Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

8/18/2020
04:10 PM
50%
50%

New Campaign Combines Extortion, DDoS

Latest attacks bank on the reputation of two prominent APT groups to increase the threat credibility.

In the continuing evolution of cyberthreats, a new wave of attacks on businesses is combining distributed denial-of-service (DDoS) attacks and extortion. According to researchers at Akamai, the latest attacks attempt to leverage the reputations of two famous advanced persistent threat (APT) groups -- Fancy Bear and Armada Collective -- to encourage victims to pay rather than risk real DDoS attacks.

In a post about the new campaign, Akamai researchers Steve Ragan and Larry Cashdollar describe email messages sent to victims, some of which said that any attempt to publicize the threat or contact authorities will be met with "permanent" DDoS attacks.

The attack claiming to be from Armada Collective begins with a demand for five Bitcoins ($60,600), with an increase to 10 Bitcoins ($120,120) if the deadline is missed and then five Bitcoins added each day until the extortion is paid. The group using Fancy Bear demands 20 Bitcoins ($240,240) to begin, increasing to 30 Bitcoins for a missed deadline and 10 Bitcoins each day that follows.

In an interview with Dark Reading, Ragan says attackers threaten an attack of up to 2 Tbps against the victim; in at least one case they have launched a 50 Gbps attack to demonstrate their capability. According to the researchers, the demonstration attack was a UDP-based, ARMS protocol reflection attack using an unknown number of reflectors.

The researchers advise organizations receiving a threatening message not to pay and instead immediately talk to their upstream ISP and DDoS mitigation provider. "These are defendable attacks," says Ragan, especially if providers know to look for the initial flood of UDP packets.

Read more here.

 

Curtis Franklin Jr. is Senior Editor at Dark Reading. In this role he focuses on product and technology coverage for the publication. In addition he works on audio and video programming for Dark Reading and contributes to activities at Interop ITX, Black Hat, INsecurity, and ... View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon Contest
Current Issue
2020: The Year in Security
Download this Tech Digest for a look at the biggest security stories that - so far - have shaped a very strange and stressful year.
Flash Poll
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
Assessing Cybersecurity Risk in Today's Enterprises
COVID-19 has created a new IT paradigm in the enterprise -- and a new level of cybersecurity risk. This report offers a look at how enterprises are assessing and managing cyber-risk under the new normal.
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-12512
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to an authenticated reflected POST Cross-Site Scripting
CVE-2020-12513
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to an authenticated blind OS Command Injection.
CVE-2020-12514
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to a NULL Pointer Dereference that leads to a DoS in discoveryd
CVE-2020-12525
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
M&M Software fdtCONTAINER Component in versions below 3.5.20304.x and between 3.6 and 3.6.20304.x is vulnerable to deserialization of untrusted data in its project storage.
CVE-2020-12511
PUBLISHED: 2021-01-22
Pepperl+Fuchs Comtrol IO-Link Master in Version 1.5.48 and below is prone to a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in the web interface.