Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

6/14/2017
10:00 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Relentless Attackers Try Over 100,000 Times Before They Breach a System

New report from startup tCell shows XSS attempts a noisy reminder of the overwhelming scale of automated attack techniques.

One of the big reasons why security teams struggle to keep up with threats is because the bad guys are relentless with their attack attempts. The security community has long warned enterprises of the scope of cybercriminal efforts to seek out vulnerable targets of opportunity through automated attack tools. But sometimes it is hard to take in the scale of it all without a number to back it up. New research out this week from security start-up tCell did just that. 

In a recent study, the firm showed that attackers seeking to breach organizations through cross-site scripting attacks made over 100,000 failed attempts for every successful breach.

The highlight comes from an investigation into attack patterns against 33 actual web applications in production at a dozen firms across a 30-day period. The findings showed that the bad guys rattled the proverbial doorknob with 494,000 XSS attempts at the server, but just four of them actually landed on the browser and needed a full-blown response.

"If you had asked me when we started out on this what was the ratio I might have guessed 1000-1 and thought I might have been exaggerating. But to see that it’s actually half a million attack attempts generating just four actual reaches is really interesting," says Michael Feiertag, CEO of tCell. "These apps are under constant attack and you just can’t wake up in the middle of the night whenever that happens. You have to have tools in place to manage those threats, but also those that know when to hit the panic button."

Alert fatigue is a common problem in the security world today. According to a recent study conducted by Enterprise Management Associates (EMA), 79% of security teams are overwhelmed by security alerts. Meanwhile, 64% of alert tickets are ignored every day by security teams.

"(Security) analysts waste over half of their day looking for problems that are either insignificant or not really problems at all," writes David Monahan, senior analyst for EMA. "They fall behind more each day, which is why dwell time for breaches is over six months."

Meanwhile, attackers are breaking into critical accounts with impunity. According to tCell's analysis, in just a 30-day period, five out of 12 organization suffered an account takeover. Among those five, most suffered more than one takeover and one firm suffered 44 account takeovers in that time. In most cases the attacks resulted in compromised user accounts. Many of them came at the hands of credential-stuffing attacks using user ID and password combinations purloined from major breaches elsewhere.

This kind of attack is the lowest-hanging fruit for cybercriminals today. According to the 10th annual Verizon Data Breach Investigation Report, 81% of successful breaches today can be attributed to stolen or weak passwords. Credential stuffing works because even though the average Internet user has something along the lines of 130 accounts according to one estimate by Dashlane, most of them typically use seven or fewer passwords to protect them, according to a study by the firm Gigya.

 

Related Content:

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Windows 10 Migration: Getting It Right
Kevin Alexandra, Principal Solutions Engineer at BeyondTrust,  5/15/2019
Artist Uses Malware in Installation
Dark Reading Staff 5/17/2019
Baltimore Ransomware Attack Takes Strange Twist
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  5/14/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
Flash Poll
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-12198
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-20
In GoHttp through 2017-07-25, there is a stack-based buffer over-read via a long User-Agent header.
CVE-2019-12185
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-20
eLabFTW 1.8.5 is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads via the /app/controllers/EntityController.php component. This may result in remote command execution. An attacker can use a user account to fully compromise the system using a POST request. This will allow for PHP files to be written to the web r...
CVE-2019-12184
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-19
There is XSS in browser/components/MarkdownPreview.js in BoostIO Boostnote 0.11.15 via a label named flowchart, sequence, gallery, or chart, as demonstrated by a crafted SRC attribute of an IFRAME element, a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-12136.
CVE-2019-12173
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-18
MacDown 0.7.1 (870) allows remote code execution via a file:\\\ URI, with a .app pathname, in the HREF attribute of an A element. This is different from CVE-2019-12138.
CVE-2019-12172
PUBLISHED: 2019-05-17
Typora 0.9.9.21.1 (1913) allows arbitrary code execution via a modified file: URL syntax in the HREF attribute of an AREA element, as demonstrated by file:\\\ on macOS or Linux, or file://C| on Windows. This is different from CVE-2019-12137.