Dark Reading is part of the Informa Tech Division of Informa PLC

This site is operated by a business or businesses owned by Informa PLC and all copyright resides with them.Informa PLC's registered office is 5 Howick Place, London SW1P 1WG. Registered in England and Wales. Number 8860726.

Attacks/Breaches

4/26/2017
09:40 AM
Connect Directly
Twitter
RSS
E-Mail
50%
50%

New Ad Fraud Campaign Uses Millions of Domain Names to Bilk Advertising Networks

NoTrove has established a huge infrastructure to make money through click redirection and scam traffic-brokering.

The digital advertising industry is getting socked with a new ad fraud campaign that's operating millions of fully qualified domain names (FQDN) and thousands of IPs to steal online ad revenue with shady ads and sham traffic-brokering.

In a report released today by digital threat management firm RiskIQ, researchers dug into the campaign run by a threat actor it calls NoTrove that demonstrates the lengths to which cybercriminals will go to steal from digital advertising networks - and the inherent weaknesses of the online ad ecosystem.

Unlike traditional malicious advertising, NoTrove isn't dropping malicious files on users' systems. Instead, it's making money by fraudulently redirecting clicks and in some cases downloading potentially unwanted programs (PUPs) that perpetuate more scam traffic so that NoTrove perpetrators can broker in sham advertising traffic.

"Traffic is critical to the giant exchanges in the online advertising space and to the very many niche affiliate network programs that exist, with organizations of all kinds tasked with monetizing and, ultimately, squeezing every last fraction of a penny of indirect marginal pro t of each URL visited," the report explains. "To monetize their traffic collecting, scammers like the one outlined in this report may participate in shady traffic affiliate programs or sell traffic to traffic brokers."

The researcher behind the report says the ubiquity of NoTrove is what sets the threat apart from other scammers and malware distributors taking advantage of vulnerable ad networks.

"NoTrove is literally everywhere," says William MacArthur, threat researcher for RiskIQ. "We’ve seen NoTrove burn through just under 2,000 domains and over 3,000 IPs. Combined with the 78 variations of campaign-specific middle word variants and randomized hostnames, we’ve seen NoTrove operate across millions of FQDNs."

Attackers go to extreme lengths like these because of the sheer amount of money at stake in online advertising fraud. According to eMarkter, digital ad spending is expected to hit $83 billion by the end of the year and $129 billion by 2021. It's a huge target of opportunity for fraudsters and has spawned a dizzying array of fraud campaigns like this one.

For example, last year researchers with ad fraud detection firm WhiteOps reported finding one of the largest ad fraud botnets ever, called MethBot, which it estimated was able to steal $3 million a day from programmatic video ad networks.

"Instead of the more traditional malware botnet structures, which involve attacks on existing IP addresses and piggybacking on residential computers, Methbot operators farm out their operations across a distributed network based on a custom browser engine running out of data centers on IP addresses acquired with forged registration data," WhiteOps explained in the report.

RiskIQ's MacArthur explains that NoTrove has been able to grow so large because it operates in a grey area of maliciousness that makes it possible for it to fly under the radar of many technologies that look for malicious advertising. With malvertising scams, the goal is to infect users with some sort of malware that can be used as a beach head for further attacks against each individual victims. Malwarebytes Labs researchers last week reported a new malvertising campaign called Binary Options that was delivering a Gozi banking Trojan payload through the RIG exploit kit in order to carry out a traditional malware assault against online users.

But with scams like NoTrove, the fraudsters are just trying to manipulate users' traffic in order to steal from digital advertising networks and publishers.

"This makes it different from normal malvertising as the content actually being delivered is not an injection leading to an exploit kit or a particular binary that people often track, so it’s a lot easier to operate compared to the more common Exploit Kit Threat operation," MacArthur says. "As a result, scammers are left unchecked and can balloon to outrageous sizes. Unfortunately for ad networks and publishers, the effect of scams and exploit kits can be the same: ad blocking by end users."

This is a big risk for the advertising industry--according to Jupiter Research, ad blocking will cost it $27 billion by the end of the decade. But MacArthurs says that security professionals from any industry can stand to observe NoTrove's tactics to keep apprised of evolving attack techniques.

"NoTrove is spread so far and wide that blocking one piece of its infrastructure is akin to playing whack-a-mole—no matter how many you hit, another will pop up. If left unchecked, NoTrove and threat actors like it will continue to balloon to even greater size, encompassing more domains, IPs, and other infrastructure," he says. "Threat actors of all kinds are taking a page from this playbook, accumulating massive swaths of infrastructure to carry out their campaigns and essentially overwhelm traditional security controls."

He recommends using machine learning and automation to identify subtle variances in payloads, and automatically blocking such nefarious infrastructure.

Related Content:

 

Ericka Chickowski specializes in coverage of information technology and business innovation. She has focused on information security for the better part of a decade and regularly writes about the security industry as a contributor to Dark Reading.  View Full Bio
 

Recommended Reading:

Comment  | 
Print  | 
More Insights
Comments
Newest First  |  Oldest First  |  Threaded View
COVID-19: Latest Security News & Commentary
Dark Reading Staff 7/14/2020
Omdia Research Launches Page on Dark Reading
Tim Wilson, Editor in Chief, Dark Reading 7/9/2020
Register for Dark Reading Newsletters
White Papers
Video
Cartoon
Current Issue
Special Report: Computing's New Normal, a Dark Reading Perspective
This special report examines how IT security organizations have adapted to the "new normal" of computing and what the long-term effects will be. Read it and get a unique set of perspectives on issues ranging from new threats & vulnerabilities as a result of remote working to how enterprise security strategy will be affected long term.
Flash Poll
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
The Threat from the Internetand What Your Organization Can Do About It
This report describes some of the latest attacks and threats emanating from the Internet, as well as advice and tips on how your organization can mitigate those threats before they affect your business. Download it today!
Twitter Feed
Dark Reading - Bug Report
Bug Report
Enterprise Vulnerabilities
From DHS/US-CERT's National Vulnerability Database
CVE-2020-10287
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-15
The IRC5 family with UAS service enabled comes by default with credentials that can be found on publicly available manuals. ABB considers this a well documented functionality that helps customer set up however, out of our research, we found multiple production systems running these exact default cre...
CVE-2020-10288
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-15
IRC5 exposes an ftp server (port 21). Upon attempting to gain access you are challenged with a request of username and password, however you can input whatever you like. As long as the field isn't empty it will be accepted.
CVE-2020-15780
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-15
An issue was discovered in drivers/acpi/acpi_configfs.c in the Linux kernel before 5.7.7. Injection of malicious ACPI tables via configfs could be used by attackers to bypass lockdown and secure boot restrictions, aka CID-75b0cea7bf30.
CVE-2019-17639
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-15
In Eclipse OpenJ9 prior to version 0.21 on Power platforms, calling the System.arraycopy method with a length longer than the length of the source or destination array can, in certain specially crafted code patterns, cause the current method to return prematurely with an undefined return value. This...
CVE-2019-20908
PUBLISHED: 2020-07-15
An issue was discovered in drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c in the Linux kernel before 5.4. Incorrect access permissions for the efivar_ssdt ACPI variable could be used by attackers to bypass lockdown or secure boot restrictions, aka CID-1957a85b0032.