Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/26/2010
11:49 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New DDoS Botnet Hits Nearly 200 Websites

'YoyoDdos' botnet is waging distributed denial-of-service attacks on Chinese, U.S., other sites

A new botnet built for knocking websites offline has attacked mostly Chinese and some U.S. sites, according to researchers.

About 90 percent of the command and control servers running YoyoDdos, the nickname given the botnet by researchers at Arbor Networks who have been studying and tracking it, have IP addresses in China, and two-thirds of its victim websites are out of China. The botnet has attacked around 180 websites so far, including 32 in the U.S.

"It is a pretty active botnet," says Jeff Edwards, a research analyst with Arbor who has been analyzing the botnet, which first appeared in Arbor's honeypot servers back in March. "We've detected a lot of attacks coming out of it ... [around] ten unique victims a day."

The malware itself isn't particularly sophisticated, however. "It's pretty typical of a lot of malware we see," he says. "It's a fairly non-sophisticated piece of malware, but effective."

YoyoDdos has taken down online merchants, blogs, forums, poker sites, and some hosting providers, Edwards says. "We've seen attacks going on for one or two days. If you're an online merchant and your site is taken down for one or two days, that's pretty serious."

Edwards says the bot malware may be spread via spam messages -- it appears to infect victims via malicious links that download the executable. Arbor isn't sure just how many bots it contains at this time.

Communications-wise, YoyoDdos uses some basic obfuscation in the protocol that the bot uses to communicate with the control server. "It was easy to reverse-engineer," he says.

Meanwhile, Arbor has written an algorithm to detect the bot. "It's also able to identify characteristics of the DDoS flooding against the victim, so we can positively identify that with high precision," he says. Edwards posted a blog earlier this week with technical details on YoyoDddos.

Have a comment on this story? Please click "Discuss" below. If you'd like to contact Dark Reading's editors directly, send us a message.

Kelly Jackson Higgins is the Executive Editor of Dark Reading. She is an award-winning veteran technology and business journalist with more than two decades of experience in reporting and editing for various publications, including Network Computing, Secure Enterprise ... View Full Bio

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Commentary
What the FedEx Logo Taught Me About Cybersecurity
Matt Shea, Head of Federal @ MixMode,  6/4/2021
Edge-DRsplash-10-edge-articles
A View From Inside a Deception
Sara Peters, Senior Editor at Dark Reading,  6/2/2021
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Write a Caption, Win an Amazon Gift Card! Click Here
Post a Comment
Current Issue
The State of Cybersecurity Incident Response
In this report learn how enterprises are building their incident response teams and processes, how they research potential compromises, how they respond to new breaches, and what tools and processes they use to remediate problems and improve their cyber defenses for the future.
Flash Poll
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
How Enterprises are Developing Secure Applications
Recent breaches of third-party apps are driving many organizations to think harder about the security of their off-the-shelf software as they continue to move left in secure software development practices.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2021-24360
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
The Yes/No Chart WordPress plugin before 1.0.12 did not sanitise its sid shortcode parameter before using it in a SQL statement, allowing medium privilege users (contributor+) to perform Blind SQL Injection attacks
CVE-2021-24382
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
The Smart Slider 3 Free and pro WordPress plugins before 3.5.0.9 did not sanitise the Project Name before outputting it back in the page, leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting issue. By default, only administrator users could access the affected functionality, limiting the exploitability of the v...
CVE-2021-24341
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
When deleting a date in the Xllentech English Islamic Calendar WordPress plugin before 2.6.8, the year_number and month_number POST parameters are not sanitised, escaped or validated before being used in a SQL statement, leading to SQL injection.
CVE-2021-24345
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
The page lists-management feature of the Sendit WP Newsletter WordPress plugin through 2.5.1, available to Administrator users does not sanitise, validate or escape the id_lista POST parameter before using it in SQL statement, therefore leading to Blind SQL Injection.
CVE-2021-24346
PUBLISHED: 2021-06-14
The Stock in & out WordPress plugin through 1.0.4 has a search functionality, the lowest accessible level to it being contributor. The srch POST parameter is not validated, sanitised or escaped before using it in the echo statement, leading to a reflected XSS issue