Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/22/2017
07:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

ROPEMAKER Attack Turns Benign Emails Hostile Post-Delivery

The intersection of email and Web technologies has given attackers a way to mess with your email after it has been delivered to your inbox, Mimecast says.

Just because an email is secure when it arrives in your inbox doesn't mean that it cannot be maliciously modified later.

The intersection of email and Web technologies in recent years has given attackers a way to undermine the security and non-repudiation of email, including those that are signed using PGP or SMIME, security vendor Mimecast warned this week.

The email security provider has discovered a new exploit that it has dubbed ROPEMAKER, which gives attackers a way to change the content of an email, at their will, after it has been delivered, and without direct access to the user's email inbox. The exploit enables attackers to do things like swap out a benign URL in a delivered email with a malicious one, to edit text in the body of the email and turn entire chunks of benign text to a malicious URL.

Matthew Gardiner, cybersecurity strategist at Mimecast says the company has deliberately decided not to label the issue as either a product vulnerability or fundamental architectural flaw. "We think this is a topic area that needs to be further debated," he says.

There are certainly measures that email application providers can do to better protect users against the kind of threat posed by ROPEMAKER. "[But] part of the challenge with the ROPEMAKER exploit is it doesn't fall squarely into one particular organization's area of responsibility," he says.

The problem, according to Gardiner, stems from the manner in which PC-based email apps like Outlook and Apple Mail use Web technologies to make emails more visually attractive and dynamic compared to the purely text-based emails of a few years ago. Certain browser-based email clients such as Gmail, Outlook.com and icloud.com that Mimecast looked at were not susceptible to the issue.

"Fundamentally ROPEMAKER exists because Web technologies can and often do interoperate over a network, typically the Internet," Mimecast researchers said in a blog on the topic this week. "To be more precise, two resources that are housed remotely from one another, but are linked via a network can interoperate; one affecting the execution of the other."

For example, on the Web, remotely based and remotely controlled content and resources are routinely fetched or referenced without the local user having to do anything. Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) that organizations use to describe how the layout, fonts, colors, and other features of HTML content should be presented is a good example. CSS enables the separation of content from the components that control how the content should be presented, the company noted.

When used in the context of emails, a remotely hosted CSS file can give an attacker a way to control not just the presentation style of the email but its actual content as well, Mimecast said. Just like Web pages can continuously change text content, audio, and visuals, a remotely hosted CSS can enable changes to the content in email that has already been delivered.

"ROPEMAKER works as long as the email client automatically connects to the remote CSS to retrieve the desired 'style' for the email. This is at the core of the ROPEMAKER exploit," Mimecast said.

In its advisory, the email security vendor described two ways in which an attacker could exploit the issue. One of them showed how an attacker could switch a good URL with a bad one. The other, which Mimecast has dubbed a Matrix Exploit, involved an attacker sending a matrix of ASCII text, character by character, and then using the remote CSS file to control what is displayed to the recipient.

"The Matrix Exploit is the delivery of all possible characters in an email," such as a, A, b, B, c, C, Gardiner says. "And then, post-delivery, making whatever message you want to appear come to life for each individual email user. "This tactic makes it very difficult for an email security product to determine if an inbound mail is good or not because what it says is not determined until after the email has been delivered, Gardiner notes.

Apple Mail has a user setting that would allow email users to block automatic execution of a remote resource—like a remotely hosted CSS file for instance, he says. But few are likely using it.

Most email clients use local CSS for reasons of performance and network connectivity, adds Gardiner. However, remote CSS is supported with HTML and there's no reason to believe attackers wouldn't use it. "From the end users' point of view they don't have any idea where the CSS is hosted, unless they check the HTML source of the email. How many users do that?"

Mimecast has shared its research privately with all of the primary email client vendors, but so far not one of them has acknowledged ROPEMAKER as a vulnerability or exploit. Mimecast says it has not seen any evidence of ROPEMAKER-like attacks in the wild so far.

Learn from the industry’s most knowledgeable CISOs and IT security experts in a setting that is conducive to interaction and conversation. Click for more info and to register.

Related content:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Andrewstrauss
50%
50%
Andrewstrauss,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/25/2017 | 5:44:24 AM
Re: Frightening indeed
wxqx
LisaB845
50%
50%
LisaB845,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/24/2017 | 4:48:49 AM
Re: cah
Didn't even know about the ROPEMAKER Attack, thanks for the heads up.
andreiguru
50%
50%
andreiguru,
User Rank: Apprentice
8/23/2017 | 9:59:32 AM
Re: Frightening indeed
Nothing new here though. This attack vector has been known since email clients introduced the option to block remote content.
REISEN1955
50%
50%
REISEN1955,
User Rank: Ninja
8/23/2017 | 8:28:52 AM
Frightening indeed
As a malware forensics engineer, my department commonly hits on old exploits - couponprinter, ask toolbar, dridex and a host of other pieces of junk.  Then users open email attachments as delivered and get wrecked by this or that.  Now THIS potential infection point is then horror indeed
Overcoming the Challenge of Shorter Certificate Lifespans
Mike Cooper, Founder & CEO of Revocent,  10/15/2020
7 Tips for Choosing Security Metrics That Matter
Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  10/19/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-27605
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton through 2.2.8 uses Ghostscript for processing of uploaded EPS documents, and consequently may be subject to attacks related to a "schwache Sandbox."
CVE-2020-27606
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier) does not set the secure flag for the session cookie in an https session, which makes it easier for remote attackers to capture this cookie by intercepting its transmission within an http session.
CVE-2020-27607
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
In BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier), the client-side Mute button only signifies that the server should stop accepting audio data from the client. It does not directly configure the client to stop sending audio data to the server, and thus a modified server could store the audio data and/or tr...
CVE-2020-27608
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
In BigBlueButton before 2.2.8 (or earlier), uploaded presentations are sent to clients without a Content-Type header, which allows XSS, as demonstrated by a .png file extension for an HTML document.
CVE-2020-27609
PUBLISHED: 2020-10-21
BigBlueButton through 2.2.8 records a video meeting despite the deactivation of video recording in the user interface. This may result in data storage beyond what is authorized for a specific meeting topic or participant.