Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

11/1/2007
09:38 AM
Connect Directly
Google+
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Key Management Technology Could Improve RFID Security

Tutarus, SecureRF encrypt RFID data on the chip

A lightweight encryption technology that uses a one-time, self-destructing encryption key will land on RFID chips sometime next year, according to the firm that developed it.

Tutarus already sells the technology for the Defense Department and other government agencies for encryption projects outside of RFID, and its technology is found in email encryption programs for Outlook, as well as file security applications.

"We are a key management system, not a new form of encryption," says Ray Clayton, CTO for Tutarus. Tutarus's so-called Secure Random Key (SRK) technology uses the AES encryption algorithm, with 256-bit keys. The goal is to provide a simple encryption solution that doesn't require extra processing or store the keys where they can be cracked or stolen, according to Tutarus.

"We randomly create a key, encrypt the data and then destroy the key," Tutarus' Clayton says. "The encryption and decryption process is not taking place on the RFID chip... We are thinking about putting our [decryption] process on the 'gun' that needs to read that RFID chip. The gun would then decrypt it and present it to the user."

RFID security has been under the microscope for the past year or so as hackers have had a virtual field day, easily cracking and cloning RFID cards, and using SQL injection to dupe a card reader into opening the building to a stranger. Even the newer VeriChip locater technology can be cloned, and many RFID-based passports come with weak encryption. Part of the problem is that many RFID systems are deployed without security or authentication on the part of the cardholder. (See RFID Under Attack Again.)

Encryption is considered the missing link for securing data stored on RFID tags and cards. But the processing requirements of encrypting and decrypting public/private keys has been a major factor impeding the adoption of encryption for RFID.

"I've done a couple of pretty big RFID audits [lately] and issues with encryption keep coming up," says Joshua Perrymon, hacking director for PacketFocus Security Solutions, who says Tutarus's technology sounds promising for efficiently encrypting RFID.

RFID vendor SecureRF will begin general shipping its LIME Tag RFID tags that use public key encryption. Louis Parks, CEO of SecureRF, says his firm's technology takes up a smaller mathematical footprint than most encryption methods, handling the processing on the chip.

"Each tag has a unique private/public key pairing," Parks says. "Most people today are encrypting the data on a PC and putting the encrypted data on the RFID card, then decrypting it by taking it off and decrypting it on a PC. But the danger of that is copying the encrypted data and putting it on a rogue tag... You don't know if it's real or fake." (See SecureRF Intros Secure RFID Tag.)

Meanwhile, Tutarus' Clayton says the advantage of his firm's symmetric key approach is that every chip has its own key, and you don't need any separate machines to do the key processing.

Tutarus plans to begin testing its technology for RFID in the next two months, and will build a prototype. Clayton says he's not sure yet just how it will be packaged or its pricing, but the idea would be to place it in a generic chip.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

  • PacketFocus Security Solutions
  • SecureRF Corp.
  • Tutarus Corp.

    Kelly Jackson Higgins is Executive Editor at DarkReading.com. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

    Comment  | 
    Print  | 
    More Insights
  • Comments
    Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
    7 Truths About BEC Scams
    Ericka Chickowski, Contributing Writer,  6/13/2019
    DNS Firewalls Could Prevent Billions in Losses to Cybercrime
    Curtis Franklin Jr., Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/13/2019
    Can Your Patching Strategy Keep Up with the Demands of Open Source?
    Tim Mackey, Principal Security Strategist, CyRC, at Synopsys,  6/18/2019
    Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
    White Papers
    Video
    Cartoon
    Current Issue
    Building and Managing an IT Security Operations Program
    As cyber threats grow, many organizations are building security operations centers (SOCs) to improve their defenses. In this Tech Digest you will learn tips on how to get the most out of a SOC in your organization - and what to do if you can't afford to build one.
    Flash Poll
    The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
    The State of IT Operations and Cybersecurity Operations
    Your enterprise's cyber risk may depend upon the relationship between the IT team and the security team. Heres some insight on what's working and what isn't in the data center.
    Twitter Feed
    Dark Reading - Bug Report
    Bug Report
    Enterprise Vulnerabilities
    From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
    CVE-2019-12881
    PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
    i915_gem_userptr_get_pages in drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem_userptr.c in the Linux kernel 4.15.0 on Ubuntu 18.04.2 allows local users to cause a denial of service (NULL pointer dereference and BUG) or possibly have unspecified other impact via crafted ioctl calls to /dev/dri/card0.
    CVE-2019-3953
    PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
    Stack-based buffer overflow in Advantech WebAccess/SCADA 8.4.0 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code by sending a crafted IOCTL 10012 RPC call.
    CVE-2019-12133
    PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
    Multiple Zoho ManageEngine products suffer from local privilege escalation due to improper permissions for the %SYSTEMDRIVE%\ManageEngine directory and its sub-folders. Moreover, the services associated with said products try to execute binaries such as sc.exe from the current directory upon system ...
    CVE-2019-12592
    PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
    A universal Cross-site scripting (UXSS) vulnerability in the Evernote Web Clipper extension before 7.11.1 for Chrome allows remote attackers to run arbitrary web script or HTML in the context of any loaded 3rd-party IFrame.
    CVE-2017-8328
    PUBLISHED: 2019-06-18
    An issue was discovered on Securifi Almond, Almond+, and Almond 2015 devices with firmware AL-R096. The device provides a user with the capability of changing the administrative password for the web management interface. It seems that the device does not implement any cross site request forgery prot...