Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

4/17/2012
10:59 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

NYC No. 1 In E-Commerce Fraud

New report says most online fraud in the U.S. comes from the Big Apple, followed by Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, and Omaha, Neb.

If you're conducting online transactions in New York, New York, then you are most at risk of fraud, according to a new study.

ThreatMetrix sampled nearly 1 billion transactions handled by U.S. e-commerce vendors during the first quarter of this year to measure the hot spots for fraud. The security vendor scored each transaction as either low-, medium-, or high-risk; merchants reject what they detect to be high-risk transactions, and perform a manual review of what they detect as medium-risk.

New York City came in first with the most online fraud risk, followed by Atlanta, Chicago, Los Angeles, Omaha, Neb., Dallas, San Francisco, Houston, Washington, D.C., and Lexington, Ken. New York City was one-and-a-half times more likely to be at risk for online e-commerce than Atlanta, and twice as likely compared with Chicago.

"As fraudsters grow more sophisticated and expand globally, it's only natural that large cities with international profiles, easy access to shipping, and high connectivity rates will become breeding grounds for new generations of cyberthreats, including both fraud and malware," said Alisdair Faulkner, chief products officer for ThreatMetrix.

Faulkner said New York City, Chicago, and L.A. are a "gold mine" for cybercriminals looking for identities, passwords, and credit cards to steal. "We would expect to see a highly connected city like San Francisco rank higher, but perhaps the relatively substantial penetration of Apple devices, which are largely seen to be less vulnerable to malware, explains its relatively low ranking," he said.

Miami, Seattle, Austin, Texas, Ft. Lauderdale, Fla., San Diego, Raleigh, N.C., Las Vegas, Minneapolis, Nashville, Tenn., and Philadelphia round out the top 20 most risky cities for online fraud.

Meanwhile, ThreatMetrix plans to also issue a top list of international cities where online fraud originates.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Add Your Comment" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Threaded  |  Newest First  |  Oldest First
DevSecOps: The Answer to the Cloud Security Skills Gap
Lamont Orange, Chief Information Security Officer at Netskope,  11/15/2019
Attackers' Costs Increasing as Businesses Focus on Security
Robert Lemos, Contributing Writer,  11/15/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win a Starbucks Card! Click Here
Latest Comment: This comment is waiting for review by our moderators.
Current Issue
Navigating the Deluge of Security Data
In this Tech Digest, Dark Reading shares the experiences of some top security practitioners as they navigate volumes of security data. We examine some examples of how enterprises can cull this data to find the clues they need.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2011-4968
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
nginx http proxy module does not verify peer identity of https origin server which could facilitate man-in-the-middle attack (MITM)
CVE-2012-0824
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
gnusound 0.7.5 has format string issue
CVE-2012-0843
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
uzbl: Information disclosure via world-readable cookies storage file
CVE-2014-5439
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
sniffit 0.3.7 and prior: A configuration file can be leveraged to execute code as root
CVE-2011-4919
PUBLISHED: 2019-11-19
mpack 1.6 has information disclosure via eavesdropping on mails sent by other users