Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

Spam Takes a Vacation

South sea islands account for more spam per capita than anyplace else in the world

If you're thinking of heading to a quiet Pacific island in order to escape spam, forget about it. Some of those islands are worse junk email offenders than the U.S., China, or Russia.

According to a report issued yesterday by security researcher Sophos, some of the Pacific islands relay more spam per capita than any of their larger neighbors across the globe.

Pitcairn Island -- a tiny spot where the mutineers of the HMS Bounty were marooned in 1790 -- relays more spam per person than any other location in the world, according to Sophos. The island's population is about 50 people.

The rest of the top 10 offenders are, in order: Niue, Tokelau, Anguilla, the Faroe Islands, Monaco, Bermuda, Falkland Islands, Andorra, and Aruba.

"Between October-December 2007, the U.S. relayed far more spam than any other country, due to the sheer number of computers in the country that had been taken over by remote hackers," said Carole Theriault, senior security consultant at Sophos. "But when measuring spam emitted per capita, the results are very different.

"Most of the countries [on the list] have very small populations compared to the usual offenders, but their totals are sky-high when it comes to spam emitted on a per-person basis," Theriault said. "Just because your PC is located on a remote island in the South Pacific doesn't mean it's not contributing to the global spam problem."

By contrast, many countries with large populations actually have a fairly low rate of spam per capita. Of the top three spam-producing countries, Russia is No. 45 on the list of the per-capita list, the U.S. is No. 64, and China is No. 132, Sophos reported.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • Sophos plc

    Tim Wilson is Editor in Chief and co-founder of Dark Reading.com, UBM Tech's online community for information security professionals. He is responsible for managing the site, assigning and editing content, and writing breaking news stories. Wilson has been recognized as one ... View Full Bio

     

    Recommended Reading:

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
    Dark Reading Staff 7/13/2020
    Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
    Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
    Mobile App Fraud Jumped in Q1 as Attackers Pivot from Browsers
    Jai Vijayan, Contributing Writer,  7/10/2020
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
    This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
    Flash Poll
    The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
    The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
    This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2020-14174
    PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
    Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to view titles of a private project via an Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) vulnerability in the Administration Permission Helper. The affected versions are before version 7.13.6, from version 8.0.0 before 8.5....
    CVE-2019-20901
    PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
    The login.jsp resource in Jira before version 8.5.2, and from version 8.6.0 before version 8.6.1 allows remote attackers to redirect users to a different website which they may use as part of performing a phishing attack via an open redirect in the os_destination parameter.
    CVE-2019-20898
    PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
    Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to access sensitive information without being authenticated in the Global permissions screen. The affected versions are before version 8.8.0.
    CVE-2019-20899
    PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
    The Gadget API in Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center in affected versions allows remote attackers to make Jira unresponsive via repeated requests to a certain endpoint in the Gadget API. The affected versions are before version 8.5.4, and from version 8.6.0 before 8.6.1.
    CVE-2019-20900
    PUBLISHED: 2020-07-13
    Affected versions of Atlassian Jira Server and Data Center allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or JavaScript via a cross site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Add Field module. The affected versions are before version 8.7.0.