Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

6/24/2019
01:00 PM
50%
50%

Raspberry Pi Used in JPL Breach

NASA report shows exfiltration totaling more than 100 GB of information since 2009.

Auditors' reports tend to make for dry reading. But NASA's Inspector General has delivered a report on "Cybersecurity Management and Oversight at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory" that includes twists and turns — like a hacker using a vulnerable, unapproved Raspberry Pi as a doorway into JPL systems.

That Raspberry Pi was responsible for 500 megabytes of NASA Mars mission data leaving JPL servers. The intrusion resulted in an advanced persistent threat (APT) that was active in JPL's network for more than a year before being discovered.

This was the most recent breach listed in the report. Other breaches noted date back to 2009 and include exfiltration totaling more than 100 gigabytes of information. Several of the intrusions feature command-and-control servers with IP addresses located in China, though the responsibility for the latest attack was not assigned to any country or actor.

The Inspector General's report makes a number of suggestions, including greater network segmentation, more rigorous external device approval, and an improved trouble ticket process, for improving cybersecurity at the lab.

Read more here.

Dark Reading's Quick Hits delivers a brief synopsis and summary of the significance of breaking news events. For more information from the original source of the news item, please follow the link provided in this article. View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Oldest First  |  Newest First  |  Threaded View
tdsan
50%
50%
tdsan,
User Rank: Ninja
6/27/2019 | 9:16:06 PM
Identified and found numerous security vulnerabilities
We also found that security problem log tickets, created in the ITSDB when a potential or actual IT system security vulnerability is identified, were not resolved for extended periods of time—sometimes longer than 180 days.
However, we found the database inventory incomplete and inaccurate, placing at risk JPL's ability to effectively monitor, report, and respond to security incidents.
Further, we found that JPL's network gateway that controls partner access to a shared IT environment for specific missions and data had not been properly segmented to limit users only to those systems and applications for which they had approved access.
PL had not implemented a threat hunting program recommended by IT security experts to aggressively pursue abnormal activity on its systems for signs of compromise, and instead rely on an ad hoc process to search for intruders.
We found that multiple JPL incident management and response practices deviate from NASA and recommended industry practices.For example, unlike NASA's Security Operations Center (SOC), JPL's SOC does not maintain round-the-clock availability of IT security incident responders and JPL's incident response plan does not include all federally-recommended elements.
In addition, team coordination issues delayed completion of incident containment and eradication steps for the April 2018 incident.
No controls were in place to ensure JPL compliance with this requirement nor did NASA officials have access to JPL's incident management system.
As of March 2019, the Agency had not approved JPL's plans to implement new IT security policies and requirements NASA included in its October 2018 contract.

From looking at the report, the JPL Raspberry PI was just one item that was a major issue, I think where I am confused is how did a device from the public get on the network of NASA's Jet Propulsion system's network? There should have been some sort of notification that looked up MAC addresses that were purchased or perform a reg-ex lookup of mac addresses that are not on the production network's device purchase list.
MAC Address/OUIVendor
B8:27:EB Raspberry Pi Foundation
Cisco Network - show mac address-table | in b8:27:eb
show ip arp vlan <vlan no> | include b827.eb

This is from NASA's final security report - https://oig.nasa.gov/docs/IG-19-022.pdf. They stated this occurred over the last 10 years. I am not sure about the rest of the group but the contract, employees and the rest of the security department should all be fired from this point (start from the top, remove everyone and start again).

This is what I mean by incompentence at the highest level.

Todd S
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 9/25/2020
Hacking Yourself: Marie Moe and Pacemaker Security
Gary McGraw Ph.D., Co-founder Berryville Institute of Machine Learning,  9/21/2020
Startup Aims to Map and Track All the IT and Security Things
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  9/22/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
How IT Security Organizations are Attacking the Cybersecurity Problem
The COVID-19 pandemic turned the world -- and enterprise computing -- on end. Here's a look at how cybersecurity teams are retrenching their defense strategies, rebuilding their teams, and selecting new technologies to stop the oncoming rise of online attacks.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-15208
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, when determining the common dimension size of two tensors, TFLite uses a `DCHECK` which is no-op outside of debug compilation modes. Since the function always returns the dimension of the first tensor, malicious attackers can ...
CVE-2020-15209
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, a crafted TFLite model can force a node to have as input a tensor backed by a `nullptr` buffer. This can be achieved by changing a buffer index in the flatbuffer serialization to convert a read-only tensor to a read-write one....
CVE-2020-15210
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In tensorflow-lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, if a TFLite saved model uses the same tensor as both input and output of an operator, then, depending on the operator, we can observe a segmentation fault or just memory corruption. We have patched the issue in d58c96946b and ...
CVE-2020-15211
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 1.15.4, 2.0.3, 2.1.2, 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, saved models in the flatbuffer format use a double indexing scheme: a model has a set of subgraphs, each subgraph has a set of operators and each operator has a set of input/output tensors. The flatbuffer format uses indices f...
CVE-2020-15212
PUBLISHED: 2020-09-25
In TensorFlow Lite before versions 2.2.1 and 2.3.1, models using segment sum can trigger writes outside of bounds of heap allocated buffers by inserting negative elements in the segment ids tensor. Users having access to `segment_ids_data` can alter `output_index` and then write to outside of `outpu...