Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/11/2011
02:42 PM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

'Operation Shady RAT' Attackers Employed Steganography

Digital images hid commands controlling infected machines

The attackers behind the "Operation Shady RAT" targeted cyberespionage hacks hid some of their activities behind digital images.

They used steganography, a relatively rarely deployed technique for hiding malicious code or data behind image files or other innocuous-looking files. In its analysis of Operation Shady RAT, Symantec found rigged images -- everything from images of a pastoral waterside scene to a suggestive photo of a woman in a hat -- that were masking commands ordering the infected machines to phone home to the command-and-control (C&C) server.

The commands are invisible to the human eye because the bits in the image are actually made up of those commands. They're "mathematically built into the data representing the image," according to Symantec researchers in a recent blog post that includes examples of the images its researchers found.

Operation Shady RAT is a massive advanced persistent threat (APT)-type attack campaign that has been ongoing worldwide for five years and has stolen intellectual property from 70 government agencies, international corporations, nonprofits, and others in 14 countries. It was revealed last week by McAfee, which conducted an in-depth study of one of the C&C servers used in the attack.

Remaining under the radar is crucial for APT attackers. The Shady RAT attackers also deployed a tool called HTran that helps disguise their locations. Joe Stewart, director of malware research for Dell SecureWorks' counter threat unit research team, recently discovered a pattern in APT malware in which many of these attackers use HTran -- including the Operation Shady RAT attackers, he says.

Stewart actually was able to glean more information on the attackers' servers after discovering an error they had made in deploying the tool. That led him to the actual C&C servers used by the attackers, and he was able to narrow down the location of the main hubs to Beijing and Shanghai. "They are coming back and conversing with just a few networks in China," he says.

Meanwhile, Ben Greenbaum, senior principle software engineer at Symantec, says the use of steganography is not widespread in most attacks. "We have seen it in some pieces of prominent malware, but it's still in the minority," Greenbaum says.

It's unclear whether ATP attackers, overall, are increasingly employing this masking technology, but it definitely offers them another way to cover their tracks, security experts say.

"I believe use of steg by either an outsider in this case -- or an insider -- is part of the APT," says James Wingate, director of the steganography analysis and research center at Backbone Security. "It is a highly effective technique because the commands are sent covertly, and that would be exceptionally difficult to detect. Our tools would not detect this unless the Trojan was using a known steg app for which we had discovered a signature."

The targeted attacks started with legitimate-looking phishing emails that contained a link to a malicious file or URL. In one case, Defense contractors were targeted with a phishing email that had a link to a rigged spreadsheet, which contained a real list of high-level defense industry executives who attended a recent Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) event; this was also part of Operation Shady RAT.

That particular attack was studied by researchers at Invincea and ThreatGrid, who discovered a legitimate-looking domain that provided a ZIP archive to the attendee roster, complete with names of directors, presidents, and CEOs at major Defense and intelligence companies. But the XLS-looking file was actually an executable that extracted another custom program -- an HTTP client that beacons out to the C&C server, according to Anup Ghosh, founder and CEO of Invincea.

Symantec, meanwhile, says the images and HTML files used by the Shady RAT attackers appear legit, and their commands are actually encrypted. "In the versions of the Trojans that are downloading HTML files, the commands are hidden in HTML comments that look like gibberish, but are actually encrypted commands that are further converted into base-64 encoding," according to Symantec.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
AI Is Everywhere, but Don't Ignore the Basics
Howie Xu, Vice President of AI and Machine Learning at Zscaler,  9/10/2019
Fed Kaspersky Ban Made Permanent by New Rules
Dark Reading Staff 9/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
7 Threats & Disruptive Forces Changing the Face of Cybersecurity
This Dark Reading Tech Digest gives an in-depth look at the biggest emerging threats and disruptive forces that are changing the face of cybersecurity today.
Flash Poll
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-14540
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-15
A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariConfig.
CVE-2019-16332
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-15
In the api-bearer-auth plugin before 20190907 for WordPress, the server parameter is not correctly filtered in the swagger-config.yaml.php file, and it is possible to inject JavaScript code, aka XSS.
CVE-2019-16333
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-15
GetSimple CMS v3.3.15 has Persistent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) in admin/theme-edit.php.
CVE-2019-16334
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-15
In Bludit v3.9.2, there is a persistent XSS vulnerability in the Categories -> Add New Category -> Name field. NOTE: this may overlap CVE-2017-16636.
CVE-2019-16335
PUBLISHED: 2019-09-15
A Polymorphic Typing issue was discovered in FasterXML jackson-databind before 2.9.10. It is related to com.zaxxer.hikari.HikariDataSource. This is a different vulnerability than CVE-2019-14540.