-21
Splunk Web in Splunk Enterprise 6.5.x before 6.5.5, 6.4.x before 6.4.9, 6.3.x before 6.3.12, 6.2.x before 6.2.14, 6.1.x before 6.1.14, and 6.0.x before 6.0.15 and Splunk Light before 6.6.0 has Persistent XSS, aka SPL-138827.