Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

6/5/2015
05:50 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
100%
0%

OPM Breach Shows Government Cybersecurity Remains Work In Progress

Intrusion continues spate of breaches at federal organizations over past few months.

The massive data breach disclosed by the U.S. Office of Personnel Management (OPM) Thursday shows that federal government efforts at shoring up its cybersecurity remain a work in progress.

In a statement Thursday, the OPM said that in April it discovered an intrusion into IT systems that may have compromised personally identifying information on some 4 million current and former federal employees.

The agency is currently working with the FBI and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security to understand the full scope of the breach. The investigation is still ongoing and it is possible that additional PII compromises will be discovered, the agency cautioned.

“Since the intrusion, OPM has instituted additional network security precautions, including: restricting remote access for network administrators and restricting network administration functions remotely,” the statement said.

OPM has also instituted a review of all connections to ensure that only legitimate business connections have access to the Internet. In addition, the agency will deploy anti-malware tools across its entire environment to prevent the deployment or execution of malicious software that presumably may have been left behind by the intruders.

The agency will begin sending out letters next week informing victims that personally identifying information of theirs may have been potentially compromised in the incident. It will offer free credit monitoring and identity protection services for 18 months to all victims of the breach.

No details are officially available so far on what systems were breached, how they were broken into, or how the intrusion was discovered.  But several media reports quoted unnamed US officials as pinning the blame on China for the attack. The target of the theft appears to have been Social Security Numbers and other personally identifying information, but it is not clear if the attackers were state sponsored or a criminal group, the New York Times said.

The OPM is fundamentally responsible for human resource functions and personnel policy management for the entire federal government. It stores PII on virtually everyone applying for or holding a federal position or wanting to be considered as a federal contractor. So the breach potentially affects individuals from across the entire federal government, making it the biggest of its kind ever.

The breach marks the second time in the past year that hackers have breached OPM’s network. Last July, DHS officials confirmed to the New York Times that intruders had broken some of OPM's databases before they were detected and blocked. In that incident, the attackers appear to have been targeting data on tens of thousands of federal employees who had applied for top-secret security clearances with the OPM, the Times reported. For the moment at least, it's unclear if last year’s incident and the one reported this week are connected.

The OPM breach continues a spate of recent intrusions into federal networks over the past few months. In the space of just one week last fall, both the White House and the U.S. State Department reported that hackers had broken into their networks and accessed what turned out to be unclassified portions of their respective networks.

Just a few weeks prior to that, the U.S. Postal Service announced a breach affecting about 800,000 employees and 2.9 million customers, while the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration announced one just a couple of days later.

The incidents show that change is slow with federal cybersecurity, says Chris Wysopal, chief technology officer at application security vendor Veracode.

The company’s data shows that government agencies lag all other sectors in terms of number of serious defects in their application and the rate at which they fix those vulnerabilities. Based on Veracode’s analysis, the government has the highest prevalence of easily exploitable vulnerabilities like SQL injection and cross-site scripting, Wysopal says.

“You would expect the government to protect its personnel data as well as the finance, healthcare, or manufacturing industries but it just isn’t the case,” he said in an emailed statement.

Grayson Milbourne, security intelligence director at Webroot, says that the latest breach shows why government approaches to cybersecurity are in need of reform. “Clearly, the government’s approach to cybersecurity needs to be reformed, prioritized and accelerated,” he said in an emailed statement.

 “That the breach might have been carried out by the Chinese does not absolve the OPM of blame. The issue here is the government’s technological failings and what it should be doing to prevent future attacks,” Milbourne said.

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Enrico Fontan
50%
50%
Enrico Fontan,
User Rank: Strategist
6/5/2015 | 3:44:39 PM
EINSTEIN System to tune
Government says the breach has been discovered by EINSTEIN system.

If you look at the EINSTEIN system, it possible to see that it has been developed to detect cyber threats.
Looking at the system last evolution we can see that EINSTEIN 3 system adds an IPS to improve it's capabilities:
"The intrusion prevention capability (IPS) builds upon the previous versions by adding the ability to block and disable attempted intrusions before any harm is done."

I think the IPS feature has to be developed again.


EINSTEIN reference "Cross Agency Priority Goal: Cybersecurity FY2013 Q4 Status Update"
kbannan100
50%
50%
kbannan100,
User Rank: Moderator
6/5/2015 | 11:58:29 AM
Being ahead of a breach
This just shows that even the most sophisticated and (you'd hope) solid security measures don't always work. You constantly have to be ahead of a breach and be looking for the unexpected. 

bit.ly/1P0OVdV

--KB 

Karen J. Bannan, commenting on behalf of IDG and FireEye.
Paladium
100%
0%
Paladium,
User Rank: Moderator
6/5/2015 | 10:23:57 AM
Work in progress....?
No, sadly, the excuse that cybersecurity is a work in progress is unacceptable.  

"Here ya go Sir.  Your car is good as new.  Don't worry about the brakes.  They are not hooked up yet.  Just drive slow.  The tires should be fine too.  No worries.  Just don't make any sharpe turns or they might fall off.  We just couldn't get to putting the nuts on them yet.  A stearing wheel you say?  Here, use this long handled screwdriver to turn the stearing collum."

The single, most important fact everyone should take away from these Government breaches is that politics (petty kingdoms, lack of authority, onerous processes to remove a single screw..., etc.) *prevent* cybersecurity from being properly implemented.  Cold, hard, undisputable fact.  

Ask pretty much every single former (who chose to walk away) federal contractor providing cybersecurity services what the number one reason is.
Zero-Factor Authentication: Owning Our Data
Nick Selby, Chief Security Officer at Paxos Trust Company,  2/19/2020
44% of Security Threats Start in the Cloud
Kelly Sheridan, Staff Editor, Dark Reading,  2/19/2020
Ransomware Damage Hit $11.5B in 2019
Dark Reading Staff 2/20/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
6 Emerging Cyber Threats That Enterprises Face in 2020
This Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at six emerging cyber threats that enterprises could face in 2020. Download your copy today!
Flash Poll
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
How Enterprises Are Developing and Maintaining Secure Applications
The concept of application security is well known, but application security testing and remediation processes remain unbalanced. Most organizations are confident in their approach to AppSec, although others seem to have no approach at all. Read this report to find out more.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-5243
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-21
uap-core before 0.7.3 is vulnerable to a denial of service attack when processing crafted User-Agent strings. Some regexes are vulnerable to regular expression denial of service (REDoS) due to overlapping capture groups. This allows remote attackers to overload a server by setting the User-Agent hea...
CVE-2019-14688
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
Trend Micro has repackaged installers for several Trend Micro products that were found to utilize a version of an install package that had a DLL hijack vulnerability that could be exploited during a new product installation. The vulnerability was found to ONLY be exploitable during an initial produc...
CVE-2019-19694
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
The Trend Micro Security 2019 (15.0.0.1163 and below) consumer family of products is vulnerable to a denial of service (DoS) attack in which a malicious actor could manipulate a key file at a certain time during the system startup process to disable the product's malware protection functions or the ...
CVE-2020-5242
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
openHAB before 2.5.2 allow a remote attacker to use REST calls to install the EXEC binding or EXEC transformation service and execute arbitrary commands on the system with the privileges of the user running openHAB. Starting with version 2.5.2 all commands need to be whitelisted in a local file whic...
CVE-2020-8601
PUBLISHED: 2020-02-20
Trend Micro Vulnerability Protection 2.0 is affected by a vulnerability that could allow an attack to use the product installer to load other DLL files located in the same directory.