Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

11/18/2016
02:30 PM
Connect Directly
Twitter
LinkedIn
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

NSA Chief Says DNC Email Leak Was Deliberate Act

Attack was a conscious effort to achieve a specific effect, Director Michael Rogers told the Wall Street Journal this week.

In some of the most unequivocal comments on the issue so far, the director of the National Security Agency (NSA) Michael Rogers this week labeled the leak of emails belonging to the Democratic National Committee in July as a deliberate action by a state actor with specific motives.

Rogers, who also heads the US Cyber Command, was responding to a question on the topic in an interview with the Wall Street Journal that was webcast this week.

“This was not something that was done casually,” Rogers said emphatically referring to the leak and the subsequent decision by whistleblower site WikiLeaks to publish the DNC emails.

“This was not something that was done by chance. This was not a target that was selected purely arbitrarily. This was a conscious effort by a nation state to attempt to achieve a specific effect.”

Rogers however stopped short of attributing the attack on any particular nation state. US officials and law enforcement have suggested evidence points to Russian involvement.  

A lone hacker using the name Guccifer 2.0, has so far been the only one to claim responsibility for the intrusion and theft of over 19,000 emails from the DNC server. Some security vendors have pinned the attack on Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear, two Russian advanced persistent threat groups that are believed to be working for the Russian government.

The leaked emails provided details on major donors of Hillary Clinton’s campaign while many others proved highly embarrassing to the party, prompting the resignation of DNC chair Debbie Schultz and several others.

Many have said the leaks were politically motivated with a view to damaging the Clinton campaign in the crucial last few months leading to the presidential election.

In his interview with the Journal, Rogers described the attack as unacceptable and not something that the US will take lying down. “We are serious, we are prepared to use multiple tools and multiple capabilities that are with our tool kit,” to get nation state actors and other threat groups to change such behavior, he said.

But any response the US takes will be measured and will likely vary depending on threat actor and malicious behavior he said.

Following the massive intrusion at Sony in 2014, for instance, the US came out publicly and formally identified North Korea as the culprit. It imposed economic sanctions against individuals, entities and a portion of the government in that country, Rogers noted. “We highlighted very publicly that this is a first step [and] that we are prepared to take additional action at a time and place of our choosing,” he said.

That response seems to have been effective because there has been no further attacks of the same scale from North Korea.

The U.S. approach with other countries has been different, Rogers said. For instance, in response to concerns about growing Chinese cyber espionage activities, the Obama Administration met with Chinese counterparts in Sept. 2015 and the two sides agreed not to use cyber tools for economic advantage.

“We certainly acknowledge that nation states will use cyber as a tool to generate insight and knowledge about what’s going on in the world around them,” he said. But it is unacceptable, he added, to take knowledge gained from legitimate intelligence-gathering purposes and provide it to the private sector for economic purposes, as some countries do.

Related stories:

 

Jai Vijayan is a seasoned technology reporter with over 20 years of experience in IT trade journalism. He was most recently a Senior Editor at Computerworld, where he covered information security and data privacy issues for the publication. Over the course of his 20-year ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 3:07:15 PM
Re: ewangelia na dziś praca monachium
Which information you are referring to?
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 3:06:04 PM
Re: Politically motivated, likely. But could it be an inside job?
"Was it maliciouls intent by a nefarious party to promote an agenda?"

I think it may be, simply releasing information to mass public is part of the agenda I would say.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:58:07 PM
Re: Industry
"Perhaps it wsa to get someone indebted to Russian banks elected"

I am not sure how much impact of leak had on the election results. There is no concrete evidence of it.

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:54:34 PM
Re: Not a single event
"This was not a one off, it was part of a series of attacks and leaks designed to aid a specific candidate for President of the US."

I would agree. US does the similar information gathering we just do not release it to the media. :--))

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:49:44 PM
Re: scalp psoriasis
Yes, we can actually point our colleagues to this article so there is some traffic in this site.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:47:35 PM
Re: Industry
I agree information provided is good and well written.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:46:25 PM
Re: Politically motivated, likely. But could it be an inside job?
"But the real question should focus on how to secure systems and data not the 'who done it and why?'"

I do not disagree. However, I do think that we need to know who and why to enforce accountability and responsibility.
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:44:04 PM
Re: Politically motivated, likely. But could it be an inside job?
"The computer systems as well may have had a cyber mole who surreptitiously leaked access or took the files"

I agree. I may even be the case that information is shared from inside.

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:43:24 PM
Re: Politically motivated, likely. But could it be an inside job?
"What was the motivation for the DNC leak?"

How about just making the news? Anything unknow disclosed would get attention from the readers.

 
Dr.T
50%
50%
Dr.T,
User Rank: Ninja
11/28/2016 | 2:37:46 PM
Email Leak Was Deliberate Act?
What am I missing here? I do not know how leaked emails could not be deliberate. This I not like an oil pipe leaking. Of course, it is deliberate.

 
Page 1 / 2   >   >>
Data Leak Week: Billions of Sensitive Files Exposed Online
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/10/2019
Intel Issues Fix for 'Plundervolt' SGX Flaw
Kelly Jackson Higgins, Executive Editor at Dark Reading,  12/11/2019
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
The Year in Security: 2019
This Tech Digest provides a wrap up and overview of the year's top cybersecurity news stories. It was a year of new twists on old threats, with fears of another WannaCry-type worm and of a possible botnet army of Wi-Fi routers. But 2019 also underscored the risk of firmware and trusted security tools harboring dangerous holes that cybercriminals and nation-state hackers could readily abuse. Read more.
Flash Poll
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Rethinking Enterprise Data Defense
Frustrated with recurring intrusions and breaches, cybersecurity professionals are questioning some of the industrys conventional wisdom. Heres a look at what theyre thinking about.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2019-5252
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
There is an improper authentication vulnerability in Huawei smartphones (Y9, Honor 8X, Honor 9 Lite, Honor 9i, Y6 Pro). The applock does not perform a sufficient authentication in a rare condition. Successful exploit could allow the attacker to use the application locked by applock in an instant.
CVE-2019-5235
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-14
Some Huawei smart phones have a null pointer dereference vulnerability. An attacker crafts specific packets and sends to the affected product to exploit this vulnerability. Successful exploitation may cause the affected phone to be abnormal.
CVE-2019-5264
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
There is an information disclosure vulnerability in certain Huawei smartphones (Mate 10;Mate 10 Pro;Honor V10;Changxiang 7S;P-smart;Changxiang 8 Plus;Y9 2018;Honor 9 Lite;Honor 9i;Mate 9). The software does not properly handle certain information of applications locked by applock in a rare condition...
CVE-2019-5277
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Huawei CloudUSM-EUA V600R006C10;V600R019C00 have an information leak vulnerability. Due to improper configuration, the attacker may cause information leak by successful exploitation.
CVE-2019-5254
PUBLISHED: 2019-12-13
Certain Huawei products (AP2000;IPS Module;NGFW Module;NIP6300;NIP6600;NIP6800;S5700;SVN5600;SVN5800;SVN5800-C;SeMG9811;Secospace AntiDDoS8000;Secospace USG6300;Secospace USG6500;Secospace USG6600;USG6000V;eSpace U1981) have an out-of-bounds read vulnerability. An attacker who logs in to the board m...