Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/25/2020
05:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

Phishing Attack Used Box to Land in Victim Inboxes

A phishing attack targeting government and security organizations used a legitimate Box page with Microsoft 365 branding to trick victims.

A newly discovered credential phishing campaign used a legitimate Box webpage and exploited widespread trust in Microsoft 365 to capture victims' credentials in a convoluted attack chain.

The team at Armorblox discovered this threat back in June and say it affected city officials, as well as government and cybersecurity organizations. Attackers chose to host the phishing site on a legitimate Box page, which security experts say helped the emails land in victims' inboxes.

How the attack unfolded: The messages claimed to come from a third-party vendor and asked readers to view a sensitive financial document. The attackers created a sense of urgency by stating "this delivery will only be available for 10 days" and added an air of legitimacy with information about another legitimate third-party website called SecureOnlineDocs[.]com.

Victims who clicked the link were redirected to a page hosted on Box, which contained another document that claimed to be hosted on OneDrive. If a victim clicked the link to access this document, they were sent to a final phishing page built to resemble the Office 365 login portal.

"There, they ask you to log in with your corporate credentials and then they walk away with it," says Arjun Sambamoorthy, co-founder and head of engineering at Armorblox.

Attackers were careful to make the scam seem real. All of the emails had a sender name and domain from a legitimate third-party vendor. The domain, tidewaterhomefunding[.]com, belongs to a Virginia-based home mortgage lending company. It's possible attackers gained a Tidewater Home Funding employee's credentials and used that person's account to launch the attacks.

By hosting the phishing page on Box, the attackers used the reputation of a popular domain to bypass email security filters. Most security tools wouldn't flag a Box page, Sambamoorthy points out.

"The phishers are getting really smart these days, and they're actually leveraging the trust people have established with hosting sites like Box, Dropbox, [Microsoft] 365, Google Drive, and hosting phishing attacks there," he says, noting the team has seen an increase in attacks hosted on Box and Dropbox to fly under security filters' radar.

Despite this, careful users may notice unusual branding. The Box page hosts a document that claims to be shared via OneDrive, with plenty of Microsoft branding to try and lull victims into a sense of security: Phrases like "Secured by OneDrive," "OneDrive for Business," and "Powered by Office 365" were placed throughout the page. However, Sambamoorthy says this is strange.

"It doesn't make sense," he says. "I don't think someone would actually host a link to OneDrive or Google Drive in Box, because they're all competing services themselves. This is very unusual, for something like this to happen."

The team also noticed the link that brought victims to the final Microsoft 365 login page — nantuckettravel[.]icu — was created on June 15, 2020. Because it was so new, the link could bypass security filters configured to block known back domains. These so-called "zero-day" links are becoming less common, Sambamoorthy notes, because they're usually taken down quickly. Today's attackers typically compromise a web server when they want to create a phishing site.

Because they relied on the Box domain, however, the attack already had a higher likelihood of arriving in victims' inboxes. This complicated attack chain improved the phishers' chances of flying under the radar — at least, until the attack was reported to the security industry.

When they detected the campaign, Armorblox reported nantuckettravel[.]icu to the Anti-Phishing Working Group (APWG), which collects and analyzes lists of credential collection sites commonly used in phishing attacks. The site was also added to the safe browser list at Google, so those who access it via established browsers will know it's a malicious page. Armorblox also alerted Tidewater Home Funding to the abuse of an employee's legitimate email account. 

For those who want to keep a closer eye out for attacks like these, Sambamoorthy advises watching for strange website redirection. A link you click in Box, for example, should not ask for Microsoft credentials or send someone to another service's login page. It should go to the Box authentication page and ask for Box credentials or company credentials, he says.

The webpage itself can also raise red flags. If a Box webpage is covered in Microsoft 365 branding, the visitor has reason to be suspicious.  

Kelly Sheridan is the Staff Editor at Dark Reading, where she focuses on cybersecurity news and analysis. She is a business technology journalist who previously reported for InformationWeek, where she covered Microsoft, and Insurance & Technology, where she covered financial ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
matthewkmiller
50%
50%
matthewkmiller,
User Rank: Strategist
8/26/2020 | 1:31:30 PM
Standard Operating Procedure
I see phish similar to the one described here all the time. I've been seeing them for years. Heck maybe I should start up a blog and describe the phishing emails I see. I see phish linking to legitimate OneDrive pages, legitimate Google Docs pages, legitimate Sendgrid URLs, all of which either redirect to phishing pages or just show as an Office 365 logon page, requesting credentials. This article does not describe anything new.
News
Former CISA Director Chris Krebs Discusses Risk Management & Threat Intel
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/23/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
Security + Fraud Protection: Your One-Two Punch Against Cyberattacks
Joshua Goldfarb, Director of Product Management at F5,  2/23/2021
News
Cybercrime Groups More Prolific, Focus on Healthcare in 2020
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  2/22/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: "The truth behind Stonehenge...."
Current Issue
2021 Top Enterprise IT Trends
We've identified the key trends that are poised to impact the IT landscape in 2021. Find out why they're important and how they will affect you today!
Flash Poll
Building the SOC of the Future
Building the SOC of the Future
Digital transformation, cloud-focused attacks, and a worldwide pandemic. The past year has changed the way business works and the way security teams operate. There is no going back.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-27886
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
rakibtg Docker Dashboard before 2021-02-28 allows command injection in backend/utilities/terminal.js via shell metacharacters in the command parameter of an API request. NOTE: this is NOT a Docker, Inc. product.
CVE-2016-8153
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8154
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8155
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.
CVE-2016-8156
PUBLISHED: 2021-03-02
** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. ConsultIDs: none. Reason: The CNA or individual who requested this candidate did not associate it with any vulnerability during 2016. Notes: none.